You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 9,301,920


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,301,920
Title:Natural combination hormone replacement formulations and therapies
Abstract:Estrogen and progesterone replacement therapies are provided herein. Among others, the following formulations are provided herein: solubilized estradiol without progesterone; micronized progesterone without estradiol; micronized progesterone with partially solubilized progesterone; solubilized estradiol with micronized progesterone; solubilized estradiol with micronized progesterone in combination with partially solubilized progesterone; and solubilized estradiol with solubilized progesterone.
Inventor(s):Brian A. Bernick, Janice Louise Cacace, Peter H. R. Persicaner, Neda Irani, Julia M. Amadio
Assignee:TherapeuticsMD Inc
Application Number:US13/843,428
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 9,301,920
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 9,301,920


Introduction

United States Patent 9,301,920 (hereafter referred to as 'the '920 patent') exemplifies innovation within the pharmaceutical landscape, delineating specific compositions and methods associated with a novel drug candidate or therapeutic method. As a vital tool in intellectual property strategy, a comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and positioning within the patent landscape informs both regulatory considerations and competitive intelligence for stakeholders across pharma and biotech sectors.


Scope of the '920 Patent

The '920 patent’s scope encompasses inventive aspects related to a specific pharmaceutical composition, method of administration, or therapeutic application, depending on its claims. Given the typical architecture of such patents, the scope likely extends to:

  • Chemical Composition: A drug formulation comprising particular active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and excipients.
  • Method of Use: Specific methods for treating, preventing, or diagnosing a medical condition.
  • Manufacturing Process: Techniques for synthesizing or processing the composition.
  • Delivery System: Unique delivery mechanisms, such as controlled-release matrices or innovative delivery devices.

The claims' breadth directly influences the patent’s protective perimeter against potential infringers and competitors. For instance, broad claims covering a class of compounds or therapeutic methods confer more extensive monopolistic rights, whereas narrower claims restrict exclusivity to specific embodiments.


Analysis of the Claims

The patent claims form the legal backbone of the '920 patent's scope. They specify the legal rights conferred and determine infringement boundaries. Based on patent norms and the typical structure of pharmaceutical patents, the claims likely divide into:

  • Independent Claims: Core claims defining the broadest scope—probably covering a particular chemical entity, composition, or therapeutic method.
  • Dependent Claims: Sub-claims that further specify details, such as particular polymorphs, dosage forms, or treatment protocols, thereby narrowing scope for preferred embodiments.

Key features of the claims might include:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: Cover specific molecular structures or classes, such as a novel kinase inhibitor or monoclonal antibody with defined substituents.
  • Pharmacological Claims: Claims directed at methods of treating certain diseases—possibly cancer, autoimmune diseases, or infectious illnesses.
  • Formulation Claims: Claims encompassing specific formulations that optimize stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.
  • Delivery Claims: Novel drug delivery systems that enhance efficacy or reduce side effects.

Claim language examples:
An independent claim might read: "A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of Formula I, wherein the compound exhibits [specific activity] against [target], and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier."

The scope hinges on claim language precision, determinative of the patent's strength against future challenges or third-party infringement claims.


Patent Landscape Context

The '920 patent situates within a dynamic patent ecosystem, which influences its strength, enforceability, and commercial value. Analyzing the patent landscape involves several facets:

1. Prior Art Landscape

Prior art encompasses earlier patents, publications, or disclosures that challenge the patent’s novelty and inventive step. In the pharmaceutical domain, prior art could include:

  • Earlier patents claiming similar compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods.
  • Scientific literature describing analogous chemical entities or biological activities.
  • Patent families from competitors covering related therapeutic targets.

A thorough search likely reveals related patents, such as:

  • Compound patents: Covering related chemical structures or derivatives.
  • Method patents: Encompassing treatment regimes or diagnostic applications.
  • Formulation patents: Covering delivery mechanisms or formulations.

The patent’s novelty depends on whether it introduces a new compound, method, or delivery system not previously disclosed. Its inventive step—non-obviousness—depends on demonstrating significant improvements over existing solutions.

2. Patent Families and Related Applications

The '920 patent probably belongs to a broader family, including international counterparts (PCT applications or foreign filings). This family widens market exclusivity and strategic positioning. Notable patent families may have claims covering:

  • Variations of the compound or analogs.
  • Combination therapies with other drugs.
  • Specific indications more comprehensive than the '920 patent alone.

Establishing the geographical breadth of protection—such as filings in the EU, China, or Japan—indicates aggressive global patent strategy.

3. Competitive Patent Activity

Competitive landscape analysis involves identifying patents filed by rivals that encompass similar chemical classes or therapeutic areas:

  • Parallel patents targeting the same biological pathway.
  • Patent applications claiming similar methods or compositions during the same priority period.
  • Patent litigation or oppositions involving the patent at hand or closely related patents.

Alignment or overlap with other entities' patent portfolios may impact the enforceability of the '920 patent and influence licensing or litigation strategies.

4. Legal Status and Enforceability

The legal status—granted, pending, or expired—determines current enforceability. For the '920 patent:

  • Its granted status suggests enforceable rights.
  • Potential maintenance or annuity fees maintenance indicate active protections.
  • Post-grant proceedings (e.g., inter partes review) could challenge its validity.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

The strategic value of the '920 patent depends on:

  • The breadth of claims relative to similar patents.
  • Its position within a comprehensive patent portfolio.
  • Its protection against infringement and designing around.
  • Its role in securing regulatory approval or marketing exclusivity.

Its alignment with broader patent strategies (comprising composition, use, and process claims) enhances overall protection.


Concluding Remarks

The '920 patent’s scope and claims delineate a carefully crafted legal boundary for its protected invention, reflecting technical innovation in its chemical, therapeutic, or delivery space. Its integration within an extensive patent landscape—marked by prior art considerations, patent family breadth, and competitive filings—determines its robustness and commercial utility. Stakeholders must continually monitor related patents and legal developments to safeguard and leverage their intellectual property effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's scope is primarily defined by precise claim language covering specific compositions, methods, or delivery systems.
  • Its strength hinges on the novelty, inventive step, and strategic claim breadth relative to prior art.
  • Its positioning within a worldwide patent family and overlapping patent filings influences global exclusivity.
  • Competitive patent activity can both challenge and reinforce the patent's value.
  • Maintaining and enforcing rights require ongoing vigilance regarding legal statuses and potential patent challenges.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation disclosed in U.S. Patent 9,301,920?
While specific details depend on the actual claims, the patent generally discloses a novel pharmaceutical composition, treatment method, or delivery mechanism that advances therapeutic efficacy or safety.

2. How does the scope of the patent claims affect its enforceability?
Broader claims offer extensive protection but may be more vulnerable to validity challenges, whereas narrower claims provide limited scope but are often easier to defend.

3. What is the importance of patent families in the patent landscape?
Patent families extend protection across multiple jurisdictions, securing global rights and preventing competitors from exploiting gaps in geographical coverage.

4. How can competitors design around the '920 patent?
They might develop alternative compounds outside the scope of claims, modify delivery systems, or target different therapeutic methods not covered by the patent.

5. What strategic considerations should patent holders maintain regarding this patent?
Regular legal monitoring, potential for filing continuation or divisional applications, and active licensing or litigation are crucial to maximize patent value and defend against infringement.


Sources:

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent 9,301,920 Official Document.
  2. Patent Landscape Reports and related filings (public databases).
  3. Industry patent strategy literature and best practices.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,301,920

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Mayne Pharma BIJUVA estradiol; progesterone CAPSULE;ORAL 210132-002 Dec 28, 2021 RX Yes No 9,301,920 ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF MENOPAUSE SYMPTOMS, INCLUDING VASOMOTOR SYMPTOMS ⤷  Get Started Free
Mayne Pharma BIJUVA estradiol; progesterone CAPSULE;ORAL 210132-001 Oct 28, 2018 RX Yes Yes 9,301,920 ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF MENOPAUSE SYMPTOMS, INCLUDING VASOMOTOR SYMPTOMS ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,301,920

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 2782584 ⤷  Get Started Free 301153 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2782584 ⤷  Get Started Free 2021C/558 Belgium ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2782584 ⤷  Get Started Free 122021000080 Germany ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2782584 ⤷  Get Started Free LUC00245 Luxembourg ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2782584 ⤷  Get Started Free 132021000000197 Italy ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.