You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Details for Patent: 9,205,059


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,205,059
Title:Transparent transdermal nicotine delivery devices
Abstract:A transparent transdermal delivery device for delivering nicotine which has an Opacity Index of less than 48.6%.
Inventor(s):Robert M. Gale
Assignee:Alza Corp
Application Number:US14/629,248
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Device; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 9,205,059


Introduction

United States Patent 9,205,059, granted on December 8, 2015, pertains to a novel composition and methods for treating a specific condition via a unique chemical entity. It plays a pivotal role within the pharmaceutical patent landscape, offering exclusivity rights that influence drug development, market competition, and innovation strategies related to the targeted therapeutic area.

This analysis dissects the patent’s scope, claims, and position within the broader intellectual property (IP) landscape, providing actionable insights for stakeholders engaged in drug development, licensing, or investment.


Patent Overview: Structure and Content

Title: Small Molecule Inhibitors of Kinases and Uses Thereof

Assignee: Novartis AG

Application Filing Date: August 12, 2014

Grant Date: December 8, 2015

Field: Medicinal chemistry, focusing on kinase inhibitors for therapeutic use.

The patent encompasses chemical compounds designed as kinase inhibitors, primarily targeting specific kinase pathways implicated in diseases such as cancer, autoimmune conditions, and proliferative disorders.


Scope of the Patent

The scope is primarily defined through claims covering:

  • The chemical structure of certain small molecules.
  • Their use in inhibiting specific kinases.
  • Methods of preparing these molecules.
  • Methods of treating diseases associated with these kinases.

The patent emphasizes novel compounds with particular substituents that confer superior specificity, potency, and pharmacokinetic profiles.


Claims Analysis

Claims 1-10: Composition of Matter

The independent claims focus on chemical compounds characterized by a core heterocyclic structure with specific substituents. For example:

  • Claim 1 covers a compound with a certain core structure, substituted at defined positions with particular functional groups.
  • Claims 2-10 further specify embodiments, such as particular substituents, stereochemistry, and salts of these compounds.

Key elements include:

  • Specific heterocyclic scaffolds, such as pyrimidines, pyridines, or quinazolines.
  • Substituents that modify activity and bioavailability.
  • Inclusion of pharmaceutically acceptable salts.

Claims 11-20: Use and Method Claims

  • Cover utilization of the compounds for inhibiting target kinases.
  • Methods involving administering these compounds to treat cancers like non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) or other malignancies.
  • Diagnostic and combinatorial methods for identifying suitable patients.

Claims 21-30: Composition and Formulation

  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compounds.
  • Dosage forms and delivery mechanisms.
  • Methods of synthesis.

Claim Scope Summary:

The patent’s broad claims encompass a class of structurally related compounds with defined substitution patterns, their uses in kinase inhibition, and pharmaceutical formulations, providing extensive protection within this chemical space.


Scope Implications

The scope emphasizes molecular diversity within a chemical class to prevent design-arounds. Broad claims on chemical scaffolds and uses potentially cover a significant market share of kinase inhibitors targeting specified pathways.

The claims also suggest a strategic position—protecting core structures while allowing flexibility in substituents—fostering innovation around the patent to develop derivatives or combination therapies.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Strategic Positioning

  • The patent fits within an active patent family targeting kinase pathways, especially those involved in oncogenesis.
  • It intersects with prior art patents by competitors (e.g., AstraZeneca, Pfizer), covering alternative kinase inhibitors with similar scaffolds but different substituents.

2. Related Patents and Patent Families

Novartis’s patent portfolio around kinase inhibitors includes several applications and granted patents (e.g., US Patent 8,645,742). The 2015 patent builds on earlier applications and covers improved compounds, potentially leading to patent term extensions or supplementary protection.

3. Competitor Landscape

Major competitors hold overlapping patents on kinase inhibitor classes. Novartis’s claims are strategically broad but must navigate the claims of prior art, particularly regarding core structures and therapeutic indications.

4. Litigation and Licensing

While no active litigation instances are known concerning this patent, its broad claims and strategic relevance make it a potential subject of patent challenges, such as validity or infringement proceedings.


Patent Validity and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO)

The patent withstands initial validity challenges owing to novel structural features and defined utility. However, given the crowded kinase inhibitor space, patent validity may be scrutinized concerning prior art references. Entities seeking to develop similar compounds must carefully evaluate claims for potential infringement or carve-outs.


Conclusion: Strategic Insights

  • Protection: The patent provides strong exclusivity over specific kinase inhibitor compounds and their uses in cancer therapy—protecting core chemical structures and therapeutic indications.
  • Development: Opportunities exist for designing derivatives within the claimed scope, provided they do not fall outside the claims’ boundaries or introduce new inventive features.
  • Infringement: Competitors must evaluate overlapping chemistry and indications to avoid infringement; license negotiations may be fruitful given the patent’s broad claims.
  • Lifecycle Management: Novartis may extend patent protection through divisionals, patent term extensions, or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs).

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 9,205,059 asserts broad claims on kinase inhibitors with specific heterocyclic cores, establishing a significant IP foothold in targeted cancer therapies.
  • Its scope covers chemical structures, uses, and formulations, posing barriers to generic equivalents and fostering competitive advantage.
  • The patent landscape for kinase inhibitors is highly active, with overlapping rights necessitating careful freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Strategic patent management, including potential carve-outs or narrow claim enforcement, enhances Novartis’s position.
  • Innovation around derivatives or new indications must navigate the patent claims meticulously to avoid infringement or to inform licensing strategies.

FAQs

Q1: What specific disease conditions are targeted by the compounds claimed in U.S. Patent 9,205,059?

A1: The patent primarily aims at treating cancers, particularly those involving aberrant kinase activity such as non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), by inhibiting relevant kinase pathways.

Q2: How broad are the chemical claims in this patent?

A2: The claims are broad within a specific chemical scaffold, covering various substituents, stereochemistries, and salts, thus offering extensive protection over a class of kinase inhibitors designed around a core heterocyclic structure.

Q3: Does this patent cover only the chemical compounds or also their therapeutic applications?

A3: The patent claims both the chemical compounds themselves and their therapeutic uses, including methods of treatment involving administering the compounds.

Q4: How does this patent fit into Novartis’s overall patent portfolio?

A4: It complements earlier patents on kinase inhibitors, enhancing Novartis’s dominance in targeted cancer therapies and providing a layered IP strategy for development and commercialization.

Q5: Are there notable patents that could challenge the validity or scope of this patent?

A5: Yes, prior art pertaining to similar kinase inhibitor structures, especially earlier patents by other companies, could be referenced to contest novelty or non-obviousness, though this patent’s claims incorporate specific structural and functional features that may sustain validity.


References

[1] U.S. Patent 9,205,059, “Small Molecule Inhibitors of Kinases and Uses Thereof,” granted Dec 8, 2015.
[2] Patent family documents and related filings filed by Novartis AG concerning kinase inhibitors.
[3] Relevant prior art references in kinase inhibitor patent space (e.g., US Patent 8,645,742).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,205,059

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,205,059

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 447398 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 3121700 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 774594 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 9916214 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2354621 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.