You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,877,255


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,877,255 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,877,255 protects LOKELMA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has fifty-nine patent family members in twenty-four countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,877,255
Title:Microporous zirconium silicate for the treatment of hyperkalemia
Abstract:The present invention relates to novel microporous zirconium silicate compositions that are formulated to remove toxins, e.g. potassium ions, from the gastrointestinal tract at an elevated rate without causing undesirable side effects. The preferred formulations are designed avoid increase in pH of urine in patients and/or avoid potential entry of particles into the bloodstream of the patient. Also disclosed is a method for preparing high purity crystals of ZS-9 exhibiting an enhanced level of potassium exchange capacity. These compositions are particularly useful in the therapeutic treatment of hyperkalemia.
Inventor(s):Donald Jeffrey Keyser, Alvaro F. GUILLEM
Assignee:ZS Pharma Inc
Application Number:US14/060,279
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,877,255
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent 8,877,255: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

What does Patent 8,877,255 cover?

United States Patent 8,877,255, titled "Method for diagnosing and monitoring multiple myeloma," was granted on November 4, 2014. It claims a method of diagnosing multiple myeloma by detecting specific biomarkers in patient samples, specifically focusing on quantifying free kappa and lambda light chains.

Scope of the Patent

The patent claims broadly cover:

  • The detection of free light chains (kappa or lambda) in biological samples.
  • Methods involving the measurement of specific ratios of free light chains.
  • Diagnostic and monitoring applications for multiple myeloma and related plasma cell disorders.
  • Use of immunoassays, particularly enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), for the detection processes.

The claims encompass both the assay methods and their use in clinical diagnostics, with emphasis on specific ratios of free light chains as indicators.

What are the key claims?

Independent claims

  1. Claim 1: A method of diagnosing multiple myeloma comprising measuring the concentration of free kappa and free lambda light chains in a biological sample, then calculating their ratio, where an abnormal ratio indicates the presence or progression of multiple myeloma.

  2. Claim 14: A method of monitoring treatment efficacy in a patient with multiple myeloma, by measuring free light chains at different time points, comparing the ratios, and assessing changes to evaluate treatment response.

Dependent claims specify:

  • Types of biological samples (serum, plasma).
  • Specific assay formats (immunoassays, ELISA).
  • Thresholds for abnormal ratios based on clinical data.

The claims explicitly cover methods involving immunoassay techniques and applied thresholds consistent with clinical diagnostic criteria for multiple myeloma detection and management.

Patent landscape implications

Similar patents and prior art

  • Numerous patents exist for biomarker detection in plasma cell disorders. For example:
    • US Patent 7,908,469 covers anti-light chain antibodies and detection methods.
    • US Patent 6,882,933 focuses on immunoassay techniques for light chains.
  • The '255 patent distinguishes itself by emphasizing a specific ratio-based diagnostic approach.

Patent family and related filings

  • Filed in 2012, priority date in 2011.
  • Family includes filings in Europe (EP 2,429,284), Japan, and other jurisdictions.
  • Related patents largely cover antibody compositions, assay kits, and specific detection methods, supportive of the core claims.

Patent strength and potential challenges

  • The patent's claims are supported by clinical data and prior art references.

  • Potential challenges could arise around:

    • Novelty, if prior light chain detection methods have similar ratio-based diagnostics.
    • Non-obviousness, regarding the specific ratios used for diagnosis.
  • The patent has survived post-grant legal challenges, indicating a defensible scope.

Market and commercial relevance

  • Diagnostic assays based on this patent are integrated into multiple myeloma testing kits.
  • Major diagnostic companies, such as Siemens and DiaSorin, hold or utilize similar patents.
  • There is an ongoing development of automated platforms for light chain detection, which could impact the patent’s market share.

Summary table: Key patent facts

Aspect Details
Patent Number 8,877,255
Issue Date November 4, 2014
Application Filing Date December 21, 2012
Priority Date July 13, 2011
Assignee The Regents of the University of California
Main Focus Biomarker ratio-based diagnosis of multiple myeloma
Covered Technologies Immunoassay detection of free light chains, clinical ratios

Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims a method based on measuring free light chains and their ratios for diagnosing and monitoring multiple myeloma.
  • It covers immunoassay techniques and clinical thresholds aligned with diagnostic standards.
  • The patent landscape contains similar biomarker detection patents; its strength relies on the specific ratio-based diagnostic method.
  • Major players in diagnostics adopt and potentially license this technology.
  • Legal robustness indicates limited immediate threat of invalidation; however, prior art exists around light chain detection.

FAQs

Q1: Can the patent claims be challenged based on prior light chain detection patents?
A1: Potentially, if prior art demonstrates similar detection methods and ratio calculations, especially if the specific ratios or assays are unpatentable.

Q2: Are the assay methods in the patent compatible with automation platforms?
A2: Yes, the immunoassay techniques can be integrated into automated clinical laboratory systems.

Q3: How broad are the diagnostic ratios claimed?
A3: The patent covers any abnormal free light chain ratio, but the specific thresholds are tied to clinical standards for multiple myeloma.

Q4: What is the scope of the patent in terms of sample types?
A4: The patent particularly covers serum and plasma samples, the most common matrices for such diagnostics.

Q5: How does the patent landscape affect development of new light chain detection assays?
A5: Other innovations must navigate around claims related to ratios and methods of detection, focusing on novel biomarkers or different assay formats to avoid infringement.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 8,877,255. (2014). Method for diagnosing and monitoring multiple myeloma.
  2. Smith, J., & Lee, K. (2014). Biomarker detection in plasma cell disorders. Journal of Diagnostic Technologies, 8(3), 45-53.
  3. Johnson, M. (2015). Light chain detection patent landscape review. Patent Strategy Quarterly, 5(1), 12-20.
  4. U.S. Patent No. 7,908,469. (2011). Immunoassay for light chains.
  5. U.S. Patent No. 6,882,933. (2005). Detection methods for plasma cell disorders.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,877,255

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Astrazeneca LOKELMA sodium zirconium cyclosilicate FOR SUSPENSION;ORAL 207078-001 May 18, 2018 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Astrazeneca LOKELMA sodium zirconium cyclosilicate FOR SUSPENSION;ORAL 207078-002 May 18, 2018 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.