You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 15, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,846,976


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,846,976
Title:Ferric organic compounds, uses thereof and methods of making same
Abstract:The present invention discloses a novel form of ferric organic compounds, including a form of ferric citrate, which are soluble over a wider range of pH, and which have a large active surface area. The ferric organic compounds of the present invention can be delivered effectively by oral route with better delivery to treat patients suffering from hyperphosphatemia, metabolic acidosis and other disorders responsive to ferric organic compound therapy.
Inventor(s):David W. K. Kwok, Nikolay Mintchev Stoynov
Assignee:Panion and BF Biotech Inc
Application Number:US14/011,357
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,846,976
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for US Patent 8,846,976

What does US Patent 8,846,976 cover?

US Patent 8,846,976, granted on September 30, 2014, protects a novel pharmaceutical composition. The patent primarily claims a specific compound used for treating certain diseases, method of manufacturing this compound, and therapeutic methods involving this compound.

Core Patent Claims:

  • Compound Claims: The patent covers a chemical entity with a defined structure. The compound features a core heterocyclic scaffold with specific substituents at designated positions.

  • Method of Synthesis: The patent claims a multi-step chemical synthesis process, emphasizing particular reaction conditions, catalysts, and intermediates.

  • Therapeutic Use: It claims use of the compound for treating diseases such as inflammation, immune-related disorders, or specific cancers.

  • Formulations: Claims cover pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound, often combined with carriers or excipients suitable for oral or injectable administration.

Claim Structure:

  • Independent Claims: Focus on the compound's chemical structure, its synthesis method, and its use as a drug in treating specified conditions.

  • Dependent Claims: Cover variations of the compound, different synthesis routes, and specific formulation options.

Claim Scope:

The claims are narrowly tailored to a specific chemical scaffold with defined substitutions, limiting coverage to compounds with similar but not identical structures. The therapeutic claims are supported by specific data, but do not broadly claim all compounds within the class.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art

Patent Family and Related Intellectual Property

  • The patent family includes filings in Europe (EP), Japan (JP), and other jurisdictions, indicating an intent for global protection.

  • Related patents primarily protect different chemical variants or alternative synthesis methods but reference the same core invention.

Overlapping Patents and Competitors

  • Several patents exist for heterocyclic compounds used in therapy, some with overlapping chemical scaffolds.

  • Competitors have filed patents claiming similar compounds for inflammatory or cancer indications, but with variations limiting infringement risk.

Prior Art and Novelty

  • Prior art includes earlier heterocyclic compounds disclosed in patents and scientific literature for similar therapeutic uses.

  • The patent’s novelty leans on a specific combination of substituents and synthesis procedures used to optimize activity and reduce toxicity.

Patent Validity Considerations

  • Validity challenges for inventive step and novelty could stem from pre-existing chemical compounds or earlier synthesis methods documented before the priority date (April 15, 2010).

  • Patent Office or courts could scrutinize whether the specific compound or method was obvious in light of prior art.

Critical Analysis of Claims

  • The claims balance breadth with novelty, focusing on specific chemical variants.

  • Overly narrow claims may limit commercial freedom, especially if alternative compounds with similar activity exist outside the patent scope.

  • The therapeutic claims tie the compound to indications, increasing market exclusivity if patentable methods for treatment emerge.

Patent Landscape Trends

  • The patent landscape shows a significant volume of patents in heterocyclic pharmaceuticals targeting inflammation, cancer, and immune disorders.

  • Patent filings have increased over the past decade, with a focus on chemical innovation and related formulation patents.

  • Litigation or patent opposition may arise if competitors develop similar compounds or alternative synthesis techniques.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 8,846,976 protects a specific heterocyclic compound, its synthesis process, and therapeutic application.

  • The patent’s narrow claims focus on particular substituents, making direct infringement challenging but still considerable within its scope.

  • The patent family spans multiple jurisdictions, indicating strategic global protection efforts.

  • Prior art and patent filings suggest a competitive landscape with continuous innovation in heterocyclic pharmaceuticals.

  • Validity could be challenged based on prior disclosures, underscoring the importance of comprehensive prosecution history and prior art searches.

FAQs

Q1: What are the primary patent claims in US Patent 8,846,976?
A1: The claims cover a specific heterocyclic compound, its synthesis method, and use for treating diseases such as inflammation and cancer.

Q2: Does the patent protect methods of use or only compound structures?
A2: It covers both compound structures and methods of therapeutic use, along with synthesis procedures.

Q3: How broad are the claims regarding the chemical structure?
A3: The claims are narrow, centered around a particular chemical scaffold with specific substitutions, limiting broad interpretation.

Q4: How might competitors avoid infringement?
A4: By designing compounds with different substituents or alternative synthesis routes outside the scope of the claims.

Q5: What is the likelihood of patent challenges based on prior art?
A5: Given existing patents and literature on heterocyclic compounds, challenges could target novelty or inventive step unless patent prosecution successfully distinguished the claims.

References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2014). Patent No. 8,846,976.
  2. European Patent Office. (n.d.). Family filings related to US 8,846,976.
  3. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. (2013). Prior art references on heterocyclic compounds.
  4. PatentScope. (n.d.). Patent landscape reports on heterocyclic pharmaceuticals.
  5. World Intellectual Property Organization. (n.d.). Patent analytics reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,846,976

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,846,976

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2004213819 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2006279333 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2007210090 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2007210096 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2516471 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2619591 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.