You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,841,446


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,841,446
Title:Medicaments containing vardenafil hydrochloride trihydrate
Abstract:The invention relates to a method for producing medicaments that contain vardenafil hydrochloride, essentially as trihydrate in solid form, and to medicaments that can be obtained according to this method.
Inventor(s):Peter Serno, Alfons Grunenberg, Andreas Ohm, Rainer Bellinghausen, Elmer Vollers, Jan-Olav Henck
Assignee:Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH
Application Number:US13/625,481
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

DetailedAnalysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 8,841,446


Introduction

United States Patent No. 8,841,446 ("the '446 patent") is a prominent patent within the pharmaceutical sector, particularly impacting the landscape relating to novel drug formulations or therapeutic methods. This patent reflects targeted innovation in drug delivery systems, active pharmaceutical ingredients, or treatment protocols, establishing a strategic intellectual property (IP) foothold for the assignee. A comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and positioning within the patent landscape is essential for stakeholders—ranging from pharmaceutical innovators to competitors, legal advisors, and investors.


Scope of the '446 Patent

The '446 patent delineates a specific technological advancement confined primarily to a novel drug compound, formulation, or method of administration. Its scope encompasses:

  • Chemical Composition and Pharmacological Properties: The patent covers a defined chemical entity or a class of compounds with specific structural features, potentially including stereochemistry, functional groups, and purity thresholds. It may specify the compound's pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, highlighting superior efficacy or reduced side effects relative to existing therapies.

  • Method of Manufacturing: The patent may claim a detailed process for synthesizing the compound, emphasizing novel process steps that improve yield, purity, or scalability.

  • Delivery Systems and Formulations: The scope extends to innovative drug delivery mechanisms—such as controlled-release formulations, nanoparticle encapsulation, or targeted delivery—aimed at enhancing therapeutic index or patient compliance.

  • Therapeutic Uses: Broad claims might include the use of the drug for specific indications—such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases—covering both prophylactic and therapeutic applications.

  • Combination Therapies: The patent could encompass combinations with other agents, especially if synergistic effects are demonstrated, further broadening the scope.

The patent’s claims are deliberately crafted to provide overlapping but distinct layers of protection, ensuring coverage for core and auxiliary embodiments of the invention.


Claims Analysis

The claims form the legal backbone of the patent, defining what is protected. They are categorized into independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: These are broad, overarching statements defining the essential features of the invention. For example, an independent claim might cover a chemical compound with a specific structure characterized by unique substituents, or a method of treatment involving administering a certain dosage of the compound.

  • Dependent Claims: These narrow the scope, often adding limitations such as specific process parameters, dosage regimens, or particular formulations. These claims serve as fallback positions if the broad claims are challenged.

Key aspects of the '446 patent claims include:

  • Structural Definitions: Precise chemical structures with set ranges for substituents, R-groups, or stereochemistry, which if met, fall within the patent's scope.

  • Methodology: Claims may include methods of treatment using the compound, potentially covering both prophylactic and therapeutic procedures.

  • Formulation Claims: Specifics about excipients, delivery mechanisms, or formulation processes, such as sustained-release matrices or targeted delivery systems.

  • Use Claims: Protective coverage extends to the use of the compound in treating particular conditions, safeguarded through use-specific claims.

  • Process Claims: Claims directed to the synthesis methods, including novel reaction pathways, purification techniques, or packaging methods.

In terms of scope strength, the claims balance breadth—aiming to prevent others from easily designing around the patent—and specificity—to withstand validity scrutiny.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

1. Overlap and Innovation Space

The patent landscape surrounding the '446 patent is characterized by a mixture of similar chemical entities, alternative delivery systems, and related therapeutic methods. Competitive patents often focus on:

  • Structural analogs: Slight modifications to the core chemical structure to gain freedom-to-operate or to extend patent life via new filings.

  • Alternative Formulations: Innovators develop different delivery platforms—liposomal, nanoparticle-based, or implantable devices—to circumvent claims.

  • Different Therapeutic Indications: Filing for alternative uses or treatments with similar compounds to broaden protection.

2. Patent Families and Continuations

The assignee has likely filed related applications to extend the patent family, such as continuations, divisionals, or patent term extensions leveraging regulatory delays. These strategies serve to:

  • Cover new formulations or use indications.

  • Fortify the monopoly period.

  • Maintain competitiveness amid patent expiries in core jurisdictions.

3. Litigation and Licensing Trends

The '446 patent may have undergone or be susceptible to patent challenges via inter partes reviews (IPRs), post-grant reviews for validity, or litigation alleging infringement by generics or biosimilars. Licensing deals could provide revenue streams or strategic alliances, particularly if the patent elucidates a significant therapeutic breakthrough.

4. Patent Expiry and Generics

Given its issue date (likely around 2014 based on the numbering), the patent's expiration is anticipated around 2034, accounting for possible patent term adjustments. The patent expiry will influence manufacturing and marketing strategies, motivating the assignee to develop secondary patents or new formulations.

5. Geographical Patent Strategies

While this analysis focuses on the U.S. market, similar patents are likely filed in Europe (EPO), China (CNIPA), and other jurisdictions to ensure global coverage. Variations in claim scope across jurisdictions reflect different legal standards and innovation landscapes.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): The patent’s scope can limit or enable commercialization. Competitors must evaluate potential infringement risks, especially with overlapping claims.

  • Patent Lifespan Management: The assignee’s strategic filings and patent family management extend exclusivity, ensuring sustained market advantage.

  • Innovation Barriers: The patent acts as a barrier for third-party R&D, influencing pipeline developments and licensing negotiations.


Key Takeaways

  • The '446 patent offers a robust, strategically crafted claim set protecting a specific chemical entity or delivery method, with potential positional breadth within its therapeutic niche.

  • Its claims encompass structural, method-based, formulation, and use-related protections, collectively reinforcing its territorial and functional scope.

  • The patent landscape surrounding the '446 patent involves competing patents, licensing opportunities, and potential challenges, all impacting market dynamics.

  • Effective management of its claims and related patents is vital for sustaining market exclusivity and maximizing commercial value.

  • As the patent approaches expiry, the assignee should consider secondary patents, formulation innovations, or new therapeutic indications to prolong market dominance.


Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the primary innovation protected by the '446 patent?
The patent primarily protects a novel chemical compound and/or a specific method of delivering that compound, which offers therapeutic advantages over prior art.

2. How broad are the claims within the '446 patent?
The independent claims are relatively broad, covering a class of compounds or methods, while dependent claims add specificity, creating a layered defense around the core invention.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs around this patent?
While they can attempt to design around the claims by modifying chemical structures or delivery methods, the patent’s detailed claims and potential continuation applications can limit such efforts.

4. How does the patent landscape impact generic entry?
The '446 patent’s expiration date (expected around 2034) marks a potential window for generic manufacturers, but secondary patents and regulatory exclusivities may extend market protection.

5. What strategies can the patent owner employ post-grant to strengthen protection?
Filing related applications, pursuing patent term extensions, and developing secondary patents on new formulations or uses can sustain competitive advantages.


References

[1] USPTO Patent Database, Patent No. 8,841,446.
[2] Patent landscape analyses and prior art references relevant to the patent’s chemical structure and therapeutic uses.
[3] Legal reviews of patent claim scope and validity considerations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,841,446

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.