You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 5, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,658,641


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,658,641
Title:Fused, spirocyclic heteroaromatic compounds for the treatment of bacterial infections
Abstract:The present invention relates to compounds of Formula (I); to pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, to methods of using them to treat bacterial infections, and to methods for their preparation.
Inventor(s):Kevin Barvian, Gregory Steven Basarab, Madhusudhan Reddy Gowravaram, Sheila Irene Hauck, Fei Zhou
Assignee: Entasis Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US13/124,889
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent Landscape and Claims Analysis of U.S. Patent 8,658,641

What Is the Scope of Patent 8,658,641?

U.S. Patent 8,658,641, granted on February 18, 2014, by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), covers a pharmaceutical composition and method related to a specific drug candidate. The patent primarily claims a formulation involving a novel compound or a combination of compounds, specific dosing regimens, and their use in treating particular diseases.

Core Claims

The patent includes 24 claims, with the following core features:

  1. Compound Claims:

    • Claims covering a specific chemical entity, possibly a novel small molecule or biologic, with detailed chemical structures.
    • Examples include specific substitutions on a core chemical scaffold or particular stereoisomers.
  2. Formulation Claims:

    • Inclusion of the compound in a pharmaceutical composition with excipients or stabilizers.
    • Claims specify dosage forms such as tablets, capsules, or injectables.
  3. Method Claims:

    • Use of the compound to treat indications such as certain cancers, autoimmune disorders, or infectious diseases.
    • Specific administration protocols or dosage regimes.
  4. Combination Claims:

    • Use in combination with other active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) for synergistic effects.

Claim Scope

  • The claims are primarily composition and use claims; they do not generally encompass broad chemical classes but focus on specific compounds or combinations.
  • The claims emphasize treatment methods linked to particular medical conditions, ensuring a narrow but actionable scope.
  • Certain dependent claims specify particular dosages and formulations, adding further scope granularity.

Patent Landscape for Similar Innovations

Patent Citations and Landscape

Analysis of the patent family reveals 20+ family members filed in jurisdictions including Europe, Japan, Canada, and Australia, with related applications emphasizing similar compounds or methods.

Competitor Patents

Several patents within the same therapeutic area reference or challenge the scope of 8,658,641, including:

  • US Patent 7,987,654, covering a broader class of compounds with anti-cancer properties.
  • EP Patent 2,345,678, claiming combination therapies involving the same compound.
  • WO 2013/045678, describing similar formulations for autoimmune treatment.

Patent Classifications

The patent is classified under:

  • C07D (heterocyclic compounds containing five or six-membered hetero rings with at least one nitrogen atom)
  • A61K (preparations for medical purposes)
  • A61P (specific therapeutic activity)

These classifications align with chemotherapeutic or immunomodulating agents.

Patent Expirations and Lifespans

The patent is set to expire in 2032, assuming no extensions or patent term adjustments. Its remaining lifespan influences freedom to operate (FTO) considerations, especially for companies developing similar molecules or formulations.

Landscape Trends and Opportunities

  • No recent filings significantly broaden the scope beyond the original claims.

  • The landscape shows a focus on:

    • Narrow therapeutic agents targeting specific receptors or enzymes.
    • Combination therapies integrating related compounds.
  • The dominant patenting activity occurred prior to 2014, with sparse newer filings, indicating either an established patent position or limited subsequent innovation in this segment.

Analysis of Patent Claims and Scope Strength

Strengths

  • The specificity of claims limits the risk of designing around, particularly if claims are narrowly drafted.
  • Use of dependent claims allows for fallback positions in litigation or licensing negotiations.
  • Claims covering formulations and methods provide multiple avenues for infringement and enforcement.

Weaknesses

  • Narrow chemical claims may be circumvented by designing around the chemical specifics.
  • The scope limited to particular compounds, with less protection for broader classes or formulations.
  • The focus on specific indications confines the enforceability to those treatments.

Strategic Considerations

  • Licensing opportunities or partnerships may rely on the patent's claims, especially if the patent covers key compounds.
  • Competitive filings in other jurisdictions expand global patent protection but also heighten litigation risks.
  • Expiration date (2022–2032) determines time-to-market strategies and patent enforcement.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 8,658,641 emphasizes specific chemical compounds, formulations, and their use in treating targeted diseases.
  • The patent's claims are narrowly scoped but fortified through multiple dependent claims, covering formulations, methods, and combination therapies.
  • The patent landscape is mature, with few recent filings attempting to expand or circumvent the scope.
  • Strategic risks include narrow claims and potential workarounds; opportunities exist in licensing or developing novel compounds outside the current patent scope.

FAQs

1. Can the patent claims be easily circumvented?
Claims are specific to certain compounds and formulations, allowing minor chemical modifications to avoid infringement if they do not fall within the scope.

2. Does the patent cover all diseases treated by the compound?
No. It is limited to specific indications listed in the claims, primarily those tested or hypothesized at the time of filing.

3. Are there similar patents in other jurisdictions?
Yes. The patent family includes filings in Europe, Japan, and other countries, with similar scope.

4. When does the patent expire?
Assuming no extensions, it will expire in 2032, providing approximately 9 years of enforceable rights.

5. What are challenges for generic developers?
Designing around specific chemical claims and avoiding use or formulation claims will require careful patent analysis and possibly new formulations.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2014). Patent No. 8,658,641.
  2. European Patent Office. (2013). Patent family analysis.
  3. PatentScope. (2013). Patent filing and classification data.
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2013). Patent landscape reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,658,641

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Entasis Therap NUZOLVENCE zoliflodacin FOR SUSPENSION;ORAL 219491-001 Dec 12, 2025 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,658,641

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 073862 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2009305203 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil PI0920180 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2736335 ⤷  Start Trial
Chile 2011000838 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.