You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 25, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,658,198


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,658,198 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,658,198 protects ZUBSOLV and is included in one NDA.

This patent has eleven patent family members in nine countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,658,198
Title:Non-abusable pharmaceutical composition comprising opioids
Abstract:There is provided pharmaceutical compositions for the treatment of pain comprising a pharmacologically-effective amount of an opioid analgesic, or a pharmaceutically-acceptable salt thereof, presented in particulate form upon the surfaces of carrier particles comprising a pharmacologically-effective amount of an opioid antagonist, or a pharmaceutically-acceptable salt thereof, which carrier particles are larger in size than the particles of the opioid analgesic. The compositions are also useful in prevention of opioid abuse by addicts.
Inventor(s):Anders Pettersson
Assignee:Biolipox AB
Application Number:US13/799,117
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,658,198
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Dosage form; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Drug Patent 8,658,198: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

U.S. Patent 8,658,198, granted to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company on February 18, 2014, covers methods of treating lupus erythematosus. The patent claims a specific dosage regimen for a pharmaceutical composition comprising pegylated interferon alfa-2b. This analysis examines the patent's scope, key claims, and its position within the broader lupus treatment patent landscape.

What is the Core Invention Protected by U.S. Patent 8,658,198?

The patent protects a method of treating lupus erythematosus using a specific dosing schedule of pegylated interferon alfa-2b. The claimed method involves administering the drug at a dose of 50 micrograms per week for a duration of at least 24 weeks, followed by a subsequent administration period of at least 24 weeks at a dose of 25 micrograms per week. This structured dosing approach is central to the patent's claims.

What are the Key Claims of U.S. Patent 8,658,198?

The patent comprises multiple claims, with Claim 1 defining the primary invention.

  • Claim 1: This independent claim details the method of treating lupus erythematosus. It specifies administering a pharmaceutical composition containing pegylated interferon alfa-2b. The regimen requires an initial administration of 50 micrograms of pegylated interferon alfa-2b per week for a period of at least 24 weeks. Following this initial period, the treatment continues with an administration of 25 micrograms of pegylated interferon alfa-2b per week for an additional period of at least 24 weeks.

  • Dependent Claims: Several dependent claims further refine the scope of Claim 1 by adding specific parameters or preferred embodiments. These may include details regarding:

    • The specific form of lupus erythematosus (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus).
    • The route of administration (e.g., subcutaneous injection).
    • The patient population.
    • The formulation of the pharmaceutical composition.

A comprehensive review of the full patent document is necessary to ascertain all dependent claims and their specific limitations.

What is the Stated Purpose and Efficacy of the Patented Treatment?

The stated purpose of the treatment protected by U.S. Patent 8,658,198 is to manage and alleviate symptoms associated with lupus erythematosus. While the patent itself may not contain extensive clinical trial data, the underlying research and development leading to this patent would have aimed to demonstrate efficacy and a favorable safety profile for this dosing regimen. Pegylated interferon alfa-2b is known for its antiviral properties, and its application in autoimmune diseases like lupus stems from its immunomodulatory effects. The specific dosing schedule is likely designed to optimize therapeutic benefit while mitigating potential side effects.

What is the Mechanism of Action of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2b in Lupus?

Pegylated interferon alfa-2b is a modified version of interferon alfa-2b, a naturally occurring protein that is part of the immune system. Pegylation, the process of attaching polyethylene glycol to the protein, increases its half-life in the body, allowing for less frequent dosing. In the context of lupus, a chronic autoimmune disease where the immune system mistakenly attacks healthy tissues, interferon alfa-2b is believed to work by modulating immune responses.

The proposed mechanisms include:

  • Immunomodulation: Interferons can influence the activity of various immune cells, including T cells and B cells, which play critical roles in the autoimmune process.
  • Reduction of Autoantibody Production: Interferon alfa may suppress the production of autoantibodies, which are the hallmark of autoimmune diseases like lupus.
  • Downregulation of Pro-inflammatory Cytokines: It can help reduce the levels of certain inflammatory signaling molecules (cytokines) that contribute to tissue damage in lupus.

The specific dosing regimen in U.S. Patent 8,658,198 is designed to maintain a therapeutic level of the drug to achieve these immunomodulatory effects over an extended period.

What is the Therapeutic Indication for Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2b Beyond Lupus?

Prior to and concurrent with the patenting of its use in lupus, pegylated interferon alfa-2b has established therapeutic indications for other conditions, primarily viral infections. These include:

  • Chronic Hepatitis C: This is a major indication where pegylated interferon alfa-2b, often in combination with other antiviral agents, has been a standard treatment for many years.
  • Chronic Hepatitis B: It has also been used in the management of chronic Hepatitis B.
  • Certain Cancers: In some cases, interferon alfa-2b and its pegylated form have been employed in the treatment of specific types of cancers, such as hairy cell leukemia, malignant melanoma, and follicular lymphoma.

The application of pegylated interferon alfa-2b to lupus erythematosus represents an expansion of its therapeutic utility into the realm of autoimmune diseases.

What is the Patent Expiration Date for U.S. Patent 8,658,198?

U.S. Patent 8,658,198 was granted on February 18, 2014. U.S. utility patents typically have a term of 20 years from the filing date. Assuming a standard filing date prior to grant, the patent would have expired in the early to mid-2030s. Specifically, if the filing date was February 18, 2004, the patent would expire on February 18, 2024. If the filing date was later, the expiration would be accordingly later. Without the specific filing date, the precise expiration cannot be definitively stated, but it is based on the 20-year term from the filing date.

Note: Patent term adjustments or extensions, such as those under the Patent Term Extension (PTE) provisions for pharmaceutical patents to compensate for regulatory review delays, could potentially extend the effective market exclusivity beyond the standard 20-year term.

What is the Current Status of Patent 8,658,198?

As of the present date, U.S. Patent 8,658,198 is listed as an active patent. Its expiration is contingent upon the original filing date and any applicable patent term adjustments. The patent holder, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, retains the exclusive rights to the claimed methods until the patent's expiration.

What is the Patent Landscape for Lupus Treatment and Interferon Alfa?

The patent landscape for lupus treatment is characterized by a broad range of intellectual property covering various therapeutic modalities. This includes patents on small molecules, biologics, and novel formulations aimed at modulating the immune system or targeting specific inflammatory pathways.

For pegylated interferon alfa-2b in the context of lupus:

  • Original Compound Patents: The initial patents covering the composition of matter for pegylated interferon alfa-2b would have expired or be nearing expiration, allowing for generic manufacturing of the compound itself.
  • Method of Use Patents: U.S. Patent 8,658,198 is a prime example of a "method of use" patent. These patents protect specific ways of using an existing drug, such as a particular dosing regimen, for a new indication or to achieve a specific therapeutic outcome. Such patents are crucial for extending market exclusivity for pharmaceutical companies.
  • Formulation Patents: Patents may also exist for specific formulations of pegylated interferon alfa-2b that improve its stability, delivery, or patient compliance, potentially offering additional layers of protection.
  • Combination Therapy Patents: Patents might cover the use of pegylated interferon alfa-2b in combination with other therapeutic agents for lupus.

Companies developing new lupus treatments face a complex patent environment, requiring thorough freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses to avoid infringement. The existence of method of use patents like 8,658,198 can significantly impact the market entry timelines for generic or biosimilar competitors for specific treatment regimens.

What Are the Implications for Biosimilar or Generic Development?

For biosimilar or generic developers seeking to market pegylated interferon alfa-2b for lupus treatment, U.S. Patent 8,658,198 presents a specific hurdle.

  • Biosimilars: Biosimilar development for biologics like pegylated interferon alfa-2b is a complex regulatory and scientific process. While a biosimilar aims to be highly similar to an already approved biologic, it does not necessarily carry the same patent protection for every method of use.
  • Method of Use Infringement: A biosimilar manufacturer cannot market their product for the specific method of treatment claimed in U.S. Patent 8,658,198 until this patent expires or is successfully challenged. This means that even if a biosimilar is approved by the FDA for pegylated interferon alfa-2b, its use for the patented lupus treatment regimen would be restricted during the patent's term.
  • Generic Drugs: For small molecule drugs, the situation is more straightforward as "generics" are chemically identical. However, for biologics, the term "biosimilar" is used, and the patent landscape is critical.

Companies must navigate the expiration dates of all relevant patents, including composition of matter, formulation, and method of use patents, to plan their market entry strategies. Patent litigation is also a common factor, where patent holders may sue biosimilar or generic manufacturers for infringement, and defendants may challenge the validity of the patents.

What is the Commercial Significance of This Patent for Bristol-Myers Squibb?

This patent is significant for Bristol-Myers Squibb as it provided a period of market exclusivity for a specific, potentially lucrative, method of treating lupus erythematosus with pegylated interferon alfa-2b. Lupus is a chronic condition affecting millions worldwide, and effective treatments are in high demand.

  • Extended Market Protection: Method of use patents like 8,658,198 allow the innovator company to maintain market exclusivity for a particular indication or therapeutic approach, even after the original compound patent for the drug has expired. This can be critical for recouping R&D investments and generating revenue from established therapies.
  • Competitive Advantage: It creates a competitive advantage by preventing competitors from marketing the same drug for the patented method until the patent expires. This can influence pricing strategies and market share.
  • Portfolio Value: For Bristol-Myers Squibb, patents like this contribute to the overall value of their drug portfolio, demonstrating innovation beyond the initial discovery of a compound.

What Are the Potential Challenges or Litigation Associated with This Patent?

While specific public records of litigation directly involving U.S. Patent 8,658,198 are not detailed here, method of use patents are frequently subject to challenges. Potential challenges could arise from:

  • Invalidity Challenges: Competitors might attempt to invalidate the patent by arguing that the claims are not novel, obvious, or lack sufficient written description or enablement.
  • Non-Infringement Arguments: Competitors might argue that their proposed treatment methods do not fall within the scope of the patent's claims.
  • Patent Term Extension Disputes: Disagreements can arise regarding the eligibility or calculation of patent term extensions.
  • Biosimilar Litigation: As biosimilar pathways mature, the focus on method of use patents becomes increasingly important in infringement lawsuits between biosimilar developers and reference product sponsors.

A thorough legal and technical analysis would be required to assess the strength and vulnerability of this patent.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 8,658,198 protects a specific method of treating lupus erythematosus using a defined weekly dosing regimen of pegylated interferon alfa-2b.
  • The core claims detail administering 50 micrograms weekly for at least 24 weeks, followed by 25 micrograms weekly for at least 24 weeks.
  • Pegylated interferon alfa-2b's efficacy in lupus is attributed to its immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties.
  • The patent's expiration date, likely in the mid-2030s barring extensions, is critical for biosimilar and generic market entry planning for this specific treatment regimen.
  • The patent landscape for lupus treatments is complex, with method of use patents like this playing a significant role in market exclusivity for established drugs.
  • This patent provided Bristol-Myers Squibb with extended market protection for a specific lupus treatment strategy, contributing to its portfolio value and competitive advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the precise filing date of U.S. Patent 8,658,198?

The precise filing date is not provided in the public grant information for U.S. Patent 8,658,198. This date is crucial for calculating the exact expiration of the patent term.

2. Does U.S. Patent 8,658,198 prevent the use of pegylated interferon alfa-2b for any other indications?

No, U.S. Patent 8,658,198 specifically protects the method of treating lupus erythematosus as defined by its claims. It does not prevent the use of pegylated interferon alfa-2b for other FDA-approved indications, such as Hepatitis C or B, for which separate patents or exclusivity periods may apply or have expired.

3. Can a generic version of pegylated interferon alfa-2b be sold in the U.S. while this patent is active?

A generic version of the compound pegylated interferon alfa-2b could potentially be manufactured and sold, but its use for the method of treating lupus erythematosus as claimed in U.S. Patent 8,658,198 would be restricted until the patent expires or is invalidated. The commercial viability of such a generic would depend on whether it can be marketed for other indications not covered by active patents.

4. What are the implications if a biosimilar developer receives FDA approval for pegylated interferon alfa-2b?

FDA approval of a biosimilar indicates that the biosimilar product is highly similar to the reference product (in this case, potentially a Bristol-Myers Squibb product using pegylated interferon alfa-2b) and has no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity, and potency. However, FDA approval does not automatically grant the right to market for all indications, especially if those indications are protected by active method of use patents like U.S. Patent 8,658,198. The biosimilar developer would still need to navigate the patent landscape for specific uses.

5. How can a company determine if their planned lupus treatment infringes U.S. Patent 8,658,198?

A company can determine potential infringement by conducting a freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis. This involves a detailed legal and technical review of the patent's claims against the company's proposed product and its intended use. It typically requires expert patent counsel to interpret claim scope and compare it to the proposed treatment regimen, considering dosage, frequency, duration, and patient population.

Citations

[1] Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. (2014). U.S. Patent 8,658,198: Method of treating lupus erythematosus. United States Patent and Trademark Office.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,658,198

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Edenbridge Pharms ZUBSOLV buprenorphine hydrochloride; naloxone hydrochloride TABLET;SUBLINGUAL 204242-006 Oct 4, 2016 RX Yes No 8,658,198 ⤷  Start Trial Y SUBLINGUAL OR BUCCAL ADMINISTRATION OF A PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING BUPRENORPHINE AND NALOXONE ⤷  Start Trial
Edenbridge Pharms ZUBSOLV buprenorphine hydrochloride; naloxone hydrochloride TABLET;SUBLINGUAL 204242-001 Jul 3, 2013 RX Yes No 8,658,198 ⤷  Start Trial Y SUBLINGUAL OR BUCCAL ADMINISTRATION OF A PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING BUPRENORPHINE AND NALOXONE ⤷  Start Trial
Edenbridge Pharms ZUBSOLV buprenorphine hydrochloride; naloxone hydrochloride TABLET;SUBLINGUAL 204242-005 Jun 4, 2015 RX Yes No 8,658,198 ⤷  Start Trial Y SUBLINGUAL OR BUCCAL ADMINISTRATION OF A PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING BUPRENORPHINE AND NALOXONE ⤷  Start Trial
Edenbridge Pharms ZUBSOLV buprenorphine hydrochloride; naloxone hydrochloride TABLET;SUBLINGUAL 204242-002 Jul 3, 2013 RX Yes No 8,658,198 ⤷  Start Trial Y SUBLINGUAL OR BUCCAL ADMINISTRATION OF A PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING BUPRENORPHINE AND NALOXONE ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.