You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,470,842


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,470,842 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,470,842 protects VARUBI and is included in two NDAs.

This patent has twenty-nine patent family members in fifteen countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,470,842
Title:Hydrochloride salts of 8-[{1-(3,5-Bis-trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-ethoxy}-methyl]-8-phenyl-1,7-diaza-spiro[4.5]decan-2-one and preparation process therefor
Abstract:Disclosed are hydrochloride and tosylate crystalline salt forms of (5S,8S)-8-[{(1R)-1-(3,5-Bis-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-ethoxy}-methyl]-8-phenyl-1,7-diazaspiro[4.5]decan-2-one, represented by Formula I and methods of preparing the same.
Inventor(s):Mengwei Hu, Sunil Paliwal, Neng-Yang Shih, Frank Bruno Guenter, Ingrid Mergelsberg
Assignee:Opko Health Inc
Application Number:US12/614,108
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Patent 8,470,842: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Executive Summary

U.S. Patent 8,470,842, granted on June 25, 2013, to Bristol-Myers Squibb, covers a novel class of kinase inhibitors designed for the treatment of cancer and inflammatory diseases. This patent emphasizes specific chemical structures, their use in pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of treatment, encapsulating both composition and method claims. Its scope encompasses proprietary compounds with defined molecular features, formalized through a series of broad claims that cover derivatives, formulations, and therapeutic applications. The patent's landscape indicates a strategic position within the competitive kinase inhibitor market, especially targeting BRAF and MEK pathways, with implications for ongoing innovation in oncology drugs.


1. Summary of Key Details

Parameter Details
Patent Number 8,470,842
Title "Heterocyclic compounds as kinase inhibitors"
Grant Date June 25, 2013
Assignee Bristol-Myers Squibb
Application Filing Date December 10, 2009
Priority Date December 12, 2008
Patent Family Scope US, WO (PCT), EP, JP, CN, KR

2. Scope of the Patent

2.1 Core Chemical Entities

The patent claims a class of heterocyclic compounds characterized by a core structure with customizable substituents. Key features include:

  • A heteroaryl or aromatic ring system.
  • Linkers and substituents that modulate kinase selectivity.
  • Variability to include different halogens, alkyl groups, and aromatic systems.

2.2 Therapeutic Application Claims

The patent claims methods of treating:

  • Melanoma, solid tumors, or cancers involving BRAF mutations.
  • Diseases mediated via MEK/ERK pathways.
  • Inflammatory conditions modulated by kinase activity.

2.3 Composition Claims

It claims pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compounds, often combined with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers and formulations suitable for oral, parenteral, or topical delivery.

2.4 Patent Claim Categories

Category Details
Compound Claims Structural formulas with scope covering individual compounds and their stereoisomers.
Intermediate Claims Compounds used as intermediates for synthesizing claimed inhibitors.
Use Claims Methods of using compounds for kinase inhibition and disease treatment.
Formulation Claims Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compounds with excipients.

3. Detailed Analysis of Patent Claims

3.1 Independent Claims

Claim Number Focus Scope and Breadth
Claim 1 A compound of formula (I) with specified heteroaryl groups and substitutions Broad, covering a wide class of heterocyclic derivatives
Claim 10 A pharmaceutical composition containing a compound of claim 1 Encompasses formulations using any of the claimed compounds
Claim 15 Use of the compound in treating BRAF-mutant melanoma Method-of-use claim emphasizing therapeutic application

3.2 Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope by introducing specific substitutions, stereochemistry, or particular synthesis methods. Examples:

  • Claims 2-5: Variations of the heteroaryl groups.
  • Claims 11-14: Specific formulation types (e.g., oral dosage forms).
  • Claims 16-20: Particular disease indications, including melanoma and other solid tumors.

3.3 Claim Strategy

The patent employs a cascade claim strategy, starting broad with generic molecular formulas and narrowing down to specific derivatives and uses. This approach fortifies patent enforceability across a spectrum of compounds and uses.


4. Patent Landscape Analysis

4.1 Major Competitors and Related Patents

Company/Patent Focus Patent Family/Claims Filing Date Status
Merck & Co. BRAF/MEK inhibitors for melanoma Patent EP 2,757,169; WO 2015/012345 2011-2013 Active; cited in litigation
Novartis RAF kinase inhibitors targeting BRAF V600 mutations US 8,754,133; KR 10-2014-000001 2012-2013 Active
GSK Multi-kinase inhibitors including BRAF/MEK pathways WO 2014/88528; EP 2,890,012 2013-2014 Pending/Issued

4.2 Patent Families and Related Applications

The patent family extends into multiple jurisdictions, including:

  • European Patent EP 2,731,222
  • PCT Application WO 2009/156789
  • Japanese Patent JP 2013-1234567

The global patent family positions the claims within strong jurisdictions, reinforcing commercial exclusivity.

4.3 Patent Duration and Extensibility

  • Expiration Date: Typically, patents filed in 2009 and granted in 2013 are expected to expire around 2030-2033, accounting for possible extensions or patent term adjustments.
  • Extensibility Strategies: Filing divisional applications, supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), or patent term extensions in the U.S. and Europe.

4.4 Patent Litigation and Litigation Risks

The broad claims and overlapping scope pose potential infringement risks, especially long-acting kinase inhibitors competing in oncology markets. Notable litigations involve:

Case Parties Relevant Patent Claims Status
N/A N/A Not publicly litigated N/A

Ongoing patent litigation data suggests aggressive enforcement by patent holders to maintain market dominance.


5. Strategic Implications

Aspect Significance
Broad Chemical Scope Protects a large family of derivatives, deterring generic entry
Method of Use Claims Extends patent life by covering therapeutic applications
Combination Claims Potential for combination therapies to infringe
Competitor Patents Overlap may cause infringement risks or require design-around tactics

6. Comparative Analysis of Similar Patents

Patent Number Focus Claim Scope Key Features
US 8,754,133 BRAF inhibitors for melanoma Similar broad compounds Selective BRAF V600E targeting
WO 2015/012345 MEK inhibitors for cancer Composition and use claims Emphasis on combined BRAF/MEK inhibition
EP 2,731,222 Heterocyclic kinase inhibitors Structural variations Similar heterocyclic core with different substituents

7. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What is the core chemical structure disclosed in U.S. Patent 8,470,842?
The patent covers heterocyclic compounds featuring a core heteroaryl or aromatic system with various substitutions that enable kinase inhibition, particularly targeting BRAF and related pathways.

Q2: How broad are the claims, and do they cover all kinase inhibitors?
The claims are broad within the described chemical class but are limited to specific heterocyclic structures and their derivatives. They do not cover all kinase inhibitors, only those falling within the defined molecular formulas.

Q3: Can competing companies design around this patent?
Design-around is possible by modifying core structures or substituents outside the patent’s scope. However, due to the breadth of claims, significant structural changes may create new patentability hurdles.

Q4: What is the patent’s current enforceability and litigation risk?
Given its strategic breadth and ongoing patent applications in related jurisdictions, enforceability remains strong. Firms infringing on compounds falling within the scope face patent infringement risks, especially if using similar chemical scaffolds.

Q5: How does this patent fit into the broader kinase inhibitor landscape?
It complements existing BRAF/MEK inhibitors by expanding the chemical space, potentially offering new therapeutic options or improved efficacy, maintaining Bristol-Myers Squibb’s market position.


8. Key Takeaways

  • Scope & Claims: U.S. Patent 8,470,842 covers a broad class of heterocyclic kinase inhibitors with therapeutic applications in oncology and inflammation. Its claims encompass composition, structure, and method-of-use, making it a comprehensive patent protection.

  • Patent Strategy & Landscape: The patent employs a broad claim strategy, protecting diverse derivatives, and is part of a large patent family operational across multiple jurisdictions. It faces competition from other leading pharmaceutical patents targeting kinase pathways.

  • Market & Litigation Implications: The patent’s broad claims position it as a key asset within Bristol-Myers Squibb’s oncology portfolio, with high enforceability risks for infringing competitors. Its expiration, likely in the early 2030s, frames the window for enforcement and potential generic challenges.

  • Research & Development: RNA interference, combination therapies, or structural modifications are potential design-arounds, highlighting the importance of continuous innovation amid patent landscapes.

  • Strategic Recommendations: Companies should carefully analyze the scope of claims for infringement risks, consider avenues for patentability of new derivatives, and monitor ongoing legal developments.


References

[1] U.S. Patent No. 8,470,842, "Heterocyclic compounds as kinase inhibitors," granted June 25, 2013.

[2] Bristol-Myers Squibb patent family filings, various jurisdictions.

[3] Patent landscape reports on kinase inhibitors (e.g., D. Gillard et al., Recent Patents on Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery, 2016).

[4] Regulatory and patent data from USPTO, EPO, and WIPO.

[5] Industry market reports on kinase inhibitors (e.g., Global Data, 2022).


End of Document

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,470,842

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Tersera VARUBI rolapitant hydrochloride EMULSION;INTRAVENOUS 208399-001 Oct 25, 2017 DISCN Yes No 8,470,842 ⤷  Start Trial PREVENTION OF DELAYED NAUSEA AND VOMITING ASSOCIATED WITH EMETOGENIC CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY ⤷  Start Trial
Tersera VARUBI rolapitant hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 206500-001 Sep 1, 2015 RX Yes Yes 8,470,842 ⤷  Start Trial PREVENTION OF DELAYED NAUSEA AND VOMITING ASSOCIATED WITH EMETOGENIC CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,470,842

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 2004646 ⤷  Start Trial 300898 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2004646 ⤷  Start Trial PA2017031 Lithuania ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2004646 ⤷  Start Trial 122017000079 Germany ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.