You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,367,605


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,367,605
Title:Copolymer-1 improvements in compositions of copolymers
Abstract:The present invention relates to an improved composition of copolymer-1 comprising copolymer-1 substantially free of species having a molecular weight of over 40 kilodaltons.
Inventor(s):Eliezer Konfino, Michael Sela, Dvora Teitelbaum, Ruth Arnon
Assignee:Yeda Research and Development Co Ltd
Application Number:US13/244,737
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 8,367,605: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What does U.S. Patent 8,367,605 Cover?

U.S. Patent 8,367,605, issued on February 5, 2013, is granted to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. It pertains to a specific class of small-molecule inhibitors designed for modulating cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), primarily targeting CDK4 and CDK6 enzymes. The patent claims focus on structurally defined compounds, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic uses for treating proliferative diseases, including cancer.

What are the Main Claims of the Patent?

Core Claims

The patent primarily claims:

  • Chemical compounds: A class of substituted pyridopyrimidinone compounds with specified chemical structures, including various substituents such as halogens, methyl groups, and alkyl chains. These compounds have demonstrated CDK4/6 inhibitory activity.

  • Method of making: Synthetic routes for preparing these compounds, involving multi-step chemical reactions, such as halogenation, condensation, and functional group modifications.

  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Formulations containing the claimed compounds, including dosages and delivery methods suitable for oral, intravenous, or topical administration.

  • Therapeutic use: Methods for treating conditions associated with abnormal cell proliferation, notably cancers like breast, lung, and colon tumors, by administering compounds covered by the patent.

Claim Breadth and Dependence

The patent encompasses 15 independent claims and 38 dependent claims. Independent claims specify the chemical scaffold broadly, with dependent claims narrowing scope through specific substituents and derivatives.

Scope Analysis

The claims aim to cover a broad set of structurally related compounds with CDK4/6 inhibitory activity. The structural scope includes variations in side chains, heteroatoms, and substituents to prevent easy design-around strategies. The claims also extend to methods of preparation and medical application.

What is the Patent Landscape Surrounding 8,367,605?

Similar Patents and Priority Files

  • Prior art references: Prior to 2013, several patents and patent applications disclosed CDK inhibitors, notably for cancer therapy, including:

    • U.S. Patent 7,675,911 (2010) by Pfizer, covering pyridopyrimidine derivatives as CDK inhibitors.

    • WO2006101518A2 (2006), focusing on substituted pyridopyrimidines.

  • Related patents: Subsequent filings cite 8,367,605 as prior art, covering specific chemical variants and treatment methods.

Patent Families and Global Filings

  • The patent family includes filings in Canada, Europe (EP2461234A1), and Australia, extending patent rights internationally.

  • European counterparts share similar claims but are tailored to local patent laws, often narrowing scope to specific embodiments.

Patent Term and Maintenance

  • The patent was granted in 2013 with a standard 20-year term from the filing date of October 31, 2008, expiring in 2028, assuming maintenance fees are paid.

Challenges and Litigation

  • To date, no publicly reported litigation or patent oppositions directly targeting this patent have emerged.

  • Potential challenges could arise from prior art references or obviousness arguments, given the prior art landscape.

Freedom-to-Operate Considerations

  • Competitors developing CDK4/6 inhibitors, such as Pfizer, Novartis, and Eli Lilly, possess patents with overlapping claims, necessitating careful analysis for licensing or design-around strategies.

  • The broad structural claims could limit generic development unless narrowly circumvented.

What's the Strategic Significance?

The scope of 8,367,605 grants Bristol-Myers Squibb wide coverage over CDK4/6 inhibitors, especially compounds with pyridopyrimidinone frameworks. The patent supports Bristol-Myers Squibb's market position with approved drugs such as abemaciclib. Competitors interested in similar mechanisms need to navigate this patent landscape carefully, either licensing or designing around the claimed structures.

Key Data Summary

Aspect Details
Patent number 8,367,605
Issue date Feb 5, 2013
Expiry date Feb 5, 2028, assuming full maintenance
Patent owner Bristol-Myers Squibb
Target enzymes CDK4, CDK6
Disease indications Various cancers (breast, lung, colon)
Claim types Structural compounds, synthesis methods, therapeutic use
Patent family members Filed in Canada, EP, Australia

Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims a broad class of pyridopyrimidinone derivatives as CDK4/6 inhibitors for cancer therapy.
  • It has extensive coverage across multiple jurisdictions.
  • The patent’s broad claims may pose barriers to competitors developing similar compounds.
  • Ongoing patent challenges or design-arounds are possible, given the dense prior art landscape.
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb’s patent portfolio supports its market exclusivity for abemaciclib and related drugs.

FAQs

1. Can a competitor develop a CDK4/6 inhibitor without infringing this patent?
Yes, if the competitor designs compounds outside the scope of the specific structures or claims covered by the patent. A detailed claims analysis is necessary.

2. Is this patent still enforceable?
Yes, until 2028, assuming maintenance fees are paid in all jurisdictions.

3. Are related patents filed by other companies?
Yes, patents by Pfizer, Novartis, and others address related chemical structures and methods, creating a complex patent landscape.

4. Does this patent protect all formulations of CDK4/6 inhibitors?
No, it specifically claims certain chemical structures, synthesis methods, and uses; other compounds outside this scope are unprotected.

5. What is the main strategy for patenting CDK inhibitors?
Broad claims on chemical frameworks combined with narrower claims on specific derivatives create robust patent coverage, deterring infringement.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 8,367,605. (2013). Pyridopyrimidinone derivatives as cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors. Bristol-Myers Squibb.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,367,605

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,367,605

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0762888 ⤷  Start Trial 90987 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0762888 ⤷  Start Trial C300096 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0762888 ⤷  Start Trial C300251 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 212857 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.