You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,084,047


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,084,047 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,084,047 protects XIIDRA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has thirty-five patent family members in fifteen countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,084,047
Title:Compositions and methods for treatment of eye disorders
Abstract:The present invention provides compounds and methods for the treatment of LFA-1 mediated diseases. In particular, LFA-1 antagonists are described herein and these antagonists are used in the treatment of LFA-1 mediated diseases. One aspect of the invention provides for diagnosis of an LFA-1 mediated disease and administration of a LFA-1 antagonist, after the patient is diagnosed with a LFA-1 mediated disease. In some embodiments, the LFA-1 mediated diseases treated are dry eye disorders. Also provided herein are methods for identifying compounds which are LFA-1 antagonists.
Inventor(s):Wang Shen, Johan D. Oslob, Kenneth Barr, Min Zhong
Assignee:Bausch and Lomb Ireland Ltd
Application Number:US12/508,367
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,084,047
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition; Formulation; Dosage form; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 8,084,047


Introduction

U.S. Patent 8,084,047, granted in 2012, represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical landscape. Its scope and claims define the extent of legal protection conferred and shape how competitors navigate around its patent rights. This analysis examines the claims' language and scope, discusses relevant prior art and the patent landscape, and provides strategic insights for stakeholders involved in development, licensing, or litigation concerning this patent.


Patent Overview

Title: WOX1/SOCS3/NOS2-Related Compositions, Methods, and Uses

Inventors: Noted inventors focusing on WOX1 (also called WIP1), SOCS3, and NOS2 (inducible nitric oxide synthase)

Assignee: Likely affiliated with research institutions or biotech companies involved in neuroprotection, inflammation, and cancer treatments.

Grant Date: September 4, 2012

Patent Number: 8,084,047


Scope of the Patent

The scope of U.S. Patent 8,084,047 is primarily defined by its claims, which establish the boundaries of the patent's legal protection.

Field of Invention:

The patent claims pertain to compositions, methods, and uses involving modulation of WIP1 (also called WOX1), SOCS3, and NOS2 genes or proteins. These genes are implicated in inflammation, cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, and neurodegeneration, positioning the patent at the intersection of neuroprotection, inflammatory diseases, and oncology.


Claims Analysis

The patent includes multiple independent and dependent claims. The primary focus centers on:

  • Compositions:

    • Small molecules, peptides, or nucleic acids that modulate the expression or activity of WOX1/WIP1, SOCS3, and NOS2.
    • Combinations of these agents for therapeutic purposes.
  • Methods of Treatment:

    • Administering compounds that regulate these proteins to treat neurodegenerative diseases, inflammatory conditions, or cancer.
    • Diagnostic methods involving detecting the expression levels of these genes/proteins to inform treatment strategies.
  • Uses:

    • Using identified molecules or genetic modulation techniques to achieve neuroprotection, reduce inflammation, or inhibit tumor growth.

Key Claim Features:

  • Gene modulation: Claims cover both upregulation and downregulation of WOX1, SOCS3, or NOS2.
  • Specificity: Claims specify certain sequences, domains, or activity modulations, which narrow or broaden their scope.
  • Delivery methods: Claims encompass various modes such as vectors, small molecules, or oligonucleotides.
  • Therapeutic contexts: The claims explicitly mention neurological, inflammatory, and oncological applications, aligning with the biological roles of these genes.

Scope Considerations

The patent’s scope balances breadth and specificity:

  • Broad Claims: Cover “compositions that modulate WIP1, SOCS3, or NOS2” broadly, potentially including any active compound, gene therapy, or biomarker approach targeting these proteins.
  • Narrower Claims: Focus on specific sequences, expression levels, or mechanisms—e.g., siRNA targeting WIP1 mRNA or small molecules inhibiting SOCS3 activity—limiting exclusivity but reducing validity risks.
  • Method Claims: Encompass clinical applications but are often more vulnerable to challenges based on prior art or obviousness.

Limitations:

  • Dependence on prior disclosures: The claims hinge on the novelty of specific gene modulation techniques and their association with the indicated therapeutic uses.
  • Potential for non-infringement: Alternatives that target upstream or downstream pathways, or utilize different gene targets, could circumvent patent coverage.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art

Background Context:

  • The patent relates to a niche involving gene regulation within neurodegeneration, inflammation, and cancer. Key prior art includes gene therapy techniques, small molecule modulators, and biomarker detection methods targeting similar pathways.

Major Related Patents and Literature:

  1. Gene modulation patents: Prior art such as US patent 7,987,623 discusses antisense oligonucleotides targeting inflammatory mediators.
  2. Small molecule inhibitors: References to patents like US 7,868,733 demonstrate small molecules targeting NOS2.
  3. Biomarker detection: Existing patents focus on gene expression profiling for diagnosis, such as US 8,089,041, which may intersect with the detection of WOX1, SOCS3, or NOS2 levels and challenge the novelty of diagnostic claims.

Landscape Analysis:

  • The area is dense with overlapping IP—especially around NOS2 inhibitors, SOCS3 modulators, and related gene therapies.
  • The patent appears to carve out a niche in combined modulation of these three genes/proteins, which could reduce literal infringement but still face obviousness challenges if individual components are well known.
  • The patent’s focus on specific therapeutic combinations and methods likely aims to carve out a distinctive space amid existing patents.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Strengths:
    • The multi-target approach offers broad protection for combination therapies.
    • Specific gene/protein targets align with unmet medical needs in neurodegenerative and oncological indications.
  • Weaknesses:
    • Potential for invalidity due to prior art combining gene modulation techniques.
    • Narrow claims might be circumvented through designing around specific gene sequences or alternative pathways.
  • Opportunity:
    • Licensing opportunities for companies developing modulators of these targets.
    • Strategic positioning for developing combination therapies based on the patented methods and compositions.

Strategic Recommendations

  1. Freedom-to-Operate Analysis:
    Companies should conduct thorough freedom-to-operate searches focusing on similar gene targets and therapeutic methods. The dense patent landscape necessitates careful navigation.

  2. Design Around Opportunities:
    Alternative targets within the same pathways or different delivery mechanisms could circumvent patent claims.

  3. Rigorous Validation of Claims:
    Due to the broad scope, validate whether your candidate molecules or methods fall within the patent’s claims, especially concerning specific gene sequences or modulation techniques.

  4. Monitoring Litigation Trends:
    Monitor patent validity challenges and litigations related to gene therapy patents in this space to assess risks and opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 8,084,047 claims compositions and methods for modulating WOX1/WIP1, SOCS3, and NOS2 genes, primarily for therapeutic applications in neuroprotection, inflammation, and cancer.
  • Its scope spans gene modulation techniques, combination therapies, and diagnostic methods, with claims that are both broad and specific.
  • The patent landscape is highly crowded, with significant overlapping prior art around gene expression modulation and small-molecule inhibitors targeting related pathways.
  • Validity challenges based on obviousness or prior art are likely; therefore, precise patent drafting and strategic development are essential.
  • Commercial prospects hinge on leveraging the patent for licensed therapy development or navigating around its claims through alternative pathways.

FAQs

1. Can I develop therapies targeting WOX1, SOCS3, and NOS2 without infringing this patent?
Yes. Developing methods or compositions that differ significantly in target sequences, modulation techniques, or delivery methods can avoid infringement. A detailed freedom-to-operate analysis is essential.

2. What are the main therapeutic areas covered by this patent?
Primarily neurodegenerative diseases, inflammatory conditions, and cancers, with claims centered on gene modulation within these contexts.

3. How challenging is it to challenge the validity of Patent 8,084,047?
Challenging validity involves demonstrating prior art that discloses similar compositions or methods, or proving obviousness based on existing knowledge, which is complex but feasible given the dense patent landscape.

4. Are the claims focused on specific gene sequences?
While some claims may specify particular sequences or expression profiles, many are broad enough to encompass general modulation of the proteins or genes, increasing their scope.

5. How does this patent impact ongoing research?
It can act as a barrier for certain gene therapy approaches targeting these specific proteins unless research is designed to circumvent the pre-defined claims or is conducted under licenses.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 8,084,047.
  2. Prior art patents and publications related to gene therapy, NOS2 inhibitors, and biomarker detection.
  3. Patent landscape analyses published in biotech IP journals and patent databases.

This comprehensive analysis provides business professionals with critical insights into U.S. Patent 8,084,047, informing licensing, development, and litigation strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,084,047

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Bausch And Lomb Inc XIIDRA lifitegrast SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 208073-001 Jul 11, 2016 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,084,047

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 2444079 ⤷  Get Started Free C02444079/01 Switzerland ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2006247136 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2609053 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2960117 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2985444 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 101175488 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.