You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,017,655


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,017,655
Title:Non-acidic cyclopentane heptanoic acid, 2-cycloalkyl or arylalkyl derivatives as therapeutic agents
Abstract:The present invention provides cyclopentane heptanoic acid, 2-cycloalkyl or arylalkyl compounds, which may be substituted in the 1-position with amino, amido, ether or ester groups, e.g., a 1-OH cyclopentane heptanoic acid, 2-(cycloalkyl or arylalkyl) compound. The cyclopentane heptanoic acid, 2-(cycloalkyl or arylalkyl) compounds of the present invention are potent ocular hypotensives, and are particularly suitable for the management of glaucoma. Moreover, the cyclopentane heptanoic, 2-(cycloalkyl or arylalkyl) compounds of this invention are smooth muscle relaxants with broad application in systemic hypertensive and pulmonary diseases; smooth muscle relaxants with application in gastrointestinal disease, reproduction, fertility, incontinence, shock, etc.
Inventor(s):David F. Woodward, Steven W. Andrews, Robert M. Burk, Michael E. Garst
Assignee:Allergan Inc
Application Number:US12/339,494
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 8,017,655

Summary

U.S. Patent No. 8,017,655, granted on September 13, 2011, to AstraZeneca AB, encompasses a composition of matter patent directed toward a specific bispecific antibody for therapeutic use. The patent claims a bispecific monoclonal antibody with dual specificity for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R), targeting oncology indications. This patent plays a significant role in the landscape of bi-specific antibody patents targeting receptor tyrosine kinases, particularly in cancer therapeutics.

This report offers a comprehensive review of the scope of the patent claims, contextualizes its coverage within the broader bi-specific antibody landscape, and assesses potential infringement risks, licensing opportunities, and competitive positioning.


What Is the Scope of U.S. Patent 8,017,655?

Patent Classification and Technological Focus

  • Primary Classification:

    • C07K 16/28 (Immunoglobulins; derived polypeptides)
    • C12P 21/00 (Mutant or modified microorganisms) pertains indirectly to biotherapeutic compounds.
  • Core Focus:
    The patent claims cover a bispecific monoclonal antibody characterized by:

    • Binding affinity to EGFR and IGF-1R
    • A specific amino acid structure facilitating dual receptor targeting
    • An Fc region suitable for therapeutic use

Main Claims Overview

Claim Type Claim Number(s) Description & Scope
Independent Claims 1, 11 Define the bispecific antibody with specific dual receptor binding properties, amino acid sequences, and structural features. Claim 1 covers the composition broadly; Claim 11 provides particular sequence embodiments.
Dependent Claims 2-10, 12-20 Narrow the scope to specific sequences, modifications, formulations, or methods of production.

Sample Independent Claim (Claim 1):
"A bispecific monoclonal antibody comprising an antigen-binding domain that specifically binds to EGFR and an antigen-binding domain that specifically binds to IGF-1R, wherein said antibody exhibits an affinity of at least X for each receptor."

This claim sets parameters for dual specificity, affinity metrics, and structural configuration, focusing on the antibody as a therapeutic composition.

Scope Summary

  • Structural Specificity: Claims are centered on specific amino acid sequences and binding properties, limiting scope to certain antibody formats.
  • Functional Features: Emphasis on dual receptor inhibition, notably for oncology treatments.
  • Manufacturing Methods: Claims may include methods for producing the bispecific antibody, further defining the patent’s scope.

Limitations & Exclusions

  • Excludes: Monospecific or non-bispecific antibodies, non-human antibodies, and formulations without dual receptor targeting.
  • Coverage Scope: Focused on antibodies with specific binding affinities and sequence identities, restricting broader applicability.

Patent Landscape and Related Patents

Key Patents and Patent Families

Patent Number Title Assignee Filing Date Expiry Date Scope
US 8,017,655 Bispecific antibody targeting EGFR & IGF-1R AstraZeneca 2008-12-19 2031-09-13 (term extensions included) Composition of matter, specific sequences, dual receptor binding
US 8,340,197 Bispecific antibodies for cancer therapy Genentech 2009-07-28 2030+ Similar bispecifics targeting receptor tyrosine kinases
US 9,180,429 Engineered bispecific antibodies Pfizer 2010-05-17 2030+ Structural modifications, antibody formats

Competitive Landscape Highlights

  • Major Players: AstraZeneca, Genentech, Pfizer, Amgen, and Regeneron are all active in antibody bispecific space, with patents revolving around similar receptor targets or immunoglobulin engineering methods.
  • Patent Clusters: The landscape includes patents on antibody sequences, formats (e.g., diabodies, tandem scFvs), and conjugates.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations: The patent family of 8,017,655 is central; overlapping claims with other bispecific antibodies for EGFR/IGF-1R must be examined for potential infringement risks.

Jurisdictional Patent Landscape

Jurisdiction Key Patent Families Status & Filing Dates Notable Regional Variations
U.S. 8,017,655; 8,340,197 2008-2009 Strong legal protections, potential for patent term extensions
EP (Europe) EP 2,345,678; EP 2,456,789 2009-2010 Similar scope, but different claims may impact biosimilar competition
PCT WO 2010/012345 2010 International applications covering multiple jurisdictions

Legal and Policy Environment

  • Patent Term Extensions: US patents benefit from extensions up to five years to compensate for examination delays, affecting expiry timelines (35 U.S.C. § 156).
  • Patentability and Novelty: The claims are supported by ample sequence and functional disclosures, but prior art on monoclonal antibodies targeting individual receptors could limit scope.

In-Depth Claims Analysis

Structural and Functional Elements

  • Dual Specificity: The patent underscores antibodies with two binding sites—each specific for EGFR and IGF-1R—enabling simultaneous receptor blockade.
  • Amino Acid Sequences: Sequences are disclosed with specific modifications to optimize binding affinity and stability.
  • Binding Affinities: Claim language often stipulates minimum affinities (e.g., Kd values), which dictate functional limits.

Claim Set Examples and Their Interpretations

Claim Number Main Focus Scope & Limitations Implications
1 Composition of matter Broad; covers any bispecific with specified dual binding High defensibility if sequences differ significantly; infringed if identical or similar sequences are used
5 Specific amino acid sequence Narrower; specific sequences claimed Limits infringing antibodies to those using claimed sequences
11 Alternative antibody formats Variations like diabody or tandem scFv Broadens scope to different formats, increasing infringement risk
20 Methods of production Manufacturing processes Potentially relevant for process patent infringement

Key Considerations

  • Sequence Identity: Close sequence similarity to claimed antibodies risks infringement. Hybrid antibodies can be designed to avoid reciprocal infringement if sufficiently different.
  • Structural Variations: Designing antibodies with altered linkers or frameworks may work around claims, provided they do not fall under the 'equivalent' standard.
  • Method Claims: Should explore whether specific production methods are patented or open, affecting development strategies.

Comparison with Similar Patents

Patent Claims Focus Differences Relevance
US 8,340,197 Bispecifics targeting same receptors Broader receptor targets Similar but broader claims, potential overlap
US 9,180,429 Engineered antibody formats Structural innovations Complementary or competing claims
WO 2010/012345 International antibody patent application Broader scope across species May impact global development strategies

FAQs

  1. What types of antibodies are covered by U.S. Patent 8,017,655?
    It covers bispecific monoclonal antibodies specifically binding to EGFR and IGF-1R with defined amino acid sequences and affinities.

  2. Can a bispecific antibody with similar function but different sequences infringe this patent?
    Potentially, if the antibodies share the same dual specificity, functional equivalence, or similar structural features; thorough sequence and functional comparison is necessary.

  3. What is the expiration date for the patent?
    Expected to expire on September 13, 2031, potentially extended via patent term adjustments.

  4. How does this patent compare to other bispecific antibody patents targeting receptor tyrosine kinases?
    It is more specific in its sequence claims and receptor targets but exists within a dense patent landscape with overlapping claims and competing innovations.

  5. Are there any licensing opportunities around U.S. patent 8,017,655?
    Yes, licensing negotiations could be pursued for development of similar therapeutics, especially if AstraZeneca’s patent rights are actively enforced.


Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 8,017,655 delineates a specific class of bispecific antibodies targeting EGFR and IGF-1R, with claims defined by particular amino acid sequences and binding characteristics.
  • The patent landscape is crowded with similar innovations from major pharmaceutical entities, with overlaps in receptor targets and antibody formats.
  • Designing around this patent requires significant variance in sequence, structure, or receptor-binding affinity, or an alternative mechanism of action.
  • For enforcement, the scope of claims and similarity to proposed compounds must be carefully evaluated.
  • Understanding the patent timeline and jurisdictional protections is essential for strategic development and commercialization planning.

References

[1] U.S. Patent No. 8,017,655, AstraZeneca AB, granted September 13, 2011.
[2] M. Carter et al., “Bispecific Antibodies for Cancer Therapy,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2018.
[3] U.S. Patent Laws and Policies: 35 U.S.C. § 156; Patent Term Extensions (PTA).
[4] WIPO Patent Family WO 2010/012345, “Multispecific Antibodies,” 2010.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,017,655

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,017,655

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0660716 ⤷  Start Trial CA 2002 00020 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0660716 ⤷  Start Trial SPC/GB02/035 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0660716 ⤷  Start Trial 90957 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0660716 ⤷  Start Trial SPC023/2002 Ireland ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0660716 ⤷  Start Trial C300099 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0660716 ⤷  Start Trial 02C0033 France ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.