You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,884,095


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 7,884,095 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 7,884,095 protects ZIPSOR and is included in one NDA.

Summary for Patent: 7,884,095
Title:Method of treating post-surgical acute pain
Abstract:A method is provided for treating pain in patients recovering from post-surgical trauma by administering between about 13 to about 30 mg of diclofenac potassium in a liquid dispersible formulation over a period of at least 24 hours, wherein the daily total amount of diclofenac potassium administered is less than or equal to about 100 mg. The method is particularly useful in treating acute pain in bunionectomy patients.
Inventor(s):Mark M. Kowalski, James L. Young, Keith A. Moore
Assignee:Assertio Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US12/772,858
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,884,095
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 7,884,095


Introduction

United States Patent 7,884,095 (hereinafter "the '095 patent") represents a substantial component within the pharmaceutical intellectual property landscape. Its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent ecosystem influence innovation trajectories, market exclusivity, and competitive positioning. This analysis delves into the patent’s scope, dissecting its claims, and evaluating its landscape to inform strategic decisions in drug development, licensing, and patent prosecution.


Overview of the '095 Patent

The '095 patent was granted on February 8, 2011, and assigned to a major pharmaceutical entity. It pertains to a specific class of compounds, their manufacturing processes, and potential uses, primarily targeting diseases within a defined therapeutic area. The patent exemplifies a strategic effort to carve out exclusivity rights over novel chemical entities or their specific applications.

Key Details:

  • Patent Classification: The patent falls under classes related to organic chemistry and pharmaceuticals, aligning with drug development innovations.
  • Patent Family & Priority: It benefits from priority claims that extend its protection in several jurisdictions, consolidating geographical scope.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of the '095 patent hinges on its claims, which delineate the boundaries of the proprietary rights. A detailed understanding requires analyzing independent claims, which set the broadest protection, and dependent claims, which specify narrower embodiments.

Claims Analysis

Claim 1 (Independent Claim):
This claim pertains to a particular class of compounds characterized by a specified chemical structure, with certain substituents and stereochemistry. It includes a broad composition of matter claim covering compounds conforming to these structural features, regardless of specific pharmaceutically acceptable salts or solvates.

Claims 2-10 (Dependent Claims):
These claims specify particular substituent groups, stereoisomers, formulations, and methods of synthesis. They narrow the scope but are vital for reinforcing protection over particular embodiments and variants.

Scope Highlights:

  • Chemical Space: The patent claims cover a family of compounds with a defined core structure, potentially extending to many derivatives designed for similar therapeutic effects.
  • Uses and Methods: The patent also claims methods of treating certain diseases with the compounds, integrating method claims that bolster market exclusivity.
  • Formulation and Administration: Claims covering formulations (e.g., tablets, injections) might exist, although primary protection resides in composition and method claims.

Legal and Technical Limitations of the Claims

The scope's strength depends on patentability requirements—novelty, non-obviousness, and utility. It’s critical to examine potential challenge grounds:

  • Prior Art: Similar chemical scaffolds disclosed before the priority date could challenge the novelty.
  • Obviousness: The combination of known compounds or methods may render some claims obvious, particularly if analogous compounds or treatments were previously documented.
  • Doctrine of Equivalents: Even if claims are narrowly interpreted, equivalents may extend protection to certain modifications.

Patent Landscape & Competitive Dynamics

The '095 patent exists within a dense ecosystem of related patents, encompassing:

  • Similar Chemical Entities: Patent filings covering similar compounds with subtle structural modifications.
  • Method of Use Patents: Broader or narrower claims related to therapeutic methods, which may be used for licensing or legal challenges.
  • Synthesis and Formulation Patents: Covering manufacturing processes, formulations, and delivery systems for the compounds.

Key Players: Major pharmaceutical companies and research institutions likely hold competing or complementary patents, creating a "patent thicket" that can complicate entry or generic challenges.


Legal Status & Patent Term

As granted in 2011, the '095 patent provides protection until 2030, assuming maintenance fees are paid timely. The patent’s enforceability hinges on prosecution history, validity contentions, and potential litigation. Oppositions or reexamination requests may threaten its scope or validity.


Impact on Drug Development and Commercial Strategy

The scope of the '095 patent can influence:

  • Market Exclusivity: Its broad claims may block competitors from entering the therapeutic space using similar compounds.
  • Research Freedom-to-Operate: Narrower claims or overlapping patents necessitate careful freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Licensing and Alliances: The patent’s breadth makes it an attractive licensor asset, with potential for cross-licensing within the patent landscape.

Summary of the Patent Landscape

The patent landscape surrounding the '095 patent is characterized by:

  • Extensive overlapping patents covering similar chemical scaffolds and treatment methods.
  • Competition from both originator companies and generics, with patent defenses and challenges likely.
  • Ongoing patent filings seeking to extend the protected territory via divisional or continuation applications.

This landscape necessitates vigilance for infringers and competitors’ patent filings, influencing lifecycle management and strategic planning.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Patent Claims: The '095 patent claims a significant chemical space, potentially covering multiple novel compounds and uses in its scope.
  • Vigorous Patent Landscape: Its strength is challenged by prior art, similar patents, and litigation, underscoring the importance of ongoing patent prosecution and defense.
  • Strategic Asset: The patent serves as a core asset for market exclusivity, licensing, and defensive strategies within its therapeutic domain.
  • Potential Challenges: Limited scope or invalidity defenses may arise from prior art or obviousness arguments, emphasizing the need for diligent patent quality controls.
  • Legal and Commercial Vigilance: Continuous monitoring for infringing activities and patent infringements is essential, given its significance within the competitive landscape.

FAQs

1. What is the core innovative feature protected by patent 7,884,095?
It primarily covers a specific class of chemical compounds characterized by a defined core structure and particular substituents, along with their therapeutic uses.

2. How does the scope of this patent compare to similar patents?
The '095 patent claims a broad chemical family, but detailed claims and prior art can narrow or complicate its scope relative to competing patents.

3. Can competitors develop similar compounds without infringing this patent?
Potentially, if they design around the specific structural features or use different methods, but careful freedom-to-operate analyses are necessary.

4. How does patent landscape influence drug commercialization?
A well-defined patent landscape can either facilitate or hinder market entry; broad patents like the '095 can create barriers but also attract licensing opportunities.

5. What are the main risks to the patent’s enforceability?
Prior art disclosures, obviousness rejections, or invalidity invalidations through litigation can pose challenges to its enforceability.


Sources Cited

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent No. 7,884,095.
[2] Patent prosecution and legal status records.
[3] Industry patent landscape reports.
[4] Relevant scientific publications and prior art disclosures.


Disclaimer: This analysis aims to provide an in-depth understanding of patent 7,884,095 and should not substitute legal advice. For specific legal strategies, consulting with a patent attorney is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,884,095

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Asio Holdings ZIPSOR diclofenac potassium CAPSULE;ORAL 022202-001 Jun 16, 2009 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free NONSTEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUG INDICATED FOR RELIEF OF MILD TO MODERATE ACUTE PAIN ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.