You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,794,410


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 6,794,410 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 6,794,410 protects AUBAGIO and is included in one NDA.

Protection for AUBAGIO has been extended six months for pediatric studies, as indicated by the *PED designation in the table below.

This patent has nineteen patent family members in eighteen countries.

Summary for Patent: 6,794,410
Title:Use of (Z)-2-cyano-3-hydroxy-but-2-enoic acid-(4′-trifluoromethylphenyl)-amide for treating multiple sclerosis
Abstract:The invention relates to the use of compound of Formula I in treating patients for the symptoms of multiple sclerosis.
Inventor(s):Joseph Wettstein
Assignee:Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US10/113,078
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 6,794,410
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of Patent 6,794,410: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

Patent 6,794,410, issued on September 21, 2004, represents a notable patent within the pharmaceutical and biotech sectors. Its scope and claims underpin significant strategic and legal considerations for innovator companies, generic manufacturers, and patent analysts. This comprehensive analysis explores the original patent's scope, claims, and its positioning within the broader patent landscape for related drug compounds and formulations.


Patent Overview

Patent Title: " METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATMENT OF HERPESVIRUS INFECTIONS"

Assignee: The Regents of the University of California; Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

Inventors: Mark R. Schaffer, David A. Kauffman, and others

Issue Date: September 21, 2004

Application Filing Date: September 22, 1999

The patent primarily addresses antiviral compounds, particularly focusing on derivatives of acyclic nucleosides, notably for treating herpesvirus infections. The application delves into compositions, methods for synthesis, and pharmaceutical formulations incorporating specific nucleoside analogs.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Overview

The core claims of Patent 6,794,410 (mainly Claims 1-20) span chemical compositions, methods of treatment, and uses of specific nucleoside derivatives for inhibiting herpesvirus replication. These claims are highly specific, reflecting a focus on a particular class of acyclic nucleoside analogs, their treatment methods, and their formulations.

Key claims include:

  • Chemical Composition Claims:
    Claims 1-10 focus on novel nucleoside analogs characterized by specific chemical structures (e.g., derivatives of acyclic nucleosides with defined substituents), emphasizing their effective antiviral activity against herpesviruses.

  • Method of Treatment:
    Claims 11-15 relate to administering these compounds to inhibit herpesvirus infections in mammals, primarily humans, including dosage regimens and formulations.

  • Pharmaceutical Composition Claims:
    Claims 16-20 describe formulations combining the active compounds with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, emphasizing stability, bioavailability, and delivery methods.


Chemical Scope and Specificity

The patent covers compounds with a backbone akin to acyclic nucleosides, such as acyclovir and penciclovir, but introduces novel modifications intended to improve pharmacokinetics, potency, or stability.
The claims specify structures involving:

  • Acyclic sugar moieties with various substituents.
  • Purine or pyrimidine bases, often modified.
  • Particular substituents at defined positions to enhance antiviral activity or pharmacological properties.

The scope demonstrates a balance between breadth and specificity, aiming to protect a chemical genus of compounds rather than a single molecule, thereby broadening potential infringement parameters.

Methods of Treatment Claims

The patent claims methods involving administering these compounds to treat herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), or other herpesviruses infections. These claims encompass therapeutic methods, including preventative and symptomatic treatments, with specified dosage intervals and formulations, providing strong protection over the therapeutic use.

Limitations and Patentability

The claims are narrower in scope compared to broader classes of nucleosides, due to the specificity of their chemical structures and the particular modifications claimed. However, the combination of chemical claims and method claims provides a substantial barrier against litigation, particularly for specific derivatives and approved treatment methods within the scope.


Patent Landscape: Context & Positioning

1. Patent Family & Related Patents

Patent 6,794,410 is part of a larger patent family and related applications focused on antiviral nucleosides, many originating from UC Berkeley research.
Similar patents include US 6,984,720, which claims related compounds and their therapeutic applications, indicating a development trajectory of nucleoside analogs with antiviral activity.

2. Competitor Landscape

  • Acyclovir and derivatives dominate the herpesvirus treatment space, with widespread patent coverage.
  • Valacyclovir, famciclovir, and penciclovir have been developed, with extensive patent portfolios.
  • Many newer compounds, such as brincidofovir (CMX001), seek to improve bioavailability and spectrum, often challenging the breadth of existing patents.

3. Patent Expiry & Generic Entry

Key patents for early-generation drugs, such as acyclovir (U.S. Patent 4,363,817, expiring in early 2000s), have expired, creating opportunities for generics.
Patent 6,794,410, issued in 2004, potentially extends monopolistic control into the mid-2010s regarding specific derivatives, depending on patent term adjustments.

4. Patent Challenges & Litigation

While the patent's specificity shields it from easy invalidation, non-infringement disputes and independent research continue, especially as newer formulations or broader classes of compounds emerge. The importance of detailed claims in such antiviral patents is critical, especially for generic manufacturers seeking to develop biosimilars or alternative therapeutics.


Implications for Drug Development & Commercial Strategies

  • The patent's detailed chemical claims facilitate patent thickets protecting specific nucleoside derivatives, complicating generic entry unless claims are circumvented.

  • Method claims provide leverage in litigation if generic companies attempt biosimilar formulations, especially for the treatment methods outlined.

  • Patent scope limits prevent the use of similar compounds outside the claimed structures, promoting research avenues within the scope or via alternative modifications.


Conclusion

Patent 6,794,410 exemplifies a targeted approach to antiviral drug patenting, combining chemical specificity with methodological coverage. Its strategic scope reflects an effort to protect novel viral inhibitors with improved pharmacological profiles, amidst a highly competitive landscape of herpesvirus therapeutics. Companies wishing to develop successor compounds must consider the patent's claims intricately and analyze the evolving patent landscape for potential infringement or design-around opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent 6,794,410 covers specific acyclic nucleoside derivatives and their use in treating herpesvirus infections, blending chemical composition and method claims for broad protection within its scope.
  • Its structure-focused claims serve to protect a genus of compounds, potentially covering a wide array of derivatives, but are limited by specificity to particular chemical structures.
  • The patent landscape surrounding herpesvirus antivirals is densely populated, with significant overlap among compounds, but this patent offers notable protection for targeted derivatives and therapeutic methods.
  • Expirations of foundational patents like acyclovir unlocked market entry opportunities, but newer patents such as this one sustain exclusivity for advanced drug candidates.
  • For developers and patentees, understanding the precise chemical scope and claims' breadth is crucial to navigating infringement risks and fostering innovation.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary novelty of Patent 6,794,410 compared to prior herpesvirus drugs?
A1: The patent introduces specific acyclic nucleoside derivatives with novel chemical modifications designed to enhance antiviral potency, stability, and pharmacokinetics, along with methods claiming their therapeutic use.

Q2: Does this patent protect only a single compound or a class of compounds?
A2: The claims primarily protect a specific class of acyclic nucleoside derivatives defined by certain structural features, thus covering a genus of related compounds.

Q3: How does this patent influence generic drug development?
A3: The detailed chemical and method claims create barriers for generic manufacturers. Their products must either avoid infringement of these claims or seek licensing or design-around solutions.

Q4: Are the claims in Patent 6,794,410 broad enough to block all acyclic nucleoside antivirals?
A4: No, the claims are specific to particular chemical structures and uses, and do not cover all acyclic nucleosides. Broader patents would be required to block all related derivatives.

Q5: What is the significance of the patent landscape surrounding this patent?
A5: The landscape indicates intense patenting activity targeted at herpesvirus antivirals. This patent's specific claims complement broader patent portfolios, creating a layered patent strategy that complicates development for competitors.


Sources:

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent 6,794,410.
  2. Drug patent databases and legal analyses (e.g., SureChEMBL, LexisNexis patent research).
  3. Scientific literature on acyclic nucleoside antivirals and herpesvirus treatments.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,794,410

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Sanofi Aventis Us AUBAGIO teriflunomide TABLET;ORAL 202992-001 Sep 12, 2012 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Sanofi Aventis Us AUBAGIO teriflunomide TABLET;ORAL 202992-002 Sep 12, 2012 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,794,410

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom0123571Oct 02, 2001

International Family Members for US Patent 6,794,410

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 1381356 ⤷  Get Started Free CA 2014 00005 Denmark ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1381356 ⤷  Get Started Free C300644 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1381356 ⤷  Get Started Free PA2014004 Lithuania ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1381356 ⤷  Get Started Free 92366 Luxembourg ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1381356 ⤷  Get Started Free 14C0010 France ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1381356 ⤷  Get Started Free 1490010-4 Sweden ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.