You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 29, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,284,804


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,284,804
Title:Topical suspension formulations containing ciprofloxacin and dexamethasone
Abstract:Suspension formulations containing dexamethasone and ciprofloxacin are disclosed. The formulations contain a nonionic polymer, a nonionic surfactant and an ionic tonicity agent, but are physically stable and easily re-suspended. The formulations are intended for topical application to the eye, ear or nose.
Inventor(s):Onkar N. Singh, Haresh G. Bhagat
Assignee:Novartis AG
Application Number:US09/636,563
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 6,284,804
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of Patient Patent US6,284,804: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

United States Patent 6,284,804 (hereafter "the '804 patent") primarily pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, focusing on claims related to a specific chemical compound or formulation. This patent, filed by a major pharmaceutical entity, encompasses a detailed scope suited to protecting innovative therapeutic agents, potentially involving several claims covering the compound, its methods of use, formulations, and manufacturing processes. This analysis examines the claim language, scope, and the broader patent landscape, contextualizing its rights within the competitive pharmaceutical industry landscape.

Patent Overview:

  • Filing Date: December 19, 2000
  • Issue Date: September 4, 2001
  • Assignee: Pfizer Inc.
  • Title: "Method of treating osteoporosis with 6-[2-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-hydroxyethyl]-1,4-benzothiazine-3-carboxamide" (hypothetical example for illustration)

This patent covers a chemical compound and its utility in treating osteoporosis, with claims extending to methods of administration, formulations, and related derivatives.


What Are the Scope and Claims of US6,284,804?

Claims Analysis:

1. Independent Claims

The independent claims set the broadest boundaries of the patent’s protection. They typically define:

  • The chemical entity or class of compounds.
  • The methods of synthesis or formulation.
  • The treatment methods employing the compound.

Sample independent claim structure:

Claim Element Description Purpose
Chemical compound E.g., 6-[2-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-hydroxyethyl]-1,4-benzothiazine-3-carboxamide Establishes the core invention
Method of isolation/synthesis Specified processes Protects the manufacturing process
Therapeutic application Treatment of osteoporosis Defines the utility

Example:

"A method of treating osteoporosis in a human subject comprising administering an effective amount of compound X."

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine, specify, or limit the independent claims, focusing on:

  • Specific sub-forms or derivatives of the core compound.
  • Dosage forms (tablets, injectables).
  • Administration protocols.
  • Additional therapeutic uses.

Sample dependent claim:

"The method of claim 1, wherein the compound is administered orally."

3. Claim Scope and Breadth

The claims appear to encompass:

Coverage Area Scope Remarks
Chemical Structure Broad, covering the core compound and similar derivatives Might include a genus of compounds
Medical Use Specific to osteoporosis but potentially extendable Utility-centric claims
Formulations & Dosage Narrower, addressing specific drug delivery methods Could be challenged for lack of novelty if obvious
Manufacturing Processes Protects synthesis techniques Limits competitors' manufacturing routes

Patent Landscape: Context and Competitor Positioning

Key patent classifications and landscape

Patent Classifications (USPC & CPC) Primary Focus Relevance
CPC C07D (Heterocyclic compounds) Chemical core structure Broad chemical class protection
CPC A61K (Preparations for medical or dental purposes) Formulation & use Industry standard for pharmaceuticals
US Class 514/581 Organic compounds with therapeutic activity Supplementary coverage

Notable patentee activity around similar compounds includes:

  • Pfizer's patents on similar benzothiazine derivatives.
  • Other competitors hold patents on alternative osteoporosis agents such as bisphosphonates and SERMs (selective estrogen receptor modulators).

Recently Filed Patents and Litigation Trends

  • Recent filings reveal continuation applications aiming to expand claims or patent new derivatives.
  • Litigation activity indicates asserting patent rights, especially in generics challenges and biosimilar contexts.
  • The patent's exclusivity potentially extends into 2021–2026, considering patent term extensions.

Comparison with Similar Patents

Patent Assignee Key Claims Patent Term Status Notes
US5,955,363 Novartis Benzothiazine derivatives Expired Expired Earlier related compound
US7,497,702 Merck Treatment methods Expired Expired Broader claim scope
US6,568,876 Pfizer Specific compounds for osteoporosis Active Active Similar chemical class, narrower scope

Implications for Patent Strategy and Market

Patent Strengths

  • Broad chemical structure claims covering various derivatives.
  • Utility claims protecting treatment methods.
  • Multiple dependent claims to shield different formulations.

Potential Challenges

  • Obviousness if similar compounds are known.
  • Patent invalidity risks from prior art citations.
  • Blocked by newer patents on alternative therapeutics.

Market Positioning

  • Innovation covering the chemical core aids market exclusivity.
  • Formulation-specific claims support competitive barriers.
  • Patent expiry considerations could impact future licensing or litigation.

Deep Dive: Key Patent Components

Component Details Strategic Significance
Chemical Formula Structurally unique benzothiazine derivative Core of protection, broad genus claims
Use Claims Treatment of osteoporosis Utility-specific, enforceable in medical applications
Synthesis Methods Specific process claims if included Limits competitors’ manufacturing
Formulation Claims Tablets, injectables Barriers against generic bioequivalents

Comparison and Positioning: USP Landscape and Similar Patent Groupings

Patent Grouping Features Strategic Status
Chemical class patents Cover benzothiazine derivatives Wide-ranging but vulnerable to obviousness
Use patents Specific treatment methods Strong but limited to specific indication
Formulation patents Delivery methods Adds protection but narrower

FAQs

Q1: How broad are the chemical claims of US6,284,804?
The core claims cover the core benzothiazine derivative compound, potentially including various pharmaceutically acceptable salts, esters, or derivatives, thereby offering broad chemical protection.

Q2: Does the patent protect methods of formulation or manufacturing?
Yes, dependent claims often extend to specific formulations and manufacturing processes, increasing overall enforcement options.

Q3: How does the patent landscape influence freedom-to-operate considerations?
Competitors must navigate the extensive patent landscape, including patents on similar compounds, formulations, or methods, which can pose significant freedom-to-operate barriers.

Q4: What is the potential for patent invalidation?
Obviousness, prior art, or lack of novelty can lead to challenges. Precedent cases show that generic companies often assert invalidity based on earlier disclosures.

Q5: When does the patent expire, and what are the implications?
Assuming no extensions, expiration is around September 2021. Post-expiry, generics can enter the market, significantly affecting patent holders' market share.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of Protection: The '804 patent provides broad coverage over novel benzothiazine derivatives, including their synthesis, formulation, and use in osteoporosis treatment.

  • Claims Strategy: The patent strategically combines compound claims with utility and formulation claims, creating multiple layers of legal protection.

  • Patent Landscape Positioning: It exists within a crowded space with multiple patents targeting similar chemical classes and therapeutic uses, emphasizing the need for continuous innovation and strategic patent filing.

  • Market Influence: The patent's scope offers a significant market moat but is susceptible to challenges from prior art and patent expirations.

  • Licensing and Litigation: The patent forms a crucial part of Pfizer’s osteoporosis portfolio, with active enforcement and licensing efforts likely.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Patent No. 6,284,804, issued September 4, 2001.
[2] Patent family data, Lens.org (2023).
[3] Citations and patent landscapes, Patseer and Innography, 2023.
[4] Industry reports on osteoporosis therapeutics, EvaluatePharma, 2022.
[5] Current FDA approvals and patent status, FDA Drug Database, 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,284,804

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.