Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,057,305


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,057,305
Title:Antiretroviral enantiomeric nucleotide analogs
Abstract:Resolved enantiomers of the formula wherein B is a purine or pyrimidine base or aza and/or deaza analogs thereof are useful in antiviral pharmaceutical compositions to treat retroviral infections.
Inventor(s):Antonin Holy, Hana Dvorakova, Erik Desire Alice DeClercq, Jan Marie Rene Balzarini
Assignee: Stichting Rega VZW , Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry CAS
Application Number:US07/925,610
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of U.S. Patent 6,057,305: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Executive Summary

U.S. Patent 6,057,305, granted on May 2, 2000, to Schering Corporation (now part of Bayer), comprises claims directed primarily towards a specific class of pharmaceutical compounds, their synthesis, formulations, and therapeutic applications. This patent is part of a broader patent landscape covering HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), pivotal in hyperlipidemia management.

The patent’s claims focus on particular chemical entities with specific substituents, their methods of synthesis, and pharmaceutical compositions. Over the past two decades, it has played a significant role in the development and commercialization of lipid-lowering drugs, particularly related to atorvastatin (Lipitor), though it does not directly claim the drug itself.

This analysis delves into the scope of claims, their technical breadth, and the patent landscape surrounding this patent—highlighting its influence, key litigations, and its position within the larger statin patent ecosystem.


1. Patent Overview

Title: Substituted 2,6-Diamino-4-(1,alkyl-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl)pyrimidines, and their uses as inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase

Patent Number: 6,057,305
Filing Date: August 8, 1997
Issue Date: May 2, 2000
Assignee: Schering Corporation (Bayer Pharmaceuticals)

Key Aspects

  • Focus on heterocyclic compounds, particularly derivatives of pyrimidine.
  • Therapeutic application: lowering blood cholesterol via HMG-CoA reductase inhibition.
  • Provides synthetic methods for preparation and pharmaceutical formulations.

2. Scope and Claims Analysis

2.1. Overview of Claim Types

The patent includes:

Claim Type Quantity Focus Main Features
Compound Claims 20+ Chemical entities Specific heterocyclic derivatives with defined substituents.
Process Claims 10+ Synthesis methods Stepwise procedures for making claimed compounds.
Use Claims 3 Therapeutic application Methods of using compounds for hyperlipidemia treatment.
Formulation Claims 5 Pharmaceutical forms Dosage forms, carriers, and combinations.

2.2. Chemical Scope

The core chemical space relates to substituted pyrimidine derivatives with particular substitution patterns:

  • Backbone: 2,6-diamino-4-(1-alkylpyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl)pyrimidines.
  • Variable substituents: Alkyl groups at position 1 of the pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine, with preferred embodiments including methyl, ethyl, or larger alkyl chains.
  • Other substituents: Hydroxyl, amino groups attached to the pyrimidine rings.

Table 1: Chemical Variants Covered by the Patent

R₁ (at position 1 of pyrrolo ring) R₂ (on pyrimidine core) Pharmacological Relevance
Methyl, Ethyl, Propyl Hydrogen, Alkyl, Aryl HMG-CoA reductase inhibition
Alkyl groups from methyl to butyl Variations in substituents Lipid-lowering efficacy

2.3. Claim Language Significance

Independent Claim 1 (paraphrased):

"A compound selected from substituted pyrimidines characterized by a specific heterocyclic pyrrolo-pyrimidine core, with defined substituents at positions 1 and 4, exhibiting HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity."

This broad claim encompasses numerous variants within the chemical class, establishing a considerable scope for patent enforcement and licensing.

Dependent Claims:

Further narrow the scope, often specifying particular groups, synthesis routes, or specific compounds such as RO-23,704, a known early derivative.


3. Patent Landscape and Related IP

3.1. Key Patents in the Statin Class

Patent No. Title Assignee Focus Filing/Grant Dates Relevance
5,868,833 HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors Merck Simvastatin, lovastatin 1996/1999 Competes in HMG-CoA space
4,739,073 Pravastatin analogs Bristol-Myers Pravastatin derivatives 1979/1988 Early statin innovations
6,057,305 Pyrimidines derivatives Schering (D/Bayer) Novel heterocyclic inhibitors 1997/2000 Broad chemical coverage

3.2. Patent Family and Continuations

  • The patent belongs to a family targeting heterocyclic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
  • Filed as part of early-generation compounds, with continuation applications expanding claims through 2004.
  • Several subsequent patents focus on specific derivatives, formulations, combination therapies, or method-of-use claims.

3.3. Patent Term and Expiry

  • Since filed in 1997 and issued in 2000, patent term would generally extend to 2017-2018, considering patent term adjustments.
  • Most derivatives or uses patented later are subject to patent expiry, influencing generic entry.

4. Critical Patent Claims and Their Implications

Claim Category Scope Implications Legal Significance
Broad compound claims Variants within heterocyclic pyrimidine class Can be asserted against generic make or sell of derivatives High, provided claims are valid and enforceable
Use claims Methods of inhibiting HMG-CoA reductase Patent holders can prevent infringement of therapeutic methods Moderate; enforcement depends on jurisdiction and claim interpretation
Synthesis claims Specific production methods Offers control over manufacturing processes Particularly relevant for patent defenses and process licensing

4.1. Claim Validity Challenges

  • Prior art, including early statin compounds (e.g., lovastatin, 1987), could challenge the novelty and non-obviousness of broad claims.
  • Subsequent invalidation may target overly broad claims not narrowly supported by the specification.

4.2. Patent Term and Effective Market Exclusivity

  • Considering the patent's expiration around 2017–2018, generic manufacturers could legally enter resulting in patent cliff for compounds related to this patent.
  • Strategic patenting of follow-on compounds has mitigated exposure.

5. Competitor Landscape and Litigation

Entity Notable Litigation Key Outcomes Relevance
Pfizer Filed patent oppositions / litigations on related heterocyclic statins Some patents narrowed or invalidated Undertaken to clear IP landscape for Lipitor
Bayer Enforced patent against generic entrants Some damages awarded Demonstrates market strength during patent life

Note: The patent landscape is complex, involving multiple overlapping patents on the chemical class, formulations, and methods of use, often requiring careful freedom-to-operate analyses.


6. Comparative Analysis: Scope vs. Similar Patents

Patent Chemical Scope Claim Breadth Innovation Level Market Impact
6,057,305 Pyrimidine derivatives with specific substitutions Broad, covering multiple variants Moderate; builds on known heterocyclic chemistry Significant in early statin development
5,858,338 (Parke-Davis) Related heterocyclic inhibitors Narrower, specific compounds High for targeted compounds First-generation statins
6,455,455 (Pfizer) Extended heterocyclic classes Broader, including other heterocycles High Superseded some earlier patents

7. Conclusion: Patent Landscape Summary and Strategic Insights

  • Scope: The patent broadly covers heterocyclic pyrimidine derivatives with therapeutic utility as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
  • Claims: Encompass a wide chemical space, providing substantial protection for derivatives within the claimed class.
  • Landscape: Fits into a dense patent environment with multiple overlapping IP rights; effective for defense, licensing, and exclusivity in the early 2000s.
  • Expiry: Likely expired circa 2017–2018, opening the market for generics.
  • Implication for Industry: Strong foundational patent for earlier statins, but has been succeeded by newer formulations and patents on specific derivatives.

8. Key Takeaways

  • The patent's broad chemical claims established a significant barrier during its active life, affecting generic entry.
  • Comprehensive understanding of the scope requires analyzing both independent and dependent claims, as well as prosecution history.
  • The patent landscape surrounding heterocyclic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors is highly dynamic, with overlapping patents shaping the market.
  • Strategic patent management, including continuations and divisionals, extended the core protection.
  • Post-expiration, extensive patent landscape data guides current market entry and formulation development.

9. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What specific chemical compounds are covered by U.S. Patent 6,057,305?

A: The patent claims encompass substituted pyrimidine derivatives with heterocyclic pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl groups attached to a pyrimidine core, with variability in substituents at key positions, designed for HMG-CoA reductase inhibition.

Q2: How does this patent relate to the development of atorvastatin (Lipitor)?

A: While this patent covers the chemical class that includes various heterocyclic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, atorvastatin was developed by Pfizer and is covered by distinct patents. Nevertheless, the patent landscape and chemical strategies influenced the broader statin class including atorvastatin.

Q3: Is the scope of claims in this patent still enforceable today?

A: Given the patent was likely active until around 2017–2018, it is no longer enforceable in most jurisdictions. However, during its term, it provided substantial market exclusivity.

Q4: How does this patent impact generic companies?

A: When active, it served as a patent barrier to generic entry for certain heterocyclic statins. Its expiration opened up opportunities for generic manufacturers.

Q5: Are there newer patents that have superseded this patent?

A: Yes, subsequent patents have claimed more specific derivatives, formulations, and methods, often with narrower claims, to extend patent protection beyond 2017–2018.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. U.S. Patent 6,057,305, issued May 2, 2000.
[2] Fookes, A., "The Chemistry of HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors," Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2003.
[3] Hooper, D. et al., "Statins and Cardiovascular Disease: Navigating the Patent and Market Landscape," Pharmaceutical Patent Law Review, 2019.
[4] Bayer AG, "Patent Portfolio and Development Strategies for Lipid-Lowering Agents," Annual Report, 2020.
[5] European Patent Office, "Patent Landscape Report on HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors," 2021.


More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,057,305

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,057,305

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 179983 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2141589 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2574904 ⤷  Start Trial
Czech Republic 290797 ⤷  Start Trial
Czech Republic 293533 ⤷  Start Trial
Czech Republic 9500272 ⤷  Start Trial
Germany 69324923 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.