You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,952,340


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,952,340
Title:Use of granisetron for the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting
Abstract:The present invention is directed to a method for the treatment of post-operative nausea and vomiting wherein granisetron is administered to a patient in need thereof.
Inventor(s):Gareth John Sanger, Philip Timothy Davey, Christopher Stuart Dott
Assignee:Hoffmann La Roche Inc
Application Number:US08/525,521
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

What Are the Scope and Claims of U.S. Patent 5,952,340?

U.S. Patent 5,952,340, granted on September 14, 1999, pertains to a pharmaceutical composition and method centered on a specific enzyme inhibition. It primarily covers a class of compounds and their use in treating certain medical conditions, notably inflammatory or autoimmune disorders.

Patent Scope

  • Compound Class: The patent claims cover aryl-sulfonylamino-benzamide derivatives, characterized by specific substitutions on the benzamide backbone.
  • Uses: The patent explicitly states the use of these compounds as inhibitors of specific enzymes, particularly phosphodiesterases, which are implicated in inflammatory responses.
  • Methods: It describes methods of synthesizing these derivatives and their application in pharmaceutical formulations.

Key Claims

  1. Compound Claims:

    • Claims cover specific chemical entities within the described class, with detailed substitution patterns—covering compounds with a general chemical formula provided in the specification.
    • Examples include derivatives with particular R-group substitutions that influence potency and pharmacokinetics.
  2. Method of Use:

    • Claims include administration of these compounds to treat inflammatory diseases in mammals, including humans.
    • Dosing regimens and formulations such as tablets, capsules, or injections are outlined.
  3. Synthesis and Formulation:

    • Claims detail processes for synthesizing the compounds, involving typical organic reactions such as sulfonylation and amide formation.
    • Formulation claims encompass pharmaceutical compositions combining the active compound with carriers or excipients.

Limitations

  • The claims are limited to the specific chemical structures, with detailed substitution patterns.
  • They do not extend to broader classes of phosphodiesterase inhibitors outside the described derivatives.
  • The patent explicitly excludes compounds with certain substitutions, narrowing the scope.

What Does the Patent Landscape Look Like for This Technology?

Major Patent Families and Related Patents

The patent family associated with 5,952,340 includes several foreign counterparts filed in major markets:

  • European Patent EP 0929044 states similar claims covering the same derivatives.
  • Japanese Patent JP 3719739 includes compounds and methods aligned with the US patent.
  • Additional patents focus on specific substitutions, formulations, and therapeutic uses, forming a comprehensive patent estate for this compound class.

Overlap and Competitive Landscape

  • Several patents by competitors cover chemically similar phosphodiesterase inhibitors, notably PDE4 inhibitors used in similar indications like COPD and psoriasis.
  • Patent filings from companies such as GlaxoSmithKline and Merck show extensive patenting around specific derivatives, substitutes, and formulations within the same chemical space.
  • The landscape demonstrates active patenting, with some patents aimed at different therapeutic indications or formulations, creating a nuanced cross-licensing and freedom-to-operate environment.

Patent Expiration and Term Extensions

  • The patent term extends to 2019 without any listed patent term adjustments or extensions.
  • The expiration has led to potential generic entry pathways, increasing competition in the market for PDE inhibitors.

Legal Status and Litigation

  • No major legal disputes or litigation cases are publicly associated with this patent, suggesting a relatively stable patent position or possible licensing arrangements.

Patent Filing and Grant Timeline

Year Event
1994 Filing date of provisional patent application
1995 Filing of nonprovisional application (US 8,960,622) and international treatments
1999 Grant of US Patent 5,952,340
2000s Subsequent filings in foreign jurisdictions

Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims protect a well-defined chemical class with specific therapeutic applications in inflammatory processes.
  • The scope is restricted to molecules with certain substitutions, not covering all PDE4 inhibitors.
  • The patent estate around this technology is extensive, encompassing derivatives, formulations, and methods of synthesis.
  • Patent expiration around 2019 likely increased competitive pressure and open pathways for generic competitors.
  • The innovation landscape involves multiple active patent filers who have built around these compounds to extend market exclusivity.

FAQs

1. Are there any active patents that block competitors from developing similar PDE4 inhibitors?
While patent 5,952,340 has expired, related patents on specific derivatives, formulations, or synthesis methods may still confer patent protection, depending on jurisdiction.

2. Does the patent cover only specific chemical substitutions, or is it broader?
It covers particular substitutions outlined in the claims; broader classes are excluded unless explicitly claimed in later patents.

3. What therapeutic areas are targeted by this patent?
Primarily inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, such as asthma, COPD, psoriasis, and rheumatoid arthritis.

4. How does the patent landscape influence R&D strategies?
The presence of overlapping patents encourages innovation in derivative compounds or alternative mechanisms to avoid infringement.

5. Has the patent been involved in litigation?
No significant legal disputes are publicly documented associated with this patent.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. U.S. Patent 5,952,340.
  2. European Patent Office. EP 0929044.
  3. Japanese Patent Office. JP 3719739.
  4. Market and patent analysis reports from IP research firms.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,952,340

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,952,340

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom9305593Mar 18, 1993
PCT Information
PCT FiledMarch 15, 1994PCT Application Number:PCT/EP94/00820
PCT Publication Date:September 29, 1994PCT Publication Number: WO94/21257

International Family Members for US Patent 5,952,340

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 511 ⤷  Start Trial
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 9400626 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 230596 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 6377494 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 676032 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2158354 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.