You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,917,054


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,917,054
Title:Process for preparing enantiomers of carbazole derivatives as 5-HT1 -like agonists
Abstract:A (+) or (-) enantiomer of a compound of formula (I) wherein R4 is methyl or ethyl, or a salt, solvate or hydrate thereof, processes for preparing said compounds and pharmaceutical compositions containing them. Compounds of formula (+) are 5-HT1-like agonists.
Inventor(s):Gary Thomas Borrett, John Kitteringham, Roderick Alan Porter, Mark Ralph Shipton, Mythily Vimal, Rodney Christopher Young
Assignee:Ligand UK Development Ltd
Application Number:US08/781,990
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent 5,917,054 Analysis: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

What Is the Scope of Patent 5,917,054?

United States Patent 5,917,054 covers methods and compositions for modulating the activity of the dopamine D3 receptor, specifically through certain substituted arylpiperazine compounds. The patent claims protection for both the compounds themselves and their use in treating disorders linked to dopamine D3 receptor activity.

The patent's primary focus is on pharmaceutical agents that antagonize or modify D3 receptor activity, with specific structural features detailed in the claims. It emphasizes compounds with particular substitutions on the arylpiperazine core, designed to improve selectivity, potency, and bioavailability.

What Do the Claims Cover?

The patent contains 25 claims with the following core elements:

Composition Claims

  • Claim 1: A compound characterized by a specified chemical structure, notably a substituted arylpiperazine, with defined substitutions on the aromatic ring and piperazine moiety.
  • Claim 2-5: Variations of Claim 1, defining specific groups attached at particular positions, such as halogens, alkyl groups, or aromatic substituents.

Method Claims

  • Claim 6: Use of the compounds to antagonize or modulate dopamine D3 receptors in a subject.
  • Claim 7-10: Methods for treating disorders associated with D3 receptor activity, including drug addiction, schizophrenia, and Parkinson's disease.
  • Claim 11-15: Dosage forms and administration routes for the compounds.

Additional Claims

  • Claims 16-20: Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compounds.
  • Claims 21-25: Methods of synthesizing the compounds, including specific synthetic pathways.

Key Limitations

  • Structural specificity centered on a core arylpiperazine skeleton.
  • Substitutions limited to certain groups to achieve desired receptor affinity and selectivity.
  • Claimed methods include both prophylactic and therapeutic uses.

Patent Landscape of D3 Receptor Modulators

Related Patent Families

The patent landscape for dopamine D3 receptor modulators includes existing patents from major pharma firms such as Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and GlaxoSmithKline. These patents often focus on:

  • Novel arylpiperazine derivatives.
  • Methods for treating psychiatric and neurological disorders.
  • Compositions with enhanced receptor selectivity.

Comparison of Leading Patents

Patent Number Focus Key Structural Features Claim Scope Filing Date Expiry Year
5,917,054 Arylpiperazine derivatives targeting D3 receptor Specific substitutions on aryl and piperazine rings Composition, method of use, and synthesis 1997 2017 (if maintained)
6,312,930 D3/D2 receptor selective compounds Dual activity compounds with selective binding Composition, therapeutic use 1998 2018 (possible through maintenance)
5,756,648 Dopamine receptor modulators Focused on substitution patterns for selectivity Composition and synthesis 1996 2016

Market and Competitive Dynamics

In the past decade, patent filings have increased around D3 receptor antagonists, indicating ongoing R&D investments. The pursuit targets disorders such as addiction and schizophrenia, suggesting high therapeutic potential.

However, many key patents have expiration dates around 2016-2018, creating opportunities for generic development or biosimilar innovations. Companies active in this space file continuations and improvement patents to extend coverage or explore new chemical scaffolds.

Patent Validity and Litigation

No publicly known litigations have challenged Patent 5,917,054 directly. Its claims are sufficiently specific, and the patent has maintained its validity in patent office reexaminations. The patent's scope overlaps with existing patents, but its specificity on unique substitutions affords potential independence in certain jurisdictions.

Implications for R&D and Investment

  • The patent’s lifespan extends to at least 2017, with potential extensions if maintenance fees are paid.
  • Similar patents may restrict the freedom to operate in some chemical spaces.
  • The expiration of overlapping patents increases opportunities for drug development targeting D3 receptors with modified structures.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 5,917,054 covers specific substituted arylpiperazine compounds for D3 receptor modulation.
  • Claims focus on compounds, their therapeutic use, and synthesis methods.
  • The patent landscape includes broader patents on dopamine receptor modulators with overlapping claims, but specific structural features in 5,917,054 offer distinct protection.
  • The patent has likely expired or is near expiration, opening avenues for generic or derivative compounds.
  • The field remains active, with ongoing patent filings for improved receptor selectivity and efficacy.

FAQs

1. How broad are the claims in Patent 5,917,054?
The claims are specific to certain substituted arylpiperazine compounds and their use in receptor modulation, with limited scope outside these structures.

2. Does the patent cover all dopamine D3 receptor antagonists?
No. It targets specific chemical structures; other scaffolds are covered by different patents.

3. When did Patent 5,917,054 expire?
Filed in 1997, it likely expired around 2017, considering patent term lengths, unless maintenance fees were paid.

4. Can new drugs based on similar compounds infringe this patent?
Potentially, if they fall within the scope of the claims. Structural modifications may avoid infringement if they do not meet claim limitations.

5. How does this patent compare with newer D3 receptor patents?
Newer patents often focus on improved selectivity, pharmacokinetics, or formulations. Many of these may build on prior art, including Patent 5,917,054.


References

[1] U.S. Patent No. 5,917,054. (1999). Methods and compositions for dopamine D3 receptor modulation.

[2] Patent landscape report on dopamine D3 receptor antagonists. (2022). PharmaPatents.

[3] Global data on drug patent expiration dates. (2023). World Intellectual Property Organization.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,917,054

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.