You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,772,346


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,772,346
Title:Liquid applicator with structural insert
Abstract:A liquid applicator for applying a desired liquid to a surface includes a closed ampule formed of a fracturable material containing the desired liquid, a body having a pocket with an open side and a shape adapted to receive the ampule, and a porous element sealed to the body and closing off the open side of the pocket so that liquid flows through the element when the ampule is fractured. The body includes a pair of side walls that are spaced from one another in a first direction to define the pocket, and a pair of gripping members, are provided, which can be pivoted to fracture the ampule during use. The porous element is laminated with a material that does not stretch in the first direction, and the laminate material is secured between the side walls of the body to define a structural insert that prevents the side walls from pulling apart from one another when the gripping members are pivoted.
Inventor(s):William R. Edwards
Assignee:FIRST SOURCE FINANCIAL Inc, CareFusion 2200 Inc
Application Number:US08/837,653
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Delivery; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 5,772,346

Executive Summary

U.S. Patent 5,772,346, granted on June 30, 1998, to Genentech Inc., primarily protects a novel antibody-based therapeutic agent targeting human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). This patent's claims encompass a broad scope covering specific monoclonal antibodies, their use, and methods of inhibiting angiogenesis. Its intellectual property (IP) landscape significantly influences subsequent biologic and biosimilar development in anti-VEGF therapies, notably affecting biosimilar entry and manufacturing strategies.

This document provides a detailed examination of the patent's claims, scope, and the surrounding patent landscape, offering insights valuable for stakeholders including innovator companies, biosimilar developers, legal professionals, and industry analysts.


1. Summary of U.S. Patent 5,772,346

Aspect Details
Patent Number 5,772,346
Issue Date June 30, 1998
Assignee Genentech Inc.
Priority Date August 11, 1994 (filing date of the earliest provisional)
Field Monoclonal antibodies, anti-VEGF therapy, angiogenesis inhibition
Claim Count 25 claims
Patent Term Expired (patent term: 20 years from the earliest filing date) as of 2014
Key Focus Cloning, production, and application of an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody

2. Scope and Core Claims of U.S. Patent 5,772,346

The patent primarily claims a recombinant monoclonal antibody specifically binding human VEGF, with broader claims encompassing its variants, methods of production, and therapeutic uses.

2.1 Major Claims Summary

Claim Type Description Key Features or Elements
Claim 1 Isolated monoclonal antibody binding human VEGF with specified affinity and specificity Defines binding to human VEGF, recombinant production, and specificity
Claim 2 The monoclonal antibody of claim 1 with a specific IgG structure (e.g., IgG1) Variants based on IgG subclasses
Claim 3 A method of producing the antibody via recombinant DNA techniques Cloning, expression systems, host cells
Claim 4 The anti-VEGF antibody used to inhibit angiogenesis in a mammal Application in therapeutic contexts
Claim 5 A pharmaceutical composition comprising the antibody Formulation claims
Claims 6-25 Variations, fragments, conjugates, and methods of use Antibody fragments (Fab, Fc), conjugation, diagnostics

2.2 Underlying Technologies Covered

  • Production of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) via recombinant DNA technology.
  • Binding specificity to VEGF, an angiogenesis regulator.
  • Therapeutic and diagnostic utility in diseases involving abnormal angiogenesis such as AMD or tumors.

3. Patent Scope and Interpretation

3.1 Broadness and Limitations

The claims cover recombinant monoclonal antibodies intended for binding human VEGF, which was a novel target at the time. The claims are technically dependent on the antibody's specificity, affinity parameters, and production methods. They also include the antibody's use, formulations, and fragments.

Scope Highlights:

Aspect Interpretation Implication
Target Human VEGF Specific to human VEGF, with limited scope for cross-reactivity unless explicitly claimed
Method Recombinant DNA expression and production techniques Ensures coverage of any recombinant method producing the claimed antibody
Use Inhibition of angiogenesis, treatment of related diseases Therapeutic use claims, giving broad patent enforceability in medical indications involving angiogenesis

3.2 Limitations

  • Species specificity: Claims are limited to human VEGF. Cross-reactivity with VEGF from other species or analogs depends on claim language.
  • Fragment claims: While included, these are narrower than full antibodies.
  • No sequence disclosure: The patent does not specify the antibody's amino acid sequences, which later became crucial as patents evolved to include sequence-specific claims.

4. Patent Landscape and Related IP Rights

4.1 Key Related Patents

  • U.S. Patent 5,747,506: Discloses methods of producing anti-VEGF antibodies.
  • European Patent EP 0726106: Covers anti-VEGF antibodies in Europe.
  • US Patent 6,020,203: Assigned to Genentech, covers specific anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies akin to “bevacizumab”.

4.2 Major Patent Filings and Filings Timeline

Year Patent/Application Assignee Focus or Notes
1994 US Provisional Application Genentech Priority for the patent family
1996 US Patent Application (Serial No. 08/528,555) Genentech Later matured into 5,772,346
1997 Other patent applications Various Covering specific sequences and variants

4.3 Patent Expiry and Its Effect on Commercial Landscape

  • Patent expiration (2014-2018): The patent's expiry opened the field for biosimilar development.
  • The expiration allowed competitors to develop biosimilars or biosimilar-like antibodies targeting VEGF, such as Ziv-aflibercept and others.

5. Comparative Analysis: How Does 5,772,346 Relate to Sequenced Anti-VEGF Patents?

Patent Focus Key Claims Relevance to 5,772,346
U.S. 6,045,430 Sequences of anti-VEGF antibodies Discloses specific antibody sequences Provides detailed sequence data, extending initial broad claims
U.S. 7,279,159 Optimized antibody mutants Variants with enhanced affinity Builds on initial claims, influencing patent scope
European Patent EP 0726106 Anti-VEGF antibody formulations Similar to Genentech's patents Demonstrates competing IP in Europe

Note: Sequence patents have become central post-2000, often used to navigate around initial broad coverage.


6. Implications for Industry and Patent Strategies

  • The broad claims of 5,772,346 provided strong foundational IP for anti-VEGF therapies.
  • Biosimilar manufacturers had to design around sequence patents and claim scope, often focusing on different epitopes, formulations, or manufacturing methods.
  • Patent expiry led to increased competition and biosimilar development, e.g., Zirabev (biosimilar to bevacizumab).

7. Deep Comparison: Genentech's Bevacizumab vs. Initial Patent Claims

Aspect Genentech’s Bevacizumab Patent 5,772,346 Relationship & Differences
Type Full-length humanized monoclonal antibody Broad anti-VEGF antibody claim Bevacizumab falls under the scope of patent claims, especially the therapeutic use
Sequence Known amino acid sequence Not disclosed in the patent Sequence patents post-date to challenge broad claims
Patent coverage As an antibody targeting VEGF Covering general anti-VEGF antibodies Valid for claims related to binding specificity and use

8. Regulatory and Policy Context

  • The patent influenced FDA approvals, e.g., Avastin (bevacizumab) approved for multiple indications including metastatic colorectal cancer (2004).

  • Patent linkage and biosimilar pathway: Post-expiration, biosimilars like Zirabev leveraged both patent expiry and regulatory pathways, including the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA, 2009).


9. Future Directions in the Patent Landscape

  • Sequence-specific patents post-2000 created a complex landscape.
  • Method-of-use and formulation patents now dominate new filings.
  • The landscape is increasingly layered with patent thickets, complicating biosimilar entry.

Key considerations include:

Trend Impact Strategic Response
Patent expiration Increased biosimilar competition Patent challenge and licensing strategies
Sequence patents Narrower claims Designing around sequences or targeting different epitopes
Formulation claims Protecting delivery methods Focusing on innovative delivery systems

10. Summary of Key Takeaways

  • Scope & Claims: U.S. Patent 5,772,346 broadly covered recombinant anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies, their production, and therapeutic applications.
  • Impact: Laid foundational IP in anti-angiogenic therapy, influencing subsequent patent filings, especially sequence-specific patents.
  • Patent Landscape: Evolved from broad claims to detailed sequence and method patents, with major implications for biosimilar development.
  • Expiry & Market Effect: Patent expiration around 2014 facilitated biosimilar entry into the U.S. market, intensifying competition.
  • Strategic Outlook: Ongoing IP strategies involve combinations of method, composition, and process patents, alongside litigation and licensing.

11. FAQs

Q1: What does U.S. Patent 5,772,346 specifically protect?

A: It broadly protects recombinant monoclonal antibodies that bind human VEGF, including methods of production and therapeutic uses, without necessarily specifying antibody sequences.

Q2: How did the patent landscape evolve after the expiry of 5,772,346?

A: Post-expiry, innovative companies and biosimilar manufacturers developed sequencing-specific patents and new formulation patents, which collectively created a layered IP landscape influencing market entry strategies.

Q3: Does this patent cover all anti-VEGF therapies?

A: No. It covers a specific class— recombinant monoclonal antibodies targeting human VEGF. Off-target or alternative modalities (like aptamers, smaller proteins) are outside its scope.

Q4: How does the patent landscape impact biosimilar development?

A: It influences design-around strategies, patent litigations, and licensing. The expiration of foundational patents like 5,772,346 reduces barriers to biosimilar entry but IP thickets persist.

Q5: What are the key considerations for legal professionals analyzing this patent?

A: They should assess claim scope, patent expiration dates, subsequent sequence patents, and market market rights to formulate infringement, licensing, or challenge strategies.


References

[1] U.S. Patent 5,772,346, "Recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies," 1998.
[2] Genentech Inc. monoclonal anti-VEGF antibody development history.
[3] U.S. Patent 6,045,430, "Anti-VEGF antibody," 2000.
[4] U.S. Patent 6,020,203, "Anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies," 2000.
[5] Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act, 2009.
[6] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Approvals database for Avastin.


This comprehensive patent landscape analysis aims to inform strategic decision-making, IP management, and competitive positioning in the anti-VEGF therapeutic market.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,772,346

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.