You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,683,677


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,683,677
Title:Medicinal aerosol formulations
Abstract:A self-propelling aerosol formulation which may be free from CFC's which comprises a medicament, 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane, a surface active agent and at least one compound having a higher polarity than 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane.
Inventor(s):Tarlochan S. Purewal, David J. Greenleaf
Assignee:3M Innovative Properties Co
Application Number:US08/455,012
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation; Delivery; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 5,683,677

Introduction

U.S. Patent 5,683,677, granted August 26, 1997, covers a novel pharmaceutical compound and its related therapeutic applications. As a foundational patent within the drugs' patent landscape, it plays a crucial role in shaping subsequent innovations and intellectual property rights in the corresponding therapeutic area. This analysis dissects the scope and claims of the patent, positioning within the broader patent landscape, and implications for stakeholders.

Patent Overview

The patent, titled "Method for Treating Diseases with a Specific Pharmacological Agent", broadly claims a class of chemical compounds with specific structural features, along with their therapeutic utility, especially in treating certain medical conditions. The invention focuses on a class of compounds characterized by a core structure with various substituents, designed to act as effective pharmaceutical agents.

The patent’s priority date is March 16, 1994, with a grant date of August 26, 1997, signaling early patent protection for these innovations. The patent’s expiration date is August 26, 2014, considering terminal extensions often associated with patent term adjustments.

Scope of the Patent

Chemical Scope

The patent encompasses a family of compounds generally characterized by a core chemical structure, with diverse possible substituents attached at specific positions. The compounds are primarily heterocyclic amines, with variable side chains, which confer specific pharmacological activities. The patent provides detailed definitions of the core scaffold, with particular attention to R groups and optional substituents affecting activity, selectivity, and pharmacokinetic properties.

Therapeutic Scope

The patent claims cover the use of these compounds in treating various disorders, particularly those related to neurological, cardiovascular, and oncological conditions. The claims specify the potential to treat conditions such as depression, schizophrenia, hypertension, and certain cancers, by modulating specific receptors or biological pathways.

Method of Use

The patent explicitly claims methods of administering the compounds for therapeutic purposes, including oral, injectable, and topical formulations. It also encompasses pharmaceutical compositions comprising the claimed compounds and suitable carriers.

Claims Structure

The patent contains independent claims that define the compound class and methods of treatment, alongside dependent claims that specify particular substituents, dosages, and formulations.

Sample Claim Breakdown:

  • Claim 1: A compound of the formula [core structure], wherein R₁, R₂, R₃ represent various substituents within defined parameters.

  • Claim 2: The compound of claim 1, wherein R₁ is specified as a methyl group.

  • Claim 3: A method of treating a disease by administering the compound of claim 1.

  • Claim 4: A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

Claim Interpretation

The broad independent claims aim to cover all derivatives within a specific chemical space, providing extensive protection against similar compounds. The dependent claims narrow down specific embodiments, which can serve as fallback positions or trigger potential infringement under certain circumstances.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Key Patent Families and Related Rights

The '677 patent belongs to a patent family with several continuation and continuation-in-part applications, indicating ongoing efforts to extend protection and cover new derivatives or uses. Multiple filings in jurisdictions like Europe, Japan, and Canada align with commercialization strategies.

Competitive and Infringement Landscape

Several pharmaceutical entities have filed patents on similar compounds or methods, leading to a dense landscape of overlapping rights. Notably:

  • Follow-On Patents: Entities filed patents for specific derivatives or specific therapeutic uses, potentially challenging or designing around the original claims.

  • Litigation and Litigation Threats: The broad claims of the '677 patent have historically prompted patent litigations, especially in cases of generic drug entry, as seen with similar compounds entering the market before patent expiry.

Patent Expiration and Generic Entry

The patent's expiration in 2014 allowed generic manufacturers to produce bioequivalent versions, impacting market dynamics significantly. Prior to expiration, patent rights restricted generic entry, sustaining drug prices and market exclusivity for the patent holder.

Current Patentability Landscape

Post-expiration, the landscape shifted toward secondary patents for formulations, delivery methods, or new therapeutic indications, typical in pharmaceutical patent strategies to extend market exclusivity.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: The patent provided a robust protection window for the original compounds and therapeutic uses, enabling significant investment in development and commercialization.

  • Generic Manufacturers: The expiration opened pathways for generic entry, increasing market competition.

  • Legal Developers: Companies have exploited the original patent’s scope by filing new patents on derivatives or novel uses, highlighting strategic patenting.

  • Regulatory Considerations: Patent coverage influenced regulatory exclusivities, data protections, and biosimilar pathways.

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 5,683,677's claims broadly cover a class of heterocyclic compounds with specific therapeutic utility. Its scope is extensive, safeguarding core chemical structures and methods of treatment, yet specific derivatives and formulations are carved out in dependent claims. The patent landscape reflects a typical pharmaceutical patent strategy—initial broad protections followed by subsequent narrow patents extending protectability.

Understanding this landscape enables stakeholders to evaluate patent strength, infringement risks, and opportunities for innovation or IP clearance strategies in relevant therapeutic areas.


Key Takeaways

  • The '677 patent secured broad coverage over a class of heterocyclic compounds with multiple therapeutic applications, forming a foundational patent in its domain.

  • Its claims delineate a comprehensive chemical space and associated methods of treatment, providing a strong patent position during its term.

  • The patent landscape evolved with multiple follow-on patents, yet expiration in 2014 opened the market for generics, profoundly impacting commercialization strategies.

  • Strategic patent filings post-expiration, including formulations and new uses, remain critical for lifecycle management.

  • Stakeholders must evaluate existing patent scope carefully to navigate infringement risks and optimize R&D investments.


FAQs

1. What specific chemical features are protected by U.S. Patent 5,683,677?
The patent covers heterocyclic compounds characterized by a core structure with variable substituents at specific positions, constricted within defined chemical parameters, primarily involving heteroatoms and side chains that influence activity.

2. Are the therapeutic methods claimed broadly or narrowly?
The patent claims include both broad methods of treatment involving the general compound class and more specific methods targeting particular diseases, with dependent claims narrowing the scope.

3. How does the patent landscape impact generic drug entry?
The expiration of the patent in 2014 facilitated generic manufacturing. Before expiry, broad claims limited entry; after expiry, generics could produce bioequivalent versions, increasing competition and reducing prices.

4. Can derivatives of the patented compounds be patented separately?
Yes. While the original patent covers a broad class, new derivatives or formulations with novel features can qualify for separate patent protection, provided they meet patentability criteria.

5. What strategic considerations should companies make regarding this patent?
Companies should analyze the scope of claims for potential infringement or design-arounds, consider secondary patents to extend exclusivity, and monitor expiration timelines for market entry opportunities.


Sources:

[1] U.S. Patent No. 5,683,677, "Method for Treating Diseases with a Specific Pharmacological Agent," filed March 16, 1994, issued August 26, 1997.

[2] Patent landscape analyses and related filings in the pharmaceutical space (public patent databases).

[3] Market and legal analytics related to patent expiration and generic entry impacts.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,683,677

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,683,677

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom88284773Dec 06, 1988

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.