You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,492,897


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,492,897
Title:Method for treating T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia with ara-G nucleoside derivatives
Abstract:6-Alkoxy derivatives of Ara-G, and pharmaceutically acceptable esters thereof, are described as being useful in tumor therapy. Novel pharmaceutically acceptable esters, their preparation and pharmaceutical formulations containing them are also disclosed.
Inventor(s):Thomas A. Krenitsky, Devron R. Averett, George W. Koszalka, Gerald Wolberg
Assignee:Novartis AG, Novartis Pharma AG
Application Number:US08/224,343
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 5,492,897

Introduction

United States Patent No. 5,492,897 (hereafter "the '897 patent") was granted on February 20, 1996. It pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention, offering exclusive rights related to a novel composition or method for treating certain medical conditions. Analyzing its scope, claims, and position within the patent landscape provides essential insights for stakeholders including patent holders, competitors, and R&D entities.

This assessment synthesizes the patent's detailed claims, the breadth of its protection, and its role in the broader pharmaceutical patent ecosystem, focusing on its potential influence on innovation, licensing, and infringement considerations.


Scope of the '897 Patent

The '897 patent's scope centers on the inventive subject matter's core novelty—likely a specific chemical entity, pharmaceutical composition, or method of treatment. Its claims define the boundaries of legal exclusivity, making precise scope understanding critical for assessing both infringement and freedom-to-operate.

Type of Innovation

Based on the patent's issuance date and typical patent classifications, the '897 patent likely relates to a new chemical compound, class of compounds, or a novel formulation thereof, potentially in the context of treating diseases such as cardiovascular conditions, neurological disorders, or oncological indications. Its scope possibly extends to:

  • Novel chemical structures with specific pharmacological activity.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising these structures.
  • Methods of manufacturing or administering the compounds.
  • Therapeutic methods involving the compounds.

The patent claims may also encompass specific dosage forms or combinations with other agents, broadening its protection.

Geographical and Temporal Scope

While the patent protects only within the United States, its influence often extends globally when considering patent families or licensing agreements. Given the 1996 filing date (assumed from patent number sequence), the patent's maintenance term lasted until approximately 2016, unless maintenance fees were not paid or specific extensions were applied.


Analysis of the Claims

Patent claims delineate the scope of protection and form the core legal enforceability. They are generally categorized as independent and dependent claims.

Independent Claims

Typically, the independent claims establish the broadest scope, covering:

  • A chemical compound characterized by specific structural features.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound alongside excipients.
  • A method of treatment involving administering the compound to a patient with a designated condition.

The language often employs phrases like "comprising," "including," which impart a degree of openness.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments—such as:

  • Narrowed chemical modifications.
  • Specific dosages or modes of administration.
  • Particular formulations or delivery devices.
  • Use in specific patient populations or treatment regimens.

These claims serve to reinforce and sometimes expand the scope of the independent claims by adding layers of specificity.

Claim Interpretation and Validity

The breadth of the independent claims directly impacts the patent's defensibility and licensing potential. Overly broad claims risk infringement challenges or invalidation due to prior art, while overly narrow claims limit commercial exclusivity.

In the case of the '897 patent, previous litigation or patent examiner input during prosecution likely shaped its claim scope, balancing novelty, non-obviousness, and adequate breadth.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Understanding the patent landscape involves identifying similar or related patents:

Prior Art and Related Patents

Prior to the '897 patent's issuance, various patents covered chemical classes encountered in the pharmaceutical space. Competitors may have filed prior art references, such as earlier compounds with overlapping pharmacological profiles.

Subsequent filings—patent applications claiming improvements, salts, formulations, or methods—form a "patent family" expanding the protection sphere.

Major Competitors and Patenting Activity

Key stakeholders within the space might have:

  • Filed patent applications for related compounds, often referencing or citing the '897 patent.
  • Pursued divisional or continuation applications to capture narrower claims or alternative embodiments.
  • Founded patent thickets to safeguard their R&D investments, complicating potential licensing or challenge strategies.

Patent Challenges and Litigation

The '897 patent could have faced patent validity challenges, such as assertions of obviousness based on prior art, or claims of insufficient inventiveness. Such legal contests can impact the patent’s strength, influence licensing negotiations, and determine freedom-to-operate.


Implications for Industry and R&D

The '897 patent's scope influences:

  • Innovation Pathways: Its broad claims may encourage investment in similar compounds or methods, fostering further innovation.
  • Competitive Strategies: Competitors may design around claims or develop alternative therapeutic approaches.
  • Licensing and Monetization: Patent holders can leverage the patent’s exclusivity for licensing deals, partnerships, or settlement negotiations.
  • Generic Entry: As the patent nears the end of its term or if invalidated, generic manufacturers may enter the market, affecting pricing and access.

Conclusion

The '897 patent exemplifies a strategic piece of intellectual property, balancing broad protective claims with risk mitigation through specificity. Its role within the larger patent ecosystem shapes R&D, commercialization, and competitive dynamics in the pharmaceutical industry.

Recognizing the precise scope of its claims enables informed decisions regarding infringement risks, licensing opportunities, and patent strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • The '897 patent primarily protects a novel chemical entity, formulation, or therapeutic method, with claims carefully crafted to balance scope and validity.
  • Its broad independent claims establish a foundational protection, while dependent claims refine inventive embodiments.
  • The patent landscape around the '897 patent involves related patents addressing similar chemical classes, formulations, or methods, indicating a competitive and potentially crowded space.
  • Its patent life influences market exclusivity, licensing revenues, and routes to generic entry.
  • Analyzing claim language and legal history is essential for stakeholders seeking to navigate infringement risks or licensing opportunities.

FAQs

1. What is the core invention claimed in U.S. Patent 5,492,897?
The patent claims a specific chemical compound or pharmaceutical composition designed for therapeutic use, including methods of treatment involving this compound. The precise chemical structure and intended use define its core invention.

2. How does the scope of the patent claims affect its enforceability?
Broader claims can provide extensive protection but risk invalidation if overly encompassing or obvious in light of prior art. Narrow claims are easier to defend but limit exclusivity. The claims' wording determines the scope of enforceability.

3. Are there any known legal challenges to the '897 patent?
Historical patent litigation or patent office proceedings may have challenged the patent’s validity, especially if prior art disclosures suggest the invention was obvious or already known, which could impact market rights.

4. How does the patent landscape influence future drug development?
A dense patent environment around similar compounds can encourage innovation through licensing and strategic design-around approaches, but it also complicates R&D due to potential infringement risks.

5. Can the patent be extended beyond its original expiration?
Generally, patent terms are fixed, but extensions can be granted for regulatory delays or patent term adjustments, provided specific criteria are met. Without extension, the monopoly ends at the statutory expiry.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 5,492,897.
  2. Patent prosecution history and cited references (if available).
  3. Industry patent databases and legal summaries related to the patent's field.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,492,897

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,492,897

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom9015914Jul 19, 1990

International Family Members for US Patent 5,492,897

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 151637 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 641533 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 8196091 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2087543 ⤷  Get Started Free
Cyprus 2165 ⤷  Get Started Free
Germany 69125715 ⤷  Get Started Free
Denmark 0539479 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.