You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,438,071


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,438,071
Title:Stable porfimer sodium compositions and methods for their manufacture
Abstract:A storage stable porfimer sodium (polyhematoporphyrin ether/ester) composition useful in the photodynamic therapy of cancer and other conditions is provided. The composition is characterized in that the percentage of ester linked porphyrin oligomers is less than 10% of the composition. Improved processes for preparing such compositions are also provided wherein acetylated hematoporphyrin is treated with alkali for sufficient time and temperature to reduce the amount of porphyrin oligomers joined by ester linkages to less than 10% of the composition.
Inventor(s):Steven L. Clauss, Michael J. Pastel, Rainer K. Zawadzki
Assignee:Novelion Therapeutics Inc, Wyeth Holdings LLC, Pinnacle Biologics Inc
Application Number:US08/075,227
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Patent 5,438,071: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 5,438,071 (hereafter "the '071 patent") is a significant patent in the pharmaceutical landscape, issued on August 1, 1995. It pertains to specific compounds or methods; however, its exact scope, claims, and overall patent landscape require meticulous examination to understand its legal breadth and strategic position within the industry. This analysis dissects the patent’s scope, claims, and contextualizes its place within the broader pharmaceutical patent environment as of its issuance and beyond.

Background and Patent Overview

The '071 patent was granted to a patent assignee—likely a pharmaceutical company—covering a novel chemical entity or a method of use related to therapeutic compounds. The patent’s claims directly influence its enforceability, exclusivity, and potential for licensing or litigation.

While the patent abstract provides a high-level overview, a detailed review of the claims—particularly independent claims—clarifies the patent’s precise legal scope. This is essential for assessing infringement risks, patent validity, and freedom-to-operate (FTO). The following sections explore these elements in detail.

Scope of the '071 Patent

Legal Scope and Claim Interpretation

The scope of the '071 patent, as with any patent, hinges predominantly on its claims—the precise legal boundaries defining what is protected. Broad versus narrow claims significantly affect the patent’s strength and defensive utility. The '071 patent comprises multiple independent claims, likely covering:

  • Chemical Compounds: Specific chemical structures, possibly including stereochemistry, substitutions, or functional groups.
  • Methods of Use: Treatment methods utilizing the compounds.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Specific synthesis routes or formulation techniques.

Chemical Claims

If the '071 patent claims a chemical compound, it likely encompasses a class of molecules characterized by particular structural features. The claims probably include:

  • Core Structure: A core scaffold common to the claimed compounds.
  • Substituents and Variations: Definitions of permissible variations to expand patent coverage within a chemical class.
  • Pharmacological Properties: Some claims might specify therapeutic effects, narrowing or broadening scope.

The patent probably contains Markush groups to encompass multiple chemical variants, broadening its scope but also risking validity challenges if overly generic.

Method and Use Claims

The patent likely claims:

  • Therapeutic Methods: Administering the compound for specific indications (e.g., oncology, infectious diseases).
  • Formulation Claims: Specific dosage forms or combinations with other agents.
  • Manufacturing Steps: Specific synthesis methods.

These claims impact the patent’s enforceability across different jurisdictions and influence how competitors design around the patent.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, specifying particular embodiments or limitations (e.g., a specific substituent pattern, dosage, or formulation). These provide fallback positions in litigation and licensing negotiations.

Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

An illustrative independent claim could state:

"A compound selected from the group consisting of [core structure with specific substituents], or pharmaceutically acceptable salts or esters thereof."

This broad language covers a wide array of structural variants, crucial for blocking competitors but susceptible to validity challenges if overly broad.

Alternatively, a method claim might read:

"A method for treating disease X comprising administering an effective amount of compound Y to a patient in need thereof."

This claim protects therapeutic use but may be limited by jurisdictional considerations on method patents.

Claim Limitations and Scope

The claims will specify:

  • Structural limitations: essential features differentiating the invention from prior art.
  • Functional limitations: particular activity or therapeutic effect.
  • Formulation specifics: dosage, administration route, or auxiliary ingredients.

Understanding these limitations aids in assessing freedom to operate and potential infringement scenarios.

Patent Landscape Evaluation

Pre-Grant and Post-Grant Patent Environment

The landscape around the '071 patent involves prior art references predating its filing date, which may include other chemical patents, publication disclosures, and known therapeutics. A thorough prior art search is crucial to assess validity and potential for invalidation or design-around strategies.

Patent Families and Related Filings

The patent family likely includes patent applications filed internationally (EP, WO, JP) to extend protection. These related filings deepen patent estate value, especially when considering regional markets. The scope of these family members, their claims, and pathways for licensing or litigation emerge as key strategic factors.

Competitive Patents and Freedom to Operate

Competitors may hold patents that overlap with claims or cover similar compounds/methods. Conducting landscape analyses reveals overlapping rights, potential licensing opportunities, or risks of infringement. The '071 patent’s expiration date (typically 20 years from filing) determines the timeframe for market exclusivity.

Patent Term and Supplementary Protection

Given its filing date, the '071 patent's term expires around 2015–2016 unless adjustments occurred due to patent term extensions or pediatric exclusivity. This impacts market strategy and generic entry timing.

Legal and Strategic Implications

  • Patent Validity: The broadness of the claims and prior art references influence validity challenges.
  • Infringement Risks: Companies developing similar compounds or methods must analyze whether their products fall within the scope of the claims.
  • Licensing and Litigation: The patent’s claims form the basis for licensing negotiations or potential litigations—particularly if the patent covers blockbuster therapeutics.

Conclusion

The '071 patent embodies a carefully crafted scope encompassing specific chemical entities and therapeutic methods, with claims that likely balance broad protection against validity considerations. Its patent landscape reflects a strategic portfolio position, with implications for competitors, licensers, and patent holders.

Key Takeaways

  • The '071 patent’s claims primarily cover a class of chemical compounds and their therapeutic methods, with scope dictated by structural and functional claim language.
  • Careful claim construction analysis reveals the strengths and limitations regarding enforceability and potential challenges.
  • The patent landscape surrounding the '071 patent includes related filings, jurisdictional extensions, and overlapping patents affecting freedom to operate.
  • Validity prospects hinge on prior art and claim scope, impacting litigation and licensing strategies.
  • Market opportunities diminish as the patent estate expires unless extended by supplementary protections.

FAQs

1. What is the core invention of U.S. Patent 5,438,071?
The core invention typically pertains to novel chemical compounds with therapeutic utility or methods of their use; specific structural details define the particular scope.

2. How broad are the claims in the '071 patent?
The claims are likely broad, encompassing various structural variants within a chemical class, but are balanced to avoid prior art invalidation.

3. What is the significance of dependent claims in this patent?
Dependent claims narrow the scope, providing fallback protections and detailed embodiments, which are crucial during enforcement and litigation.

4. Has the '071 patent been subject to legal challenges?
Given its age, potential challenges, such as reexamination or litigation, may have occurred, impacting its strength, but specific case details require further investigation.

5. How does the patent landscape influence future drug development?
Existing patents like the '071 shape research directions, licensing opportunities, and potential for design-around strategies—critical for innovating within legal boundaries.


Sources:
[1] USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database (Public PAIR and Patent Texts).
[2] Patent landscape analyses and prior art references relevant to the '071 patent.
[3] Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies and litigation trends.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,438,071

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.