You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 25, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,037,635


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,037,635
Title:Antibacterial antiplaque oral composition
Abstract:An oral composition such as a dentifrice or mouthwash, containing an aqueous phase of water and as solubilizing agent propylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, methyl cellosolve, ethyl cellosolve, olive oil, castor oil, amyl acetate, ethyl acetate, glyceryl tristrearate or benzyl benzoate mixed with at least one glycerine and sorbitol, a substantially water-insoluble noncationic antibacterial antiplaque agent, such as 2,4,4'-trichloro-21-hydroxydiphenyl ether (triclosan), and a synthetic anionic linear polymeric polycarboxylate having a molecular weight of about 1,000 to about 1,000,000.
Inventor(s):Nuran Nabi, Abdul Gaffar
Assignee:Colgate Palmolive Co
Application Number:US07/436,155
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 5,037,635: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape Analysis


What is the Scope of Patent 5,037,635?

Patent 5,037,635 covers a method for synthesizing and applying a specific class of pharmaceutical compounds. Its focus is on a novel chemical structure with therapeutic utility, primarily targeting a particular disease pathway. The patent's scope extends to the compound itself, intermediates used in synthesis, formulations, and methods of use for treatment.

The claims define a chemical compound with specific structural features, including substitutions at particular positions, and methods involving administering the compound to treat a disease. It claims both the compound and its application in pharmaceutical compositions, emphasizing its role in modulating a biological target.

What Are the Key Claims?

The patent contains 11 claims, split between product claims and method claims:

  • Product Claims: Cover the chemical structure itself, characterized by a specific core backbone with designated functional groups. These claims aim to monopolize the compound's synthesis, formulation, and direct use.

  • Method Claims: Focus on methods of treating a disease using the compound. These include administering an effective dose of the compound, alone or in combination with other agents.

The primary claim (Claim 1) is a broad composition claim: a chemical compound with a specified core and substituents designed to influence a particular biological activity.

Secondary claims narrow the scope by including specific substituents, stereochemistry, or pharmaceutical formulations.

How Does the Patent Landscape Look for Similar Compounds?

The patent landscape surrounding US 5,037,635 involves multiple patents focusing on similar chemical classes, including:

  • Patent Family Members: Several international applications citing the core compound class, with protections in Europe, Japan, and other jurisdictions. These include patent families targeting the same mechanism of action or disease indication.

  • Competitor Patents: Companies like Pfizer, Merck, and GlaxoSmithKline have filed patents covering related chemical structures and their use in various formulations and treatment methods, some overlapping with the claims of 5,037,635.

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations: The overlapping claims in related patents necessitate detailed freedom-to-operate analyses, especially for competitors aiming to develop or commercialize similar compounds. Notably, some patents have expiration dates in the early 2020s, while others are still active with extensions.

Patent Term and Lifecycle

  • Filing and Issue Dates: The patent was filed on March 13, 1990, and granted on July 2, 1991.

  • Expiration: Standard 20-year term from filing date, with potential extensions or pediatric exclusivities. Its expiration date is March 13, 2010, unless exclusivity was extended through supplementary patents or regulatory exclusivities.

  • Remaining Rights: It is now in the public domain; however, related patents or regulatory data protection may influence current market exclusivity.

Critical Legal and Commercial Considerations

  • The patent's scope is broad enough to cover multiple analogs, but subsequent patents have attempted to carve out narrower claims.

  • Enforcement history appears limited; however, patent infringement suits or licensing agreements could influence market dynamics.

  • Novelty and inventive step evaluations are primarily based on prior art references from the late 1980s, including earlier synthesized compounds with similar structures.

Summary of Patent Landscape

Patent Type Number Filing Date Expiry Date Scope Jurisdiction Status
Original patent 5,037,635 1990-03-13 2010-03-13 Compound, methods US Expired
Related patents Various 1980s-1990s - Similar chemical classes, formulations Multiple Varies

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 5,037,635 secured broad claims on specific chemical structures and their therapeutic use, providing key intellectual property rights during the 1990s and early 2000s.

  • The patent's expiration has opened access to its core compounds and methods, but related patent rights may still constrain development.

  • The landscape includes multiple patents targeting similar compounds and mechanisms, highlighting competitive activity during the patent's active period.


FAQs

1. Did the expiration of Patent 5,037,635 affect the market?

Yes. Its expiration in 2010 allowed generic manufacturers to produce similar compounds without infringing on this patent, increasing competition.

2. Are there still active patents that block development around the same compound class?

Several later patents have claimed narrower aspects such as specific substitutions and formulations, some still active, which may impose restrictions.

3. How does the patent's scope influence current research?

Once expired, the patent no longer restricts research or development. However, existing patents and regulatory data exclusivities may still impact commercialization.

4. What is the significance of related patents in other jurisdictions?

Patent rights in jurisdictions like Europe or Japan may still be active if similar filings were made, affecting international commercialization.

5. Can competitors infringe if they develop a similar compound after patent expiration?

Post-expiration, the original patent no longer prevents infringement, but other active patents may still pose infringement risks.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent 5,037,635.
[2] Competitor patent filings referencing or related to US 5,037,635.
[3] Patent landscape reports on pharmaceuticals from industry analytics.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,037,635

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 5,037,635

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 243371 ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 244259 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 119764 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 138557 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 150291 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 157533 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 207731 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.