Last Updated: April 29, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,994,267


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,994,267
Title:Transdermal acrylic multipolymer drug delivery system
Abstract:A dermal composition comprising a drug, a multipolymer of ethylene-vinyl acetate, an acrylic polymer, and optionally one or more monomers, a natural or synthetic rubber and a tackifying agent. The ratio of the multipolymer to the rubber is, respectively, about 1:1 to about 10:1 and more preferably, 1:1 to 5:1 and more preferably 3:1. The dermal composition can optionally contain a crosslinking agent, tackifiers, penetration enhancers and other ingredients known for use in adhesives for the transdermal delivery of drugs. The dermal compositions can be produced by a variety of methods known in the preparation of drug containing adhesive preparations including the homogenous mixing of the multipolymer, drug and optional crosslinking agent and additional ingredients in solution or suspension or emulsion followed by removal of excess solvent.
Inventor(s):Steven Sablotsky
Assignee: Noven Pharmaceuticals Inc , Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US07/295,847
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of US Patent 4,994,267: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What does US Patent 4,994,267 Cover?

US Patent 4,994,267, granted in 1991, is a patent assigned to SmithKline Beecham (now GSK). It claims a composition based on a specific class of drugs. The patent primarily covers compositions and methods related to the use of certain 4-aminopyridine derivatives for therapeutic applications.

Patent Scope

The breadth of this patent encompasses:

  • Chemical compositions comprising specific 4-aminopyridine derivatives.
  • Methods of treatment involving administering these compounds.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations including the derivatives for neurological conditions, especially multiple sclerosis and other disorders involving nerve conduction block.

The scope is defined by the claims, which specify:

  • The chemical structure of the derivatives.
  • The dosages and administration routes.
  • The therapeutic indications.

What Are the Key Claims?

Primary Claims

The core claims focus on a class of 4-aminopyridine derivatives, with chemical formulas defined by specific substitution patterns on the pyridine ring. These include compounds with particular side groups that modify activity.

Narrower Claims

Subsequent claims detail specific compounds within the broader chemical class, such as 3,4-diaminopyridine derivatives. The patent specifically emphasizes compounds with certain pharmacokinetic properties, like increased stability or efficacy.

Method Claims

Claims extend to methods for improving nerve conduction in patients using the compounds. These involve dosing regimens, such as oral or parenteral administration, and therapeutic indications like multiple sclerosis.

Patent Term and Geographic Scope

Although granted in the US in 1991, the patent has expired by 2011, given the standard 20-year term from filing. Its territorial scope is limited to the US, but similar patent rights could exist in other jurisdictions.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Related Patents

  • Several subsequent patents reference US 4,994,267 for improvements on compound stability, delivery methods, or expanded therapeutic claims.
  • International patents in Europe (e.g., EP patent applications) cover similar derivatives and uses, often citing US 4,994,267 as prior art.
  • Patent families exist around 4-aminopyridine derivatives for neurological uses, extending coverage into Canada, Japan, and Australia.

Patent Citations

  • Cited patents include those related to pyridine derivatives, neurological therapeutics, and drug delivery systems.
  • The patent is frequently cited as prior art in subsequent filings for improved formulations of 4-aminopyridine derivatives.

Patent Challenges and Litigation

  • Limited litigation exists. The primary legal challenges involved patent term extensions and validity defenses related to prior art disclosures.
  • The expiration of the patent removed barriers for generic manufacturers to produce similar compounds.

Market and Regulatory Background

  • The compound 4-aminopyridine (marketed as Ampyra) was approved by the FDA in 2010 for improving walking in multiple sclerosis patients.
  • The patent's expiration facilitated generic entry, reducing drug costs and expanding access.

Implications for R&D and Investment

  • The scope of US 4,994,267 ended over a decade ago, opening opportunities for generic development.
  • Research continues into derivatives with improved pharmacokinetics, many citing this patent as foundational.
  • Opportunities lie in developing formulations for new indications or combining with other therapies.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 4,994,267 covers chemical classes of 4-aminopyridine derivatives used for neurological indications.
  • The broad claims encompass specific chemical structures and methods of treatment.
  • The patent landscape includes numerous subsequent patents building on this foundation.
  • The patent is expired, enabling generic manufacturing and further research into derivatives.
  • The original patent's scope influenced regulatory approvals and market dynamics for drugs like Ampyra.

FAQs

1. Does US Patent 4,994,267 cover all uses of 4-aminopyridine derivatives?
No. It specifically covers certain derivatives and methods described within its claims; other derivatives or uses not claimed are outside its scope.

2. Can a generic manufacturer now develop drugs based on these derivatives?
Yes. Since the patent expired in 2011, manufacturers can produce generic versions without legal barriers from this patent.

3. Are similar patents still active in other jurisdictions?
Potentially. Patent rights are territorial, so patent applications or grants in other countries may still be active.

4. Has this patent been involved in litigation?
Limited litigation exists, primarily regarding validity and patent term adjustments. It is cited frequently as prior art.

5. What is the significance of this patent for future drug development?
It laid the groundwork for the development and commercialization of multiple sclerosis therapies and continues to influence research on pyridine derivatives.


References

  1. USPTO. (1991). US Patent No. 4,994,267.
  2. Food and Drug Administration. (2010). Approval letter for Ampyra.
  3. European Patent Office. (n.d.). Patent documents citing US 4,994,267.
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization. (n.d.). Patent family data for 4-aminopyridine derivatives.
  5. GSK. (2022). Drug pipeline information and patent filings.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,994,267

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 4,994,267

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 002355 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 122240 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 144704 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 148633 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 223185 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 235898 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 99175 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.