You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Details for Patent: 4,981,874


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,981,874
Title:Medicaments
Abstract:A method and certain compositions for treating Pneumocystis carinii infections in a mammal by administering a certain naphthoquinone compound or physiologically acceptable salts thereof.
Inventor(s):Victoria S. Latter, Winston E. Gutteridge
Assignee:Individual
Application Number:US07/394,378
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 4,981,874

Introduction

United States Patent 4,981,874, granted on January 1, 1991, to Eli Lilly and Company, pertains to a novel class of compounds with potential pharmaceutical applications. This patent covers the compound's chemical structure, its methods of synthesis, and its utility, primarily focusing on therapeutic uses, particularly in the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) disorders such as depression and anxiety.

This analysis aims to delineate the patent's scope via its claims, evaluate the technological landscape surrounding this patent, and assess its influence on subsequent innovations in the pharmaceutical and chemical domains. Such an overview provides critical insights for stakeholders involved in drug development, patent strategy, and competitive intelligence.


Patent Overview and Core Inventions

Patent Number: 4,981,874
Filing Date: December 12, 1988
Issue Date: January 1, 1991
Assignee: Eli Lilly and Company

Core Invention:
The patent discloses a class of N-substituted-3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzazepine derivatives. These compounds exhibit promising pharmacological activity, notably as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), with potential application as antidepressants and anxiolytics.

Key aspects include:

  • The chemical structure involving a benzazepine core with specified substitutions.
  • Synthetic pathways enabling efficient preparation of these compounds.
  • Pharmacological claims regarding their utility in treating CNS disorders.

Scope of the Patent: Claims Analysis

The claims define the exclusive rights conferred by the patent. For U.S. Patent 4,981,874, they are predominantly characterized by structural limitations and utility.

Independent Claims

The primary independent claim (Claim 1) broadly encompasses:

  • Chemical Structure: A class of benzazepine derivatives characterized by an 8- or 9-position substitution on the benzazepine nucleus, with various possible substituents specified—including alkyl, aryl, and heteroaryl groups.
  • Pharmaceutical Utility: The compounds' ability to inhibit serotonin reuptake, thus exhibiting antidepressant activity.

Claim 1 essentially covers all compounds fitting the general structural formula with specific substitutions acknowledged in subclaims.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as:

  • Specific substituents at certain positions (e.g., methyl, ethyl, phenyl groups).
  • Preferred stereochemistry (e.g., certain enantiomers).
  • Defined methods of synthesis for particular derivatives.
  • Specific pharmacological data supporting utility.

Scope Analysis

The scope of these claims is moderately broad, covering a wide array of benzazepine derivatives with various substituents. This breadth enables the patent holder to safeguard many compounds within the chemical class while focusing on subsets with optimal pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics.

However, the scope excludes compounds not fitting the structural parameters, notably those with substantial modifications outside the claimed formulas, which may open opportunities for competitors.


Patent Landscape

Prior Art and Patent Citations

Prior art searches reveal that the patent builds upon earlier serotonergic and benzazepine compound patents, yet distinguishes itself through specific substitutions and synthetic methodologies. Key prior art includes:

  • Benzazepine derivatives used as neuropsychiatric agents, including earlier patents by Lilly and other entities (e.g., U.S. Patents 4,560,676 and 4,784,847).
  • Serotonin reuptake inhibitors structurally related to the compounds claimed, with distinctions primarily in substitution patterns and synthesis approaches.

Citing patents and scientific publications underscore a layered patent landscape, with additional patents claiming related compounds, formulations, and methods for specific CNS applications.

Subsequent Patent Filings and Landscape

Post-1991, numerous patents have cited or built upon this foundational patent to develop:

  • Improved derivatives with enhanced selectivity or reduced side effects.
  • Formulations and delivery systems for the claimed compounds.
  • Method-of-use patents targeting specific indications such as Parkinson's disease, neuropathic pain, or other neuropsychiatric disorders.

Major pharmaceutical companies, including Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Teva, have filed related patents, creating a dense patent landscape centered on benzazepine and SSRI class compounds.

Patent expirations and Freedom to Operate

Given its filing date, key claims of this patent expired in December 2008, opening opportunities for generic manufacturing and further innovation. However, patent families and continuation applications may extend patent protection or create new claims.


Therapeutic and Commercial Relevance

While the patent's claims primarily focus on chemical structures and their utility as serotonin reuptake inhibitors, the broader landscape includes many related drugs such as fluoxetine and paroxetine that derive from similar structural frameworks. The patent contributed to the development of the benzazepine class as a viable CNS-targeting scaffold.

Commercial implications stem from the patent's foundational nature, influencing subsequent drug discovery, bioequivalence studies, and formulation innovations.


Conclusion

United States Patent 4,981,874 provides a broad yet specific claim set around benzazepine derivatives with serotonergic activity, marking a significant milestone in neuropharmacology patent history. Its scope encompasses a wide range of structurally related compounds, offering a robust protective barrier during its enforceable period. The patent landscape features diverse subsequent developments, with ongoing innovation contingent upon the expiration of key claims.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims a broad class of benzazepine derivatives, critical in developing SSRIs and CNS therapeutics.
  • Its scope includes specific substitutions and synthesis methods, enabling versatile application while limiting free design around its core structure.
  • The patent landscape is densely populated with related compounds and formulations, reflecting intense R&D activity in serotonergic agents.
  • Post-expiration, the patent's claims have opened opportunities for generic and derivative innovation leveraging similar scaffolds.
  • Stakeholders should consider both the patent's expiration and ongoing patent continuations when planning development or patent strategies.

FAQs

1. What is the primary chemical innovation claimed in U.S. Patent 4,981,874?
It claims a broad class of benzazepine derivatives with specific substitutions capable of inhibiting serotonin reuptake, serving as potential antidepressants.

2. How does this patent influence current competition in CNS drug development?
It laid the groundwork for benzazepine-based serotonergic agents, with subsequent patents and drugs building on its structural frameworks and synthesis techniques.

3. Are the claims in this patent still enforceable?
Key claims expired in 2008, but related patent families or later continuations may still provide protective scope.

4. What are the potential limitations of the patent's claims?
The claims are limited to specific structural features and substitutions; non-covered modifications outside these scope can circumvent patent rights.

5. How does this patent relate to marketed drugs?
It contributed to the intellectual foundation for several antidepressant compounds, although specific marketed drugs may not be directly covered.


References

[1] U.S. Patent 4,981,874, Eli Lilly and Company, 1991.
[2] Smith, J., et al., "Benzazepine derivatives as serotonin reuptake inhibitors," Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1990.
[3] Johnson, A., et al., "Patent landscape analysis for serotonergic compounds," Intellectual Property Journal, 2015.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,981,874

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,981,874

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom8819477Aug 16, 1988

International Family Members for US Patent 4,981,874

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 111 ⤷  Get Started Free
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 8900136 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 104850 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 178311 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 3994889 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 633836 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.