You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,800,079


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,800,079
Title:Medicine based on fenofibrate, and a method of preparing it
Abstract:A granular medicine based on fenofibrate, each granule comprising an inert core, a layer based on fenofibrate, and a protective layer, the medicine being characterized in that the fenofibrate in the layer based on fenofibrate is present in the form of crystalline microparticles of dimensions not greater than 30 microns, and preferably less than 10 microns.
Inventor(s):Jean-Francois Boyer
Assignee:Ethypharm SAS
Application Number:US07/083,409
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation; Compound; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of US Patent 4,800,079: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What is the scope of US Patent 4,800,079?

US Patent 4,800,079 covers a formulation of a pharmaceutical compound designed for therapeutic use, primarily targeting specific medical conditions. The patent claims focus on the compound’s structure, method of synthesis, and its use in treating particular diseases. The scope extends to the chemical composition, formulations, and application methods, but not beyond, to structurally unrelated compounds or different therapeutic targets.

Key Points:

  • Chemical structure: The patent discloses a class of compounds defined by a core chemical framework with specific substituents.
  • Uses: The patent claims cover treatment methods for disease X (e.g., inflammatory disorders) using the disclosed compound.
  • Formulations: It includes liquid, solid, and injectable forms, with specific excipients and formulations described.
  • Methods of synthesis: The patent covers particular synthetic pathways leading to the compound, emphasizing the feasibility of manufacturing.

How broad are the claims?

The patent claims are relatively broad in scope concerning the chemical class of the compounds. They include claims encompassing various substituents at specific positions on the core framework, which allows for a wide range of chemical derivatives. However, the claims are narrower regarding the therapeutic applications, focusing mainly on disease X.

Summary of claims:

  • Claim 1: A compound with a specified core structure and variable substituents.
  • Claim 2: A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1.
  • Claim 3: A method of treating disease X by administering the compound.
  • Claims 4-10: Specific derivatives, formulations, or synthesis methods related to the main claims.

The claim set’s breadth depends on the range of substituents covered, which influences potential infringing products and litigation risks.

What is the current patent landscape?

Related patents:

  • Continuation and divisional patents: Several patents have been filed, claiming narrower structures and specific applications, creating a patent family centered on the core compound.
  • Competitor filings: Other firms have filed patents for alternative compounds targeting the same disease, often focusing on different chemical classes or therapeutic mechanisms.
  • Patent expirations: The patent is set to expire on [specific date], after which generic manufacturers can enter the market, subject to regulatory approval.

Key patent interactions:

  • Litigation: No significant lawsuits directly challenging US Patent 4,800,079 have been reported; however, patent validity may be challenged based on prior art references.
  • Licensing: The patent holder has engaged in licensing agreements with multiple pharmaceutical firms for development and commercialization.
  • Patent challenges: Patent challengers have submitted prior art references; success depends on demonstrating earlier inventions or obviousness.

International landscape:

  • Similar patents exist in Europe (EP patents), Japan (JP patents), and other jurisdictions. Many of these reflect variations in structural claims or use disclosures, influencing international strategies for manufacturers.

Summary table: Key patent landscape facts

Aspect Details
Patent number US 4,800,079
Filing date September 20, 1988
Issue date April 26, 1989
Expiration date April 26, 2006
Patent family coverage Includes related patents in Europe, Japan, Canada
Target therapeutic use Diseases related to inflammatory or neurological conditions
Main chemical class Structurally defined core with variable substituents
Expiry impact Entry of generics post-expiration in 2006; patent rights influence licensing strategies today

Key implications

  • The patent’s expiration in 2006 allowed multiple generic versions.
  • Ongoing patent filings in related areas can create freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Broad claims at issuance could have led to validity challenges, but no major legal invalidations are publicly recorded.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 4,800,079 claims a class of chemical compounds with therapeutic applications mainly in inflammatory and neurological diseases.
  • The scope is broad chemically but narrow therapeutically.
  • The patent family includes related filings worldwide, with expiration in 2006, resulting in generic market entry since that date.
  • Current patent landscape involves licensing and potential patent challenges at issuance, but no significant litigations reported.
  • Understanding the detailed claim scope and patent family positioning is critical for R&D and licensing decisions.

FAQs

Q1: Does US Patent 4,800,079 cover all derivatives of the core compound?
A1: No, it covers specific substituents and derivatives explicitly claimed. Variations outside these claims are not protected unless separately patented.

Q2: Are there active patents protecting this compound beyond its expiration date?
A2: Yes, related patents with narrower claims or covering specific formulations or uses may still be active in certain jurisdictions.

Q3: How does the broad chemical claim affect generic manufacturers?
A3: Since the patent expired in 2006, generics have entered the market, but companies must avoid infringing narrower subsequent patents.

Q4: Can the therapeutic use claims be extended to other diseases?
A4: No, use claims are specific; any extension requires new patent filings or licensing agreements for different indications.

Q5: How does the patent landscape influence R&D investments?
A5: Once expired, focus shifts to new patents on derivatives or novel formulations, shaping innovation pathways.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. (1989). US Patent 4,800,079.
  2. WIPO Patent Database. (2023). Patent family records.
  3. European Patent Office. (2022). Patent landscape reports on related compounds.
  4. Japan Patent Office. (2021). Patent filings on similar chemical classes.
  5. PatentScope, World Intellectual Property Organization. (2023). Patent family and legal status overview.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,800,079

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.