You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Details for Patent: 4,778,054


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,778,054
Title:Pack for administering medicaments to patients
Abstract:A pack is provided comprising a circular carrier disc provided with a plurality of containers arranged in a circle and each containing a dose of medicament in particulate form. The containers are puncturable to permit the medicament therein to be released.
Inventor(s):Robert E. Newell, Robert A. Fitzsimmons
Assignee:Glaxo Group Ltd
Application Number:US06/936,148
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 4,778,054

Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 4,778,054 (the '054 patent), issued on October 18, 1988, represents a significant patent in the pharmaceutical landscape. It addresses a novel compound or formulation, providing proprietary rights that potentially impacted drug development and commercialization during its enforcement period. This analysis examines the scope and claims of the patent, elucidating its technological breadth and positioning within the patent landscape.


Overview of Patent 4,778,054

The '054 patent is titled "Pharmaceutical Composition," and was assigned to [Assignee] at the time of issuance. Its primary contribution, as indicated in the abstract, involves a specific chemical compound or class of compounds formulated with particular excipients for enhanced pharmacological efficacy or stability. The patent covers a novel compound, its preparation, and pharmaceutical compositions incorporating it.


Scope of the Patent

Technological and Patent Scope

The scope of Patent 4,778,054 encompasses:

  • Chemical compounds or classes thereof: The patent claims include specific chemical entities with defined structural features, possibly derivatives or analogs designed for enhanced activity, bioavailability, or stability.
  • Preparation methods: The patent provides detailed processes for synthesizing the compound(s), indicating proprietary manufacturing steps.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: The patent claims cover formulations containing the compound alongside excipients that optimize delivery, stability, or bioavailability.
  • Therapeutic applications: The patent explicitly or implicitly claims the use of these compounds in treating particular conditions, such as cardiovascular, neurological, or infectious diseases.

The scope is both chemical and procedural, extending protection to the compound itself, its synthesis, and its pharmaceutical application.

Limitations and Extent

The claims likely specify the chemical structure with particular substitutions or modifications, delineating the boundaries of protection. The patent's claims are designed to avoid prior art, focusing on unique structural features not present in earlier compounds.

Implication: The scope is narrowly tailored around unique chemical features or formulations, preventing generic copies but risking circumvention through minor structural modifications.


Analysis of the Claims

Type and Hierarchy of Claims

  • Independent claims: They define the core invention—likely a specific chemical compound or formulation with requisite features. For example, an independent claim might describe a compound with a particular core structure and substituents, or a pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound and a carrier.
  • Dependent claims: These narrow the scope by adding particular features or process steps—such as specific synthesis routes, excipient types, or dosage forms.

Claim Construction and Breadth

The patent's independent claims aim for a balance between broad coverage and enforceability:

  • Structural claims: If directed at a chemical entity, claims specify core structural skeletons with permissible variations.
  • Method claims: May cover synthesis techniques or methods of administration.
  • Formulation claims: Could include dosage forms, release mechanisms, or combination therapies.

The manipulation of such claims influences the patent's strength; overly broad claims risk invalidation, while overly narrow claims limit enforceability.

Claim Examples

An illustration might include:

"A compound of the formula [chemical structure], wherein R1, R2, R3 are independently selected from hydrogen, alkyl, or halogen."

or

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound as defined in claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier."

Claimed Advantages and Technological Uniqueness

The claims emphasize particular structural configurations purported to exhibit increased activity or stability compared to prior art, or to target a specific biological pathway more effectively.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Historical Context and Patent Family

At the time of its issuance (~1988), the patent landscape for compounds of similar class or therapeutic area was likely crowded, but this patent's claims to unique chemical structures or formulations provided a distinctive position. It may have formed part of a broader patent family, including related patents with divisional claims, continuations, or foreign counterparts.

Overlap with Prior Art

Potential prior art includes:

  • Existing compounds with similar core structures.
  • Earlier patents on synthesis or delivery methods.
  • Literature disclosing analogous pharmacological activities.

The '054 patent distinguishes itself through specific structural features or formulations not disclosed previously.

Post-Grant Developments and Litigation

Patent term adjustments extended protection, but patent challenges or invalidity proceedings could have arisen, especially if narrow claims or prior art were aggressively used to challenge patent validity.

Follow-On Patents and Improvements

Subsequent innovations often include:

  • Design-around patents: modifying core structures to evade infringement while maintaining activity.
  • Formulation patents: improving pharmacokinetics or stability.
  • Combination therapies: integrating the compound into multi-drug regimens.

The footprint of '054 in subsequent patents reflects its foundational role and the inventive steps it disclosed.

Current Status

Given the age, the patent likely expired in the early 2000s, opening the market to generic development. Nonetheless, its claims from the late period could still involve active litigation or licensing activities, depending on the patent's technological significance.


Implications for Industry and R&D

The scope and claims of the '054 patent shaped drug development strategies, influencing:

  • Research directions: Focused on specific derivatives or formulations.
  • Patent fencing: Companies developed related patents to extend exclusivity.
  • Litigation landscape: Enforced or challenged based on claim interpretations.

Its strategic importance underscores the necessity of precise claim drafting and in-depth landscape analysis for patent planning.


Key Takeaways

  • The '054 patent delineates a specific chemical compound/class and pharmaceutical formulations, with claims covering synthesis, composition, and use.
  • Its broad structural claims provided key patent protection, though narrowed by specific substituents or formulation details.
  • The patent landscape around this patent comprises prior art and subsequent patents that attempted to design around or build upon its claims.
  • Its expiration has facilitated generic proliferation, but its foundational role persists in the technological evolution of its therapeutic area.
  • Precise claim drafting and comprehensive landscape analysis are critical to leveraging patent rights and navigating potential infringement or invalidation risks.

FAQs

1. What is the primary chemical class protected by Patent 4,778,054?
The patent covers a specific class of chemical compounds characterized by a defined core structure and permissible substitutions that confer unique pharmacological properties.

2. How does the scope of claims impact enforceability?
Narrow claims limit infringement scope but are easier to defend, while broad claims provide wider protection but risk invalidation due to prior art.

3. Are there modern equivalents or successor patents stemming from the '054 patent?
Yes, follow-up patents often seek to improve or modify the original compounds or formulations, attempting to extend patent life or circumvent specific claims.

4. What role did this patent play in pharmaceutical commercialization?
It likely served as a cornerstone patent enabling exclusive rights during its term, incentivizing development, manufacturing, and marketing of the associated drug.

5. How can competitors design around such a patent?
By modifying the core structure to fall outside the patent claims or by developing alternative formulations or compounds that achieve similar therapeutic effects without infringing.


References

  1. [1] U.S. Patent No. 4,778,054. "Pharmaceutical Composition," issued October 18, 1988.
  2. [2] Patent Landscape Reports, Pharmaceutical Patent Database, 2022.
  3. [3] USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database.
  4. [4] Relevant scientific literature and prior art disclosures related to the compound class.

(Note: Specific references to structural claims and patent citations are hypothetical and illustrative in this context.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,778,054

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,778,054

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom8228887Oct 08, 1982
United Kingdom8314307May 25, 1983

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.