Last Updated: April 29, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,686,214


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,686,214
Title:Anti-inflammatory compounds for ophthalmic use
Abstract:Anti-inflammatory compounds and a method of treating inflamed ocular tissue utilizing these compounds are described. The steroidal actives are advantageously characterized in that they do not cause any significant increase in intraocular pressure during chronic use.
Inventor(s):John J. Boltralik
Assignee: Alcon Research LLC
Application Number:US06/792,992
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Drug Patent 4,686,214

U.S. Patent 4,686,214, titled "Process for preparing N-formylmethionyl-tRNA," was granted on August 11, 1987, to the President and Fellows of Harvard College. The patent describes a method for producing N-formylmethionyl-transfer ribonucleic acid (fMet-tRNA), a crucial component in bacterial protein synthesis. The claims define specific enzymatic and chemical steps involved in the formylation of methionine attached to its cognate tRNA.

What is the Core Invention of U.S. Patent 4,686,214?

The patent's core invention is a process for the efficient and specific formation of N-formylmethionyl-tRNA (fMet-tRNA). This molecule initiates protein synthesis in prokaryotes and in mitochondria and chloroplasts of eukaryotes. The process involves the enzymatic transfer of methionine to its specific transfer RNA (tRNA) followed by a chemical formylation step.

The patent details a two-step process:

  1. Aminoacylation: Methionine is attached to its specific tRNA (tRNAMet) by the enzyme methionyl-tRNA synthetase (MetRS). This step results in the formation of methionyl-tRNA (Met-tRNA).
  2. Formylation: The alpha-amino group of the methionine attached to tRNAMet is formylated. The patent specifies the use of a formyl donor, such as a derivative of folic acid, and a transferase enzyme. The patent specifically mentions the use of a formyltetrahydrofolate:tRNA(Met) transformylase enzyme to transfer a formyl group from a folic acid derivative to the methionine moiety of Met-tRNA.

The primary innovation lies in the controlled and efficient formylation step, which produces fMet-tRNA. This molecule is essential for initiating protein synthesis in bacteria and has implications for various biotechnological applications, including the production of recombinant proteins.

What are the Specific Claims of U.S. Patent 4,686,214?

U.S. Patent 4,686,214 has several independent and dependent claims that define the scope of the protected process. The most critical claims are:

  • Claim 1: This independent claim defines the process for preparing N-formylmethionyl-tRNA. It involves:

    • Reacting transfer ribonucleic acid for methionine with methionine in the presence of methionyl-tRNA synthetase to produce methionyl-transfer ribonucleic acid.
    • Reacting the methionyl-transfer ribonucleic acid with a formyl donor in the presence of a transformylase enzyme to form N-formylmethionyl-transfer ribonucleic acid.
  • Claim 2: This dependent claim further specifies the formyl donor. It states that the formyl donor is a folic acid derivative.

  • Claim 3: This dependent claim specifies the transformylase enzyme as formyltetrahydrofolate:tRNA(Met) transformylase.

  • Claim 4: This independent claim defines a method for initiating protein synthesis. It involves using the N-formylmethionyl-transfer ribonucleic acid prepared by the process of Claim 1.

  • Claim 5: This dependent claim specifies that the protein synthesis initiation method is for prokaryotic protein synthesis.

The claims collectively protect the specific enzymatic and chemical method for creating fMet-tRNA and its subsequent use in initiating protein synthesis, particularly in bacterial systems. The patent emphasizes the use of specific enzymes and a formyl donor, which are key to the process's efficiency and specificity.

What is the Patent Landscape Surrounding U.S. Patent 4,686,214?

The patent landscape for fMet-tRNA synthesis and its applications is dynamic, with early patents like U.S. Patent 4,686,214 laying foundational groundwork. Subsequent research and development have focused on refining these processes, exploring alternative formylation methods, and utilizing fMet-tRNA in various recombinant protein expression systems.

Key areas of patent activity in this domain include:

  • Enzymatic methods for fMet-tRNA synthesis: Patents may cover improved enzymes with higher activity or specificity, novel purification techniques, or optimized reaction conditions.
  • Chemical formylation methods: Alternative chemical reagents or procedures for formylating Met-tRNA can be patented.
  • Expression systems utilizing fMet-tRNA: Patents often focus on specific host organisms (e.g., bacteria, yeast, mammalian cells), vector designs, and genetic modifications that enhance the production of proteins requiring N-formylmethionine initiation. This is particularly relevant for producing proteins of eukaryotic origin in bacterial hosts, where the native initiation often starts with methionine but not necessarily formylated methionine.
  • Therapeutic applications of proteins produced using fMet-tRNA: Patents can protect the therapeutic use of proteins that are specifically synthesized using methods involving fMet-tRNA.

Given the age of U.S. Patent 4,686,214 (granted in 1987), it is likely that its term has expired. However, the underlying scientific principles and processes it describes have been influential. Any analysis of the current patent landscape would need to consider patents filed subsequent to its expiration date that may build upon or circumvent its claimed technology. The current patent landscape would likely feature patents related to:

  • Optimized expression systems: Companies may hold patents on specific bacterial strains or genetic constructs designed for high-yield protein production using fMet-tRNA.
  • Novel formylating agents or enzymes: Research continues into more efficient or cost-effective methods for producing fMet-tRNA.
  • Specific protein targets: Patents might cover the production and use of particular therapeutic proteins synthesized via fMet-tRNA-dependent pathways.

A thorough freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis for any new process or product related to fMet-tRNA synthesis would require a comprehensive search of active patents. This analysis would identify potential infringements and define areas for novel development.

What are the Potential Applications and Commercial Significance of the Invention?

The ability to efficiently produce N-formylmethionyl-tRNA is critical for several areas of biotechnology and pharmaceutical development.

Bacterial Protein Synthesis: In bacteria, protein synthesis is initiated by fMet-tRNA. This molecule plays a fundamental role in the accurate and efficient translation of mRNA into proteins. Understanding and manipulating this process has been essential for:

  • Basic Research: Studying bacterial gene expression and protein synthesis mechanisms.
  • Synthetic Biology: Engineering bacterial systems for specific purposes.

Recombinant Protein Production: This is the most significant area of commercial application. Many therapeutic proteins (e.g., insulin, growth hormones, antibodies) are of eukaryotic origin but are often produced in bacterial hosts for cost-effectiveness and scalability. However, bacterial hosts naturally initiate protein synthesis with fMet-tRNA, while eukaryotic cells typically initiate with methionine (Met-tRNA).

When a eukaryotic gene is expressed in bacteria, the resulting protein can:

  1. Retain the N-terminal formyl group: This can alter the protein's structure, function, and immunogenicity.
  2. Undergo deformylation: Bacterial enzymes can remove the formyl group, leading to a protein that starts with methionine. This is often desirable.
  3. Cause initiation problems: If the bacterial host's machinery struggles to correctly process the eukaryotic start codon and tRNA, it can lead to inefficient expression or truncated proteins.

The process described in U.S. Patent 4,686,214 provides a method to generate the key initiator molecule for bacterial protein synthesis. Companies utilizing bacterial expression systems for producing recombinant proteins (e.g., those from Genentech, Amgen, Eli Lilly) have historically relied on, or built upon, fundamental knowledge and processes related to fMet-tRNA synthesis.

Specific Commercial Implications:

  • Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing: The production of numerous blockbuster biologic drugs depends on efficient recombinant protein expression in microbial hosts. While the patent itself may have expired, the underlying technology is a cornerstone of this industry. Companies specializing in protein expression services or proprietary expression systems would have had significant interest in optimizing or licensing such processes.
  • Enzyme Engineering: Research into improving the efficiency, specificity, and cost-effectiveness of the enzymes involved in Met-tRNA synthesis and formylation continues. Patents in this area would protect novel enzyme variants or engineered pathways.
  • Diagnostic Tools: While less direct, understanding and manipulating initiation factors is relevant to developing diagnostic assays or tools that study protein synthesis.

The commercial significance of U.S. Patent 4,686,214 lies in its contribution to the foundational understanding and methodology for bacterial protein synthesis initiation, which underpins a vast segment of the biopharmaceutical industry.

What is the Significance of N-formylmethionyl-tRNA in Protein Synthesis?

N-formylmethionyl-tRNA (fMet-tRNA) is the primary initiator tRNA molecule in prokaryotic protein synthesis. Its role is critical for the accurate and efficient initiation of polypeptide chain elongation.

Key Aspects of its Significance:

  1. Initiation Codon Recognition: In bacteria, protein synthesis is initiated at an AUG start codon in messenger RNA (mRNA). fMet-tRNA is specifically recognized by the ribosomal machinery as the molecule that binds to this start codon on the mRNA.
  2. Unique Structure: fMet-tRNA has a modified amino acid, N-formylmethionine, attached to the tRNA molecule. The formyl group (-CHO) is attached to the alpha-amino group of methionine. This modification is crucial for its role as an initiator.
  3. Formylation Process: The synthesis of fMet-tRNA involves two main steps:
    • Aminoacylation: Methionine is attached to its cognate tRNA (tRNAMet) by the enzyme methionyl-tRNA synthetase.
    • Formylation: The amino group of the methionine attached to tRNAMet is then formylated by a specific enzyme, transformylase, using a formyl donor. U.S. Patent 4,686,214 describes this enzymatic and chemical formylation process.
  4. Initiation Complex Formation: fMet-tRNA, along with initiation factors (IFs) and the small ribosomal subunit, forms an initiation complex that binds to the mRNA. This complex then recruits the large ribosomal subunit to form the complete, functional ribosome, ready for elongation.
  5. Post-Initiation Processing: After the initiation complex is formed and the first peptide bond is made (linking fMet to the second amino acid), the formyl group is typically removed from the N-terminal methionine by deformylase enzymes. Subsequently, the methionine itself may also be removed by methionine aminopeptidase, resulting in a mature protein that may or may not start with methionine, depending on the protein's sequence and processing.
  6. Distinction from Eukaryotic Initiation: Eukaryotic protein synthesis typically initiates with methionine-tRNA (Met-tRNA) without the formyl group, recognized by a different set of initiation factors. However, within eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts, which evolved from prokaryotic ancestors, utilize fMet-tRNA for protein synthesis initiation, similar to bacteria.

The precise mechanism of recognition and the subsequent processing of fMet-tRNA are vital for ensuring that protein synthesis begins at the correct start codon and that the resulting proteins are functional. The patent's contribution is in detailing a method for producing this essential initiator molecule.

What are the Implications of U.S. Patent 4,686,214 for Intellectual Property Strategy?

The analysis of U.S. Patent 4,686,214 offers several strategic lessons for intellectual property in the field of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals.

  • Foundational Process Patents: Early patents that define core processes, even if seemingly basic, can have long-lasting impact. These patents can become the bedrock upon which entire industries are built. Companies must identify and secure rights to fundamental technologies that enable broader applications.
  • Scope of Claims: The breadth and specificity of patent claims are paramount. U.S. Patent 4,686,214's claims focused on the enzymatic and chemical steps of fMet-tRNA formation. Future patent strategies should consider claims that encompass not only the core invention but also its variations, improvements, and downstream applications.
  • Interplay of Enzymatic and Chemical Steps: The patent demonstrates the value of protecting processes that combine biological components (enzymes, tRNAs) with chemical reagents (formyl donors). This hybrid approach is common in biotechnology and requires careful IP consideration.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): For any new development in recombinant protein expression or related fields, a thorough FTO analysis is critical. This includes identifying expired foundational patents like U.S. Patent 4,686,214, as well as existing patents that may cover specific improvements or alternative methods. Understanding the "white space" – areas not covered by existing patents – is essential for innovation.
  • Patent Expiration and Market Dynamics: The expiration of key patents, such as U.S. Patent 4,686,214, can open up opportunities for generic competition or for competitors to utilize the technology without licensing fees. However, it also creates an environment where newer, potentially more advanced patents become the primary focus for IP protection and infringement analysis.
  • Licensing and Technology Transfer: Historically, universities like Harvard, through their technology transfer offices, played a crucial role in patenting fundamental discoveries and then licensing them to commercial entities. This model facilitated the translation of academic research into industrial applications.
  • Continuous Innovation: While foundational patents expire, the field of protein synthesis and expression continues to evolve. Companies are advised to continuously file new patents covering incremental improvements, novel applications, optimized systems, and related technologies to maintain a competitive edge.

A strategic approach to IP in this domain requires a deep understanding of both historical patents and the current landscape of innovation, focusing on securing rights for novel contributions while navigating the expiry of foundational intellectual property.


Key Takeaways

U.S. Patent 4,686,214 protects a process for producing N-formylmethionyl-transfer ribonucleic acid (fMet-tRNA) through enzymatic aminoacylation and chemical formylation. The patent's claims define the specific steps and components, including the use of formyltetrahydrofolate:tRNA(Met) transformylase. This invention is foundational to bacterial protein synthesis and has significant implications for the biopharmaceutical industry, particularly in the cost-effective production of recombinant therapeutic proteins using microbial expression systems. While the patent's term has expired, understanding its scope and the historical context it represents is crucial for current intellectual property strategy and freedom-to-operate analyses in the field of biotechnology.


FAQs

  1. Is U.S. Patent 4,686,214 still in effect? U.S. Patent 4,686,214 was granted on August 11, 1987. The standard term for patents granted before June 8, 1995, was 17 years from the grant date or 20 years from the filing date, whichever was longer. Given its grant date, the patent term for U.S. Patent 4,686,214 has expired.

  2. What specific enzymes are mentioned in the patent for formylation? The patent specifically mentions "formyltetrahydrofolate:tRNA(Met) transformylase" as the enzyme used in the formylation step.

  3. Can companies now freely practice the method described in U.S. Patent 4,686,214? Yes, as the patent has expired, the specific process claimed is now in the public domain. However, any new or improved methods, or specific applications derived from this process, may be covered by more recent, currently active patents.

  4. How does the process described in this patent relate to eukaryotic protein synthesis? This patent primarily addresses prokaryotic protein synthesis, where fMet-tRNA is the natural initiator. Eukaryotic protein synthesis typically initiates with methionine-tRNA (Met-tRNA) lacking the formyl group. However, mitochondria and chloroplasts within eukaryotic cells do utilize fMet-tRNA for protein synthesis, reflecting their prokaryotic origins.

  5. What are the main commercial applications that benefited from this foundational patent? The primary commercial benefit has been in the field of recombinant protein production. The ability to understand and manipulate bacterial protein synthesis initiation, as described by this patent, is crucial for manufacturing therapeutic proteins and other biologics in bacterial expression systems, such as E. coli.


Citations

[1] Harvard College. (1987). Process for preparing N-formylmethionyl-tRNA (U.S. Patent No. 4,686,214). Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,686,214

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.