Share This Page
Details for Patent: 4,569,937
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Summary for Patent: 4,569,937
| Title: | Analgesic mixture of oxycodone and ibuprofen | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract: | Pharmaceutical compositions of narcotic analgesics and ibuprofen have been found to exhibit unexpectedly enhanced analgesic activity by applying an analysis model which considers data characterizing the analgesic effect of both the pure components as well as the fixed dose ratio combinations. This synergism enables the use of lower doses of either or both drugs with a concomitant reduction in risk of possible side effects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventor(s): | Geraldine L. Baker, William K. Schmidt | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assignee: | Bristol Myers Squibb Pharma Co | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Application Number: | US06/700,654 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims | Use; Composition; Dosage form; | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims: | United States Patent 4,569,937: Oxycodone-Ibuprofen Combination Claims, Expiration, and Patent LandscapeU.S. Patent No. 4,569,937 protects pharmaceutical compositions combining oxycodone, or an acceptable salt, with ibuprofen, or an acceptable salt, at an approximate weight ratio of 1:6 to 1:400. The patent also covers oral dosage forms, compositions containing pharmaceutical carriers, and methods of treating pain with the claimed combinations. The patent issued on February 11, 1986, and its ordinary 17-year term expired on February 11, 2003. It therefore does not create a current blocking right against generic or branded products. The patent is technically relevant to oxycodone/ibuprofen products such as Combunox, which contains oxycodone hydrochloride 5 mg and ibuprofen 400 mg. That commercial ratio is 1:80 by stated ingredient weight and falls within the claimed range. The patent’s commercial significance today is historical and analytical rather than exclusionary. What does U.S. Patent 4,569,937 protect?U.S. Patent 4,569,937 claims a combination product and associated analgesic methods. Its central limitation is the combination of two active ingredients:
The required weight ratio of oxycodone to ibuprofen is approximately 1:6 through 1:400.
Claim 1 is the broadest composition claim. Claims 2 and 3 narrow claim 1 by specifying dosage-form and carrier characteristics. Claims 4 through 6 are method claims that depend on the corresponding composition claims. How broad is the ratio limitation in Patent 4,569,937?The claimed ratio extends from 1 part oxycodone to approximately 6 parts ibuprofen through 1 part oxycodone to approximately 400 parts ibuprofen. Expressed as ibuprofen relative to oxycodone:
The word “about” gives the ratio some flexibility, but it does not remove the need for a meaningful relationship to the 1:6-to-1:400 range. A product materially outside the range would have a stronger non-infringement position, subject to claim construction and the doctrine of equivalents. The ratio must also be assessed against the relevant form of each ingredient. Oxycodone may be present as oxycodone base or oxycodone hydrochloride, while ibuprofen may be present as the free acid or a salt. A product analysis should determine whether the ratio is calculated using labeled ingredient weight, active-moiety weight, molecular-equivalent weight, or another legally relevant basis. Does Combunox fall within the composition claims?Combunox contains oxycodone hydrochloride 5 mg and ibuprofen 400 mg per tablet. The stated ratio is 5:400, or 1:80. That ratio is inside the numerical range of claim 1. The product also fits the general structure of claims 2 and 3:
The formulation’s commercial relevance does not mean that Patent 4,569,937 currently blocks Combunox or a generic equivalent. The patent expired in 2003. Patent scope and present enforceability are separate questions. The FDA approved Combunox under NDA 021389 for the short-term management of acute pain severe enough to require an opioid analgesic and for which alternative treatments are inadequate. The approved strength is oxycodone hydrochloride 5 mg and ibuprofen 400 mg per tablet (FDA, 2017). When did U.S. Patent 4,569,937 expire?Patent 4,569,937 issued on February 11, 1986. For a patent filed before June 8, 1995, the ordinary term was generally 17 years from issuance, subject to statutory adjustments and terminal disclaimers. On that basis, the patent expired on February 11, 2003.
No current patent infringement action can be based solely on an expired patent. The expired patent may remain relevant as prior art, as evidence of technical development, or in evaluating later patent validity and obviousness. What is the claim-by-claim scope of Patent 4,569,937?Claim 1: Combination compositionClaim 1 requires the presence of both active ingredients. A composition containing oxycodone alone or ibuprofen alone does not satisfy the literal combination requirement. The claim covers:
The claim does not appear limited to a particular tablet size, release profile, excipient system, indication, manufacturing process, or brand. Claim 2: Oral dosage formClaim 2 narrows claim 1 to an oral dosage form. Tablets, capsules, and other oral dosage presentations could fall within this category if they satisfy the underlying composition and ratio limitations. The claim does not, on the supplied language, require immediate release, extended release, a specific dissolution profile, a particular tablet coating, or a defined dose. Claim 3: Pharmaceutical carrierClaim 3 adds a suitable pharmaceutical carrier. In practical terms, this captures conventional pharmaceutical formulations containing excipients, diluents, binders, lubricants, coatings, disintegrants, or related carriers. Because most finished pharmaceutical products contain excipients, claim 3 would likely have covered ordinary commercial dosage forms during the patent term. Claims 4 through 6: Methods of alleviating painThe method claims require:
Claim 4 is narrower because it requires the composition of claim 3. Claim 5 refers directly to claim 1. Claim 6 requires the oral dosage form of claim 2. The method claims are not limited, on the supplied language, to a named pain condition, patient age, surgical procedure, dosing schedule, or treatment duration. The “synergistic” characterization in claim 1 may create a factual issue concerning the claimed combination’s pharmacological relationship, but the provided claim text does not state a specific quantitative synergy test. What formulations are protected by Patent 4,569,937?The patent’s formulation protection is broad at the ingredient-combination level and comparatively narrow at the ratio level. It does not appear to claim a proprietary delivery technology. Potentially covered during the patent term were:
The patent does not, based on the supplied claims, specifically protect:
Later patents could have protected narrower formulation improvements, but such patents would need to be analyzed separately from Patent 4,569,937. What was the Orange Book status of Patent 4,569,937?Patent 4,569,937 cannot currently provide Orange Book exclusivity because it expired in 2003. The FDA Orange Book identifies patents and regulatory exclusivities associated with approved drug products, but an expired patent does not create a present statutory bar to ANDA approval. For an oxycodone/ibuprofen product, Orange Book analysis should distinguish among:
Patent 4,569,937 is not a current basis for delaying approval of an abbreviated application. A generic applicant would not need to make a Paragraph IV certification against an expired patent. Paragraph IV certification is relevant when a listed patent remains unexpired and the applicant asserts that the patent is invalid, unenforceable, or not infringed under the Hatch-Waxman framework (21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(A)(vii)(IV)). Are there Paragraph IV challenges or generic-entry risks?Patent 4,569,937 itself presents no current Paragraph IV risk because its term ended before the modern commercial lifecycle of many oxycodone/ibuprofen products. Current generic-entry risk would instead depend on:
A generic applicant could pursue an ANDA if it can demonstrate pharmaceutical equivalence and bioequivalence to the reference product. The expired combination patent would not prevent approval. Does Patent 4,569,937 create biosimilar risk?No. Biosimilar law applies to biological products, not small-molecule combinations such as oxycodone and ibuprofen. The relevant pathway is generally an ANDA under section 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, not a biosimilar application under section 351(k) of the Public Health Service Act. The competitive threat is therefore generic substitution, not biosimilar entry. How strong was the patent estate for oxycodone and ibuprofen?Patent 4,569,937 was strong as a foundational combination patent because claim 1 covered the core two-drug composition across a wide ratio range. Its method claims extended protection to administration for pain treatment. Its limitations were equally material:
The patent was therefore commercially meaningful during its term but has no remaining exclusionary value. What patent litigation and settlement issues affect the product?Patent 4,569,937 is too old to support a current infringement dispute. Any litigation involving a modern oxycodone/ibuprofen product would more likely concern later formulation patents, FDA approval strategy, labeling, controlled-substance compliance, or product-liability claims. A historical Paragraph IV settlement involving a later patent would not revive Patent 4,569,937. Settlement terms must be tied to the specific asserted patents, products, and entry dates. The expired patent cannot independently support a delayed generic launch date. How does this patent compare with later formulation and method patents?
What geographic coverage did Patent 4,569,937 have?The patent provided rights only in the United States. Corresponding foreign applications or patents, if any, would require separate family analysis. U.S. expiration did not automatically determine the term of foreign counterparts. A global freedom-to-operate review should identify:
The U.S. patent’s expiration date cannot be used as a substitute for foreign legal-status analysis. Key Takeaways
FAQs About U.S. Patent 4,569,937Can a generic manufacturer launch an oxycodone/ibuprofen product despite Patent 4,569,937?Yes. The patent expired in 2003 and cannot independently block generic entry. Does the patent cover a 5 mg oxycodone and 400 mg ibuprofen tablet?The 5:400 ratio is 1:80, which falls within the claimed approximate range. The patent covered that combination during its enforceable term. Does Patent 4,569,937 cover oxycodone products without ibuprofen?No. The composition claims require both oxycodone and ibuprofen. Is an oxycodone/ibuprofen extended-release product automatically covered?No. It would need to satisfy the claimed ingredients and ratio. Separate extended-release technology could raise distinct patent questions. Can the expired patent be used to challenge a later oxycodone/ibuprofen patent?Yes, as prior art where legally applicable. Expiration does not eliminate its potential evidentiary relevance to novelty or obviousness. References
More… ↓ |
Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,569,937
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Patented / Exclusive Use | Submissiondate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Patented / Exclusive Use | >Submissiondate |
