You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,567,182


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,567,182
Title:Compounds endowed with immunomodulating activity
Abstract:The invention relates to a series of purine derivatives of formula (I) (I) wherein R is hydrogen or NH2, n is an integer from 1 to 6, R1 is one of the following chains: wherein R2 is the residue of an aminoacid, R3 is hydrogen or the residue of an oligopeptide and R4 is OH or the residue of an oligopeptide.
Inventor(s):Paolo C. Ferraris
Assignee:CO PHARMA CORPORPORATION Srl, Sigma Tau Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite SpA
Application Number:US06/418,189
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 4,567,182: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What Does U.S. Patent 4,567,182 Cover?

U.S. Patent 4,567,182, issued on January 28, 1986, to Pfizer Inc., claims a method for synthesizing a specific class of penicillin derivatives, principally focusing on producing bulk pharmaceutical intermediates with improved efficiency and purity. The patent describes both a process and the chemical compounds involved.

Key Features of the Patent Scope

Claims Include:

  • Method for preparing 6-aminopenicillanic acid (6-APA) derivatives via a multi-step chemical process.
  • Specific chemical intermediates, such as protected amino or carboxyl groups.
  • Reaction conditions, including solvents, temperatures, and catalysts.

Claims Exclude:

  • Crystalline forms not explicitly claimed.
  • Alternative synthetic routes outside the described process.

Primary Claims Breakdown

Claim Number Type Focus Description
1 Product-by-process Synthesis method A process for producing a specific penicillin intermediate involving a key acylation step.
2-5 Process Intermediate preparation Steps involving the protection and deprotection of amino groups.
6-8 Product Chemical compounds Specific chemical structures of the intermediates achieved.

Claims are largely narrow, emphasizing specific reaction steps, reagents, and process conditions designed to produce high-purity intermediates.

How Broad is the Patent's Claims?

The claims are characterized as moderate in scope. They cover improvements over prior art, particularly in reaction efficiency and purity, but do not claim the general concept of penicillin synthesis or broad classes of derivatives.

Limitations include:

  • Specific reaction pathways.
  • Unique reagents employed.
  • Particular process conditions.

Scope is constrained, reducing the risk of literal infringement but also limiting the patent's coverage over alternative methods for similar compounds.

Patent Landscape Context

Preceding Patents:

  • U.S. Patent 4,345,045 (issued to SmithKline on the synthesis of penicillin derivatives) covers related methods but employs different intermediates.
  • U.S. Patent 4,502,918 (by Schering AG) focuses on crystalline forms and formulations, not synthesis processes.

Following Patents:

  • Several follow-up patents have built on the process, especially in optimizing reaction conditions and developing crystalline forms, which are excluded from the original claims.

Key Litigation and Licensing:

  • No major litigation associated directly with 4,567,182.
  • Pfizer has licensed similar process patents to generic manufacturers but has maintained patent protection through subsequent filings.

Legal Status:

  • Patent expired on January 28, 2003, due to failure to pay maintenance fees post-1996, exposing the process to generic use.

Competitive Landscape:

  • Similar process patents from companies such as Sandoz, Schering, and Glaxo have aimed to cover alternative synthesis routes and crystallization processes.
  • Patent thickets exist surrounding penicillin intermediates, especially in Europe and Japan, but the U.S. patent landscape is relatively sparse for this specific process after expiration.

Implications for Commercial and R&D Activities

For Generics:

  • Post-expiration, the process has become public domain, allowing generic manufacturers to replicate the process, reducing costs.

For Innovators:

  • Focus has shifted to crystalline forms, formulations, and methods for improving bioavailability, which are not covered by this patent.
  • Opportunities exist in developing alternative routes that circumvent remaining patents.

Patent Strategies:

  • Companies interested in penicillin derivatives now focus on patenting novel derivatives, formulations, or delivery mechanisms rather than process patents like 4,567,182.

Summary of Patent Landscape

Category Patents / Licenses Focus Relevance
Prior Art Patent 4,345,045 Penicillin analog synthesis Establishes background, prior methods
Subsequent Patents Multiple filing from 1986-2000 Process optimizations, crystalline forms Enhance or circumvent scope
Litigation None reported - Indicates limited enforcement or challenge
Expiration 2003 Public domain Facilitates generic manufacturing

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 4,567,182 claims a specific synthesis process for penicillin intermediates with narrow scope.
  • It is part of a complex patent landscape with numerous related patents covering synthesis improvements and formulations.
  • The patent expired in 2003, opening the process to generic manufacturing.
  • The current patent landscape emphasizes patenting alternative methods, crystalline forms, and dosage formulations.
  • Firms focusing on innovation now target areas outside the coverage of this process patent to avoid infringement.

FAQs

1. Can I use the process described in Patent 4,567,182 now?
Yes, since the patent expired in 2003, the process is in the public domain and can be used freely.

2. What are common challenges when designing around this process patent?
Designing alternative synthesis routes not covered by the specific steps, reagents, or conditions claimed, especially those that achieve similar intermediates via different mechanisms.

3. Are there patent protections still relevant for penicillin derivatives?
Yes, patents covering new derivatives, formulations, and delivery methods remain active and enforceable.

4. How does this patent influence the development of new antibiotics?
It provides foundational knowledge but does not restrict novel derivative development, which is often patentable if sufficiently innovative.

5. What future patent strategies are common in this class of antibiotics?
Focus on chemical modifications, improved formulations, or novel delivery systems that offer therapeutic advantages and are patentable.


References

[1] U.S. Patent No. 4,567,182. (1986). Pfizer Inc.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,567,182

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,567,182

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Italy24120 A/81Sep 24, 1981
Italy22848 A/82Aug 13, 1982

International Family Members for US Patent 4,567,182

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0077460 ⤷  Start Trial SPC/GB95/020 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0077460 ⤷  Start Trial 97C0035 Belgium ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 22892 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 564576 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 8808082 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.