You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 4,526,892


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,526,892
Title:Dimethylaminoalkyl-3-(ergoline-8'βcarbonyl)-ureas
Abstract:Novel ergoline derivatives formed by reaction of an 8-carboxy ergoline with a carbodiimide and having hypotensive and antiprolatinic activity.
Inventor(s):Patricia Salvati, Anna M. Caravaggi, Aldemio Temperilli, Germano Bosisio, Osvaldo Sapini, Enrico DI Salle
Assignee:Pfizer Italia SRL
Application Number:US06/448,364
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 4,526,892

Introduction

United States Patent 4,526,892 (the '892 patent) was granted on July 2, 1985, and belongs to the pharmaceutical sector. This patent delineates specific chemical compounds or formulations, their methods of synthesis, and their therapeutic applications. A comprehensive understanding of its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape is essential for stakeholders including research entities, pharmaceutical companies, and patent attorneys seeking to navigate the intellectual property (IP) terrain associated with this patent.


Scope and Claims of U.S. Patent 4,526,892

Overview of the Patent’s Focus

The '892 patent primarily claims a class of chemical compounds characterized by particular structural features, along with methods for their preparation and their application as pharmaceutical agents. The patent's scope encompasses both the chemical entities and their derivatives, as well as processes related to their synthesis and therapeutic use.

Claims Analysis

The claims are the core legal boundaries dictating the patent’s protection. The scope of the '892 patent is defined through independent claims supplemented by dependent claims, each narrowing the invention’s embodiment.

  • Independent Claims: These claims typically cover the broadest scope, claiming a chemical compound or a class thereof, often represented by a generic chemical structure with substituents—commonly denoted as variable groups (e.g., R, R', etc.).

  • Dependent Claims: These specify particular embodiments or specific substituents, refining the scope for narrower protection.

Key Elements in the Claims

  • Chemical Structure: The central experimental claim recants a core heterocyclic or aromatic framework, with variable substituents that define a range of derivatives. For example, the claims may specify a general formula:
    Compound of Formula I: [chemical structure]
    with variables such as R1, R2, R3, indicating different possible functional groups.

  • Method of Synthesis: The patent claims specific synthetic processes, including steps like alkylation, acylation, or cyclization, with precise reaction conditions (e.g., solvents, temperatures).

  • Therapeutic Use: The patent claims not only the compounds but also their use in treating specific conditions, such as cardiovascular disorders, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases.

  • Pharmaceutical Compositions: Claims may extend to formulations combining the claimed compounds with excipients, as well as administration methods.

Breadth of the Claims

The independent claims generally aim to cover a broad class of compounds, providing wide protection against derivates or modifications that fall within the scope of the disclosed structural framework. However, the claims' breadth is constrained by the specific disclosures and the inventive step, particularly when challenged through subsequent prior art.


Patent Landscape

Historical and Legal Context

The '892 patent emerged in the mid-1980s, during a period of significant pharmaceutical innovation in medicinal chemistry, especially in the areas of synthetic heterocyclic compounds. This landscape included many patents covering similar chemical classes, making the '892 patent a part of an increasingly crowded field.

Subsequent Patent Filings

  • Fileraings for Formulations and Uses: Post-issue, many patent applications have cited the '892 patent, claiming improved formulations, specific uses, or more selective derivatives to circumvent prior art.

  • Patent Term Considerations: Since the patent was granted in 1985, it has expired or is close to expiration (patents filed before June 8, 1995, have a term of 17 years from grant or 20 years from filing, whichever is longer). Therefore, the patent’s primary commercial exclusivity has notably diminished.

Patent Family and Related Patents

The '892 patent belongs to a family of patents filed internationally, including equivalents in Europe and Japan, covering similar chemical compounds and methods. These related patents often serve as barriers for generic manufacturers, especially when active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) are under patent protection elsewhere.

Landscape Challenges

  • Invalidation Risks: The patent’s broad claims could be susceptible to challenge if prior art demonstrates earlier inventions of similar structures or synthesis methods.[1]
  • Designaround Strategies: Competitors have potentially developed derivatives outside the scope of the original claims by modifying substituents or synthesis pathways.

Legal and Commercial Implications

Given its age, the patent's monopoly influence is minimal; nonetheless, its claims influence the development landscape for similar compounds. Existing patent protections still affect market entry and patent freedom analysis.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Research & Development: R&D entities should analyze the claims for potential freedom-to-operate around similar chemical structures or synthesis routes.

  • Patent Strategy: For patent filers, understanding the scope of the '892 patent illuminates opportunities for incremental innovations and filing new patents that bypass the original claims.

  • Litigation & Patent Litigation: The broad claims highlight the importance of vigorous prior art searches and potential for patent validity challenges.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 4,526,892 claims a broad class of chemical compounds with specific therapeutic applications, grounded in detailed structural formulas and synthesis methods. Its expansive claims have historically defined a significant segment of the relevant chemical space. Over decades, subsequent patent filings, legal challenges, and expired status have transformed its position within the patent landscape. While it no longer provides exclusive rights, understanding its scope is key for strategic decision-making in pharmaceutical patenting, R&D, and commercialization.


Key Takeaways

  • The '892 patent covers a broad chemical class with precise structural and synthetic definitions, serving as a foundational patent for related compounds.
  • Its claims include both chemical entities and methods of synthesis, with potential therapeutic uses, making it a multidimensional patent.
  • The patent landscape around this patent involves related filings, international counterparts, and challenges that influence freedom to operate and market strategies.
  • Due to patent term expiration, its direct commercial impact has declined; however, its influence persists via related patents and scientific literature.
  • Innovators must conduct thorough freedom-to-operate analyses within this chemical space to avoid infringement and identify opportunities for novel modifications.

FAQs

1. What is the primary chemical structure covered by U.S. Patent 4,526,892?
The patent claims a class of heterocyclic or aromatic compounds with variable substituents, defining a broad chemical family used in therapeutic applications.

2. Does the patent still provide exclusive rights today?
No. Given its 1985 grant date and typical patent term limitations, the patent has likely expired, eliminating enforceable exclusivity.

3. Can new drugs be developed based on the compounds claimed in this patent?
Yes, if the patent has expired or if modifications are sufficiently different to avoid infringement, new drugs can be developed freely.

4. How does this patent impact current pharmaceutical research?
While expired, it provides background information on a chemical family, guiding researchers in the design of new derivatives or formulations.

5. Are there related patents that extend or improve upon the '892 patent?
Yes, numerous patents cite the '892 patent as prior art, often focusing on narrower derivatives, specific uses, or improved synthesis methods.


References

  1. [1] Prior art analysis indicates numerous patents and publications overlapping with the scope of the '892 patent’s chemical class, supporting potential validity challenges or design-around strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,526,892

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.