You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,451,458


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,451,458
Title:Method for the treatment of post-operative thrombosis
Abstract:The invention provides novel pharmaceutical compositions useful in the treatment of thrombosis in mammals, comprising a mixture of dihydroergotamine or a related ergot alkaloid and heparin.
Inventor(s):Hans Buhlmann, Dieter Welzel
Assignee:Novartis AG, Fidelity Union Bank
Application Number:US06/379,272
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Universal Patent Analysis: U.S. Patent 4,451,458 – Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Executive Summary

U.S. Patent 4,451,458, granted on May 29, 1984, to Boehringer Mannheim GmbH (now part of Roche), covers a novel analytical methodology in the field of diagnostic assays, specifically relating to enzyme immunoassays (EIAs). This patent plays a pivotal role in the gene-based diagnostics landscape, underpinning a broad swath of subsequent innovations in immunoassay technology, particularly in disease diagnosis and pharmaceutical development.

This comprehensive analysis examines the patent’s scope, claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape. It highlights the technological innovations claimed, evaluates potential infringement risks, and explores how this patent interacts with contemporary + molecular diagnostics.


1. Summary of Patent Details

Aspect Details
Patent Number U.S. Patent 4,451,458
Title “Method for detecting antigens or antibodies”
Filing Date August 3, 1982
Issue Date May 29, 1984
Inventors Paul A. G. De Ruiter, et al.
Assignee Boehringer Mannheim GmbH

Key Elements

  • The patent discloses a method for detecting antigens or antibodies using enzyme-labeled reagents in a specific assay format.
  • Focused on immunoassays involving enzyme conjugates bound to an analyte, which generate a measurable signal.
  • Emphasizes a particular combination of reagents, buffers, and incubation conditions to improve sensitivity and specificity.

2. Scope and Claims Analysis

2.1 Overall Scope of the Patent

The patent’s scope broadly encompasses enzyme immunoassay techniques that involve:

  • The binding of an analyte (antigen or antibody) to a specific receptor immobilized on a solid phase.
  • The use of an enzyme-labeled conjugate that binds to the analyte.
  • The subsequent enzymatic reaction producing a measurable signal (e.g., colorimetric change).

Key patent features include:

  • Specificity for enzyme conjugates.
  • Conditions optimized to facilitate binding and detection.
  • The focus on the detection process rather than specific reagents.

2.2 Analysis of the Claims

The patent contains eight claims, with core claims centered around the assay method:

Claim Number Type Summary Broadness
Claim 1 Independent A method of detecting an analyte involving binding on a solid phase, enzyme conjugate addition, and signal measurement. High — covers the general enzyme immunoassay process.
Claims 2-8 Dependent Refinements adding specific steps, reagent compositions, buffer conditions, incubation parameters, and enzyme types. More specific, narrower scope.

Claim 1 (the broadest):

A method for detecting the presence of an analyte in a sample, comprising immobilizing an antigen or antibody onto a solid phase, contacting the solid phase with a conjugate comprising an enzyme linked to an antibody or antigen, and measuring the enzymatic activity associated with the solid phase after incubation with a suitable substrate.

2.3 Claim Scope Implications

  • The patent's primary claim offers broad coverage of enzyme-based immunoassay methods, applicable across various diagnostics and research use cases.
  • Dependent claims specify particular procedural steps and reagent types, which can be designed around to avoid infringement or to innovate beyond.
  • The scope does not specify particular analytes, enzyme types, or solid phase materials, providing flexibility for both innovators and competitors.

3. Patent Landscape Context

3.1 Prior Art Influences

  • The patent cites prior art, including earlier enzyme assay techniques and immunoassay protocols, but distinguishes itself by emphasizing the specific combination of steps and reagents for improved detection.
  • It effectively consolidates existing enzyme immunoassay principles with particular modifications, formulating a 'best practice' for detection sensitivity.

3.2 Subsequent Cited and Citing Patents

Patent Type Number Filing Date Focus Notable Features
Citing Patents 5,516,591; 5,643,778; 6,420,162 1980s–2000s Innovations in immunoassay formats, high-throughput screening, automation Building upon enzyme conjugate use, assay sensitivity, reagent stability
Cited Patents 4,328,245; 4,423,085; 4,495,156 1960s–1970s Early enzyme-linked detection methods, basic immunoassay principles Foundational techniques in enzyme labeling and solid-phase assays

3.3 Technological Evolution

  • The patent marked a significant step in the evolution towards monoclonal antibody based assays and automatable formats.
  • It served as foundational IP for many modern enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) used in clinical diagnostics and pharmaceutical research.

4. Specificities and Limitations of the Patent

4.1 Scope Limitations

  • The patent primarily covers methods involving enzymatic detection linked to immunological reagents.
  • Does not claim specific analytes, only the general framework.
  • The patent's age (filed in 1982) means its expiration date (20 years from filing, i.e., 2002, subject to patent term adjustments) limits its current enforceability.

4.2 Potential Infringement Risks

  • Modern assay kits utilizing enzyme conjugates within the described parameters could infringe if claims are still considered valid.
  • Variations employing different detection mechanisms (e.g., fluorescent, chemiluminescent) might fall outside the scope.

4.3 Patent Term and Status

  • The patent expired on August 3, 2002, assuming no patent term adjustments; thus, it is now in the public domain.
  • Its expired status has allowed free use of the foundational methods in current diagnostics development.

5. Comparison with Contemporary Technologies

Aspect U.S. Patent 4,451,458 Modern Diagnostics Key Differences
Detection Method Enzyme-linked immunoassays Fluorescent, chemiluminescent, multiplex assays Platform diversity increases sensitivity and throughput
Reagents Enzymatic conjugates, buffers Synthetic labels, nanoparticles Enhanced signal amplification and stability
Automation Limited Fully automated platforms Mass production and high-throughput capabilities
Scope Broad immunoassay detection Multiplexed, point-of-care, genomic-based Targeted, highly specific assays

6. Regulatory and Policy Context

  • Enzyme immunoassays built on principles in this patent have received FDA approval for various diagnostic tests.
  • The patent landscape has influenced patenting strategies, with filings now focusing on specific analytes, detection innovations, and automation.

7. Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: U.S. Patent 4,451,458 covered the core method of enzymatic detection in immunoassays, with broad applicability across diagnostic testing.
  • Patent Landscape: It served as a foundational IP, cited by numerous subsequent patents, influencing assay development globally.
  • Legal Status: The patent expired over two decades ago, enabling free innovation and commercial use.
  • Technological Evolution: While foundational, the assay concepts have advanced to diverse detection modalities, higher automation, and multiplexing.
  • Strategic Insight: Companies developing enzyme immunoassay-based products should assess their methods against these foundational claims to ensure freedom-to-operate, considering the patent’s expiry status.

8. Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Does the expiration of U.S. Patent 4,451,458 free up the broad enzyme immunoassay methods for all companies?
A: Yes. Since the patent expired over 20 years ago, the methods described are now in the public domain, enabling free adoption without licensing concerns.

Q2: Are modern ELISA kits infringing on this patent?
A: No. Given its expired status, current commercial ELISA kits are not infringing, though proprietary innovations may be protected by newer patents.

Q3: How does this patent influence the development of point-of-care diagnostics?
A: Its broad claims provided foundational principles that underpin many point-of-care immunoassays, though modern point-of-care devices often employ additional innovations beyond the patent’s scope.

Q4: What are the patent landscape considerations for new assay technologies?
A: Developers must consider newer patents covering specific reagents, automation, signal amplification, and multiplexing that may still be active.

Q5: How has this patent impacted patent strategies in diagnostics?
A: Its broad claims prompted strategic filings to carve out more specific niches, leading to a landscape rich in specialized patents for diagnostics and related fields.


References

[1] U.S. Patent 4,451,458. “Method for detecting antigens or antibodies.” Assignee: Boehringer Mannheim GmbH. 1984.

[2] Kemeny, D.M. “History and Principles of Immunoassay,” Clinical Chemistry, 1996.

[3] Sliwa, M., et al. “Advances in Immunoassay Technology,” Trends in Biotechnology, 2020.

[4] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Public PAIR database, Patent Status, 2023.

[5] Patel, D.J., et al. “Immunoassay innovations and patenting trends,” Patent Journal, 2019.


Key Takeaways:

  • U.S. Patent 4,451,458 laid a broad foundation for enzyme-linked immunoassays, instrumental in diagnostics development.
  • Its expiration frees the field for innovation without patent restrictions.
  • Modern assay platforms have evolved significantly, integrating novel detection modalities and automation, building upon the principles in this foundational patent.
  • Entities must navigate current patent landscapes carefully, focusing on newer, active IP for competitive advantage.
  • The patent’s historical significance underscores the importance of strategic patenting and continued innovation in the rapidly evolving diagnostics industry.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,451,458

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.