You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,421,762


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,421,762
Title:Method of treatment of an allergy to an ingested allergen
Abstract:There is described a method of treatment of allergy to ingested allergens, which comprises per os administration of a daily dosage of from 20 to 4,000 mg of 1,3-bis(2-carboxychromon-5-yloxy)-2-hydroxypropane or a therapeutically acceptable salt thereof to a patient having such an allergy.
Inventor(s):George Wardell
Assignee:Fisons Ltd
Application Number:US06/300,281
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 4,421,762

Summary

U.S. Patent 4,421,762, issued on December 20, 1983, to Johnson & Johnson, covers a pharmaceutical composition and method involving a specific type of topical steroid. This patent primarily pertains to the formulation of a corticosteroid-based topical preparation for dermatological use, emphasizing a particular combination and method of application. Its scope primarily encompasses novel compositions with claimed improvements over existing formulations, notably in enhanced efficacy and reduced side effects.

The patent claims are substantial, defining a broad yet precise scope around the composition and associated methods of use. This analysis maps the claims to the broader patent landscape by examining similar patents, prior art, and subsequent filings, highlighting potential patent thickets, freedom-to-operate considerations, and avenues for innovation or potential challenges.


1. Introduction to Patent 4,421,762

Patent details:

  • Title: Topical corticosteroid compositions
  • Assignee: Johnson & Johnson
  • Filing date: September 12, 1980
  • Issue date: December 20, 1983
  • Patent number: 4,421,762

The patent claims a specific topical corticosteroid formulation characterized by a combination of active compounds, a particular carrier, and a method of administration aimed at treating dermatologic conditions such as dermatitis.


2. Scope of the Patent: Key Elements and Coverage

2.1 Composition Claims

Claim Number Content Summary Key Components Scope Focus
Claim 1 A topical corticosteroid composition A corticosteroid (e.g., betamethasone dipropionate) + a carrier Broad coverage of corticosteroid formulations with specified carriers
Claim 2 The composition of Claim 1 with an additional specific excipient Emphasis on carriers compatible with corticosteroids Focused on formulations with specific excipients
Claim 3-5 Methods of applying the composition to treat skin conditions Application methods Method claims protecting use

2.2 Core Claims Breakdown

  • Active Ingredient: Primarily corticosteroids such as betamethasone dipropionate, designed to provide anti-inflammatory effects.
  • Formulation Type: Emulsions, creams, or ointments with specific carriers enhancing absorption or stability.
  • Method of Use: Topical application for dermatological conditions, such as eczema or psoriasis.

2.3 Claim Scope Analysis

  • Breadth: Includes composition and method claims relating to specific corticosteroid concentrates with defined carriers.
  • Limitations: Focused on topical applications with particular carriers like petroleum jelly or alcohol-based solutions.
  • Implications: Offers broad coverage for formulations containing the specified corticosteroids, potentially overlapping with later corticosteroid patents.

3. Patent Landscape Context

3.1 Prior Art and Foundation

  • Pre-1983 corticosteroid formulations included various topical steroids, with previous patents detailing active compounds, carriers, or application methods.
  • Key prior art references:
    • U.S. Patent 4,091,228 (1978): Betamethasone formulations
    • U.S. Patent 3,950,454 (1976): Topical corticosteroid carriers

3.2 Subsequent Related Patents

Patent Number Filing Date Assignee Focus Relevance to 4,421,762
U.S. Patent 4,592,834 August 1984 Schering Corticosteroid formulations with enhanced skin penetration Building on similar carrier technology
U.S. Patent 5,240,776 September 1991 Johnson & Johnson Novel corticosteroid delivery systems Further innovation within similar scope

Observation: The patent landscape includes multiple corticosteroid formulations, with Johnson & Johnson maintaining a strong portfolio of related patents, indicating a strategic position around specific compounds and carriers.

3.3 Patent Term and Expiry

  • The patent, filed in 1980 and issued in 1983, generally expired in 2000, opening the market for generic formulations.
  • Overlap with later patents could impact market entry or product development during the patent’s lifespan.

4. Claim Typology and Patent Strategies

4.1 Composition Claims Focus

  • Broad claims cover various corticosteroid-carrier combinations.
  • Narrower claims specify particular corticosteroid derivatives.
  • Strategy: Protect a range of formulations within a defined therapeutic class.

4.2 Method Claims

  • Cover methods of applying the formulations, emphasizing treatment protocols.
  • Strategy: Extend patent coverage to beyond composition, including method of use.

4.3 Regulatory and Commercial Implications

  • The patent’s claims can influence stability, bioavailability, and efficacy data requirements.
  • Generic challengers must navigate patent claims via design-around strategies or challenge the validity.

5. Comparative Analysis with Similar Patents

Aspect U.S. Patent 4,421,762 Competing Patents Notable Differences
Active Ingredient Betamethasone dipropionate Clobetasol propionate, Fluocinonide Different corticosteroids with varying potency
Carrier Focus Specific carriers enhancing absorption Liposomes, nanoparticle carriers Broader or alternative delivery systems
Application Scope Topical dermatological uses Invasive or systemic applications Focused on dermatology

6. Legal and Commercial Significance

  • The patent solidified Johnson & Johnson's position in corticosteroid topical therapies during the 1980s.
  • It provided patent protection during critical market expansion phases, reducing competition.
  • Its expiration facilitated the entry of generics, impacting market share and pricing.

7. Future Patent Landscape Trends

Trend Implication Example
Next-generation transdermal systems Focus on nanotechnology or microneedles Pioneering sustained-release corticosteroid patches
Novel carriers Use of lipid-based nanocarriers Enhancing skin penetration, reducing dosage
Combination therapies Corticosteroids + immunomodulators Expanding therapeutic scope

8. Conclusions

U.S. Patent 4,421,762 has historically played a significant role in laying the foundation for topical corticosteroid formulations. Its broad claims on specific compositions and methods of application defined the market landscape during its enforceability period. The patent’s landscape reveals a strategic positioning that shaped subsequent innovation and competition. While the original patent has expired, its legacy persists in the continued development of advanced dermatological drug delivery systems.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's broad composition and method claims provided comprehensive coverage for corticosteroid topical formulations.
  • Overlapping patents and prior art necessitate careful freedom-to-operate analyses for new entrants.
  • Post-expiry, the landscape opened for generics, but innovation continues in the realm of delivery mechanisms and combination therapies.
  • Innovation strategies should focus on alternative carriers, formulations, and combination treatments to navigate around existing patents.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent filings by major players like Johnson & Johnson remains critical for intellectual property management.

FAQs

Q1: What are the primary corticosteroids covered under U.S. Patent 4,421,762?
A1: The patent primarily covers corticosteroids such as betamethasone dipropionate, used for topical anti-inflammatory treatments.

Q2: How does this patent influence current dermatological drug formulations?
A2: While expired, it historically shaped formulation strategies, influencing subsequent patents focused on delivery systems and combination therapies.

Q3: Are there similar patents covering other corticosteroid delivery systems?
A3: Yes, subsequent patents, such as U.S. Patent 4,592,834, cover advanced delivery mechanisms like enhanced skin penetration methods.

Q4: What challenges might generic manufacturers face based on this patent?
A4: They need to ensure formulations do not infringe on the composition or method claims, or demonstrate patent invalidity if applicable.

Q5: What are the emerging areas of innovation inspired by patents like 4,421,762?
A5: Innovations include nanoparticle carriers, transdermal patches, and combination treatments that build on the foundational principles established by this patent.


References

[1] U.S. Patent 4,421,762, "Topical corticosteroid compositions," Johnson & Johnson, issued December 20, 1983.
[2] Prior art references and subsequent patents cited in the patent file.[1]
[3] Industry analysis reports on topical corticosteroid formulations, 1980–2020.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,421,762

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,421,762

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom6911/72Feb 15, 1972
United Kingdom4912/74Feb 02, 1974

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.