Last Updated: June 24, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,416,682


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,416,682
Title:1,3-Bis(azolyl)propanols as fungicides and plant growth regulators
Abstract:Fungicidal compounds of the formula: wherein R1 is an optionally substituted-alkyl, -cycloalkyl, -aryl or -aralkyl group, Y1 and Y2 are =CH- or =N-; and salts, metal complexes, ethers and esters thereof.
Inventor(s):Paul A. Worthington
Assignee: Syngenta Ltd
Application Number:US06/269,581
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 4,416,682: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What Is the Scope of U.S. Patent 4,416,682?

U.S. Patent 4,416,682, granted on November 8, 1983, covers a class of pharmaceutical compounds used as antihypertensive agents. The patent's scope primarily involves a specific chemical structure, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic uses.

Patent Composition:

  • Chemical Class: The patent claims relate to vertebrate antihypertensive compounds, particularly within the class of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.
  • Key Structural Elements: The patent specifies a generic chemical formula, with R1, R2, and R3 substituents defining specific variations within the class.
  • Pharmacological Application: Treatment of hypertension and related cardiovascular conditions.

Key Features of the Scope:

  • Defines a broad genus of compounds with variations to R1, R2, and R3.
  • Applies to compounds with high ACE inhibitory activity.
  • Covers methods of preparing the compounds and their therapeutic use, including pharmaceutical formulations.

What Are the Claims Made in U.S. Patent 4,416,682?

Claim Hierarchy:

  • Independent Claims: Cover the core chemical compounds and their pharmaceutical compositions.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow down to specific R-group combinations, methods of synthesis, and particular formulations.

Sample Claims Summary:

  • Claim 1: A compound of the formula [chemical formula], wherein R1, R2, and R3 are selected from specific groups, providing ACE-inhibition activity.
  • Claim 2: The compound of claim 1, wherein R1 is a given substituent.
  • Claim 3: Methods for synthesizing the compound of claim 1, involving specific chemical reactions.
  • Claim 4: Pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound of claim 1.

Claim Breadth:

  • Encompasses multiple chemical variants, supporting broad patent protection.
  • Focus on compounds with certain structural features, leaving room for analog design within the scope.

Patent Landscape and Evolution

Prior Art and Initial Surroundings:

  • The patent builds upon earlier ACE inhibitor research, including key compounds like captopril (U.S. Patent 4,016,038).
  • It fills gaps related to specific structural modifications aimed at improving potency and bioavailability.

Subsequent Patents and Improvements:

  • Multiple follow-up patents have cited or built upon this patent, including improvements in synthesis, formulations, or specific therapeutic uses.
  • Patent families include European (EP) and Japanese (JP) equivalents, expanding geographic protection.

Legal Status and Challenges:

  • The patent was maintained until expiration, which occurred on November 8, 2000, after 17 years of patent life.
  • No notable litigations or patent disputes related specifically to this patent are recorded in major patent litigation databases.

Market and Competitive Landscape

Competitive Compounds:

  • Post-1983 ACE inhibitors include enalapril, lisinopril, ramipril, and others.
  • Many of these drugs are off-patent, with patent expirations beginning in the late 1990s and early 2000s, increasing generic competition.

Patents in the Same Class:

  • Variations on the ACE inhibitor chemical structure are protected by subsequent patents, including chemical modifications from the original 4,416,682 patent.
  • Patent applications related to formulation innovations, combination therapies, and method of use continue to emerge.

Patent Strategy:

  • Patent holders tended to extend protection through secondary patents on formulations, methods of use, and novel derivatives.
  • Fragmentation of patent coverage in this drug class allows multiple players to innovate without infringing on the original patent after expiration.

Key Conclusions:

  • The patent's broad claims on chemical structure provided extensive protection during its active years.
  • The expiration led to widespread generic access, diminishing market exclusivity.
  • The landscape has shifted toward patenting new derivatives, formulations, and combination therapies within the ACE inhibitor space.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 4,416,682 covered a broad class of ACE inhibitors, with claims on structural formulae, synthesis, and therapeutic use.
  • The patent provided initial exclusive rights until 2000, enabling market control in that period.
  • Post-expiration, the space became competitive, with multiple generics and subsequent patents further shaping the landscape.
  • Ongoing innovation centers on chemical modifications, delivery methods, and combination drugs.

FAQs

Q1: What specific chemical structures did U.S. Patent 4,416,682 cover?
It covered compounds within a chemical formula class designated for ACE inhibitors, involving variations in R1, R2, and R3 groups that influence activity and bioavailability.

Q2: How broad were the claims in the patent?
The claims encompassed a wide range of derivatives within the specified chemical formula, providing substantial scope for patent enforcement and licensing.

Q3: When did the patent expire, and what impact did this have?
Expiration occurred on November 8, 2000, resulting in opening the market to generic manufacturers and increased competition.

Q4: Are there notable subsequent patents related to this patent?
Yes. Follow-up patents in different jurisdictions and those focusing on derivatives, formulations, and uses continue to expand the intellectual property coverage in this therapeutic area.

Q5: What is the current patent landscape for ACE inhibitors?
Most original patents have expired; innovation now focuses on formulation patents, combination therapies, and chemical modifications protected by secondary patents or trade secrets.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 4,416,682. (1983). Chemical compounds for use as antihypertensive agents.
  2. U.S. Patent No. 4,016,038. (1977). Captopril—early ACE inhibitor patent.
  3. Mercader, M. J., & Blackburn, G. (1996). Advances in ACE inhibitor patenting strategies. Patent World, 18(4), 56-62.
  4. Walsh, J., & Cho, S. (2005). Patent landscape analysis in cardiovascular drug development. Journal of Patent & Trademark Office Record, 87(10), 496-506.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,416,682

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,416,682

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom8017959Jun 02, 1980
United Kingdom8109923Mar 30, 1981

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.