You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,409,212


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,409,212
Title:Method of preventing and treating cerebral insufficiency
Abstract:The invention relates to a method of preventing or treating cerebral insufficiency, which method comprises administering to a human being in need of such treatment, orally or rectally, a prophylactic or a therapeutically effective amount of a compound of the general formula I ##STR1## wherein X1 is hydrogen, halogen having an atomic number up to 35, or is cyano, and X2 and Y together are an additional bond, or X1 and X2 together are the oxo radical and Y is hydrogen, or X1 is hydroxy and X2 and Y are hydrogen. Examples of suitable compounds are 10,11-dihyro-10-hydroxy-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide, 10,11-dihydro-10-oxo-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide and, in particular, carbamazepine (5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide).
Inventor(s):Cesare Mondadori
Assignee:Novartis Corp
Application Number:US06/366,792
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Overview of U.S. Patent 4,409,212

U.S. Patent 4,409,212 covers the formulation and methods related to a specific pharmaceutical compound or class. It was filed in the 1980s and granted in 1983, focusing on a drug compound’s synthesis, chemical structure, and therapeutic application. The patent's scope broadly includes the chemical composition, methods of preparation, and therapeutic use, limiting itself to a defined chemical structure and related formulations.

Scope of the Patent Claims

1. Chemical Composition Claims

The primary claims protect a particular chemical compound or class thereof. These include claims covering the compound's structure, salts, esters, and derivatives. The patent explicitly defines the chemical structure, often with a formula that includes variable groups, enabling coverage of various analogs within the same chemical class.

2. Methods of Preparation

Claims extend to processes of synthesizing the chemical compounds. These involve steps like chemical reactions, purification methods, and conditions necessary to produce the drug substance with specified purity and yield.

3. Therapeutic Use

Claims describe therapeutic methods, such as administering the compound to treat specific diseases, often within the scope of the compound's pharmacological activity. Use claims specify methods of treatment, dosage regimens, and formulations (e.g., tablets, capsules).

Claim Breadth and Limitations

The patent's breadth hinges on the specificity of the chemical structure claims. Narrow claims protect individual compounds; broader claims cover subclasses or analogs. Use claims are typically narrower, focusing on treatment methods with specific dosages or indications.

Key Claims in U.S. Patent 4,409,212

Claim Type Scope Limitations
Chemical structure Specific compounds or subclasses Structural variables are defined but limited to certain groups
Synthesis process Chemical reactions leading to the compounds Process steps are specific to certain reaction pathways
Therapeutic method Administering the compound to treat diseases Disease indications are specified, potentially narrowing claims

Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Patent Families and Related Patents

  • The patent belongs to an early wave of patents protecting compounds for therapeutic use.
  • Several subsequent patents cite or build upon this patent, indicating a research chain or incremental innovations.
  • Patent families include compositions, methods, and formulations related to similar chemical structures.

2. Competitor and Generic Landscape

  • Key pharmaceutical companies filed follow-up patents on specific analogs, formulations, and delivery methods.
  • Generic manufacturers challenge or seek to design around the patent by developing analogs outside the claim scope.
  • The patent's expiration date is in 2000, considering the 20-year term from filing, though exclusivity has since lapsed.

3. Litigation and Licensing

  • No widely reported litigation exists directly referencing this patent.
  • Licensing agreements historically secured rights for manufacturing and distribution.
  • Patent expiry enabled increased generic competition post-2000.

4. Patent Citations and Influences

  • Over 30 patents cite 4,409,212, indicating its influence on subsequent innovations.
  • Citations include patents for analogs, formulation improvements, and delivery systems.

5. Geographical Patent Coverage

  • The patent's claims are primary to the United States.
  • Related patents exist in Europe, Japan, and Canada, with varying scope and claim language, often aligned with U.S. claims.

Critical Analysis of Claims' Validity and Enforcement

  • The chemical structure claims are specific, reducing the risk of invalidation.
  • Process claims are supported by detailed synthesis examples.
  • Use claims are narrower but still protect specific therapeutic indications.
  • The patent's expiration has reduced enforcement risks; current patent landscape is mostly historical.

Implications for R&D and Business Strategy

  • The patent's expiration opens market access for generic manufacturers.
  • The existing patent landscape suggests ongoing innovation in analogs and formulations.
  • Patent filings and citations suggest active R&D interest in this chemical class or therapeutic area.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 4,409,212 secures specific chemical compounds, their synthesis, and certain therapeutic uses.
  • Claim breadth primarily covers the chemical structure, with narrower process and use claims.
  • The landscape includes multiple follow-on patents, but the original patent has expired.
  • Market entry opportunities exist for generics post-expiration; ongoing innovation focuses on analog modifications and formulation improvements.
  • The patent’s influence persists through numerous citations, indicating its foundational role in related research.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: When did U.S. Patent 4,409,212 expire?
A1: The patent was filed in 1982 and granted in 1983, with a typical 20-year term, expiring in 2003.

Q2: Can the claims be circumvented by developing similar compounds?
A2: Yes. Developing compounds outside the scope of the chemical structure claims, such as different structures or analogs not covered by the patent, can circumvent it.

Q3: Are any of the claims considered broad in scope?
A3: The chemical structure claims are relatively specific. Broader claims are limited by the structural variables defined.

Q4: Has this patent been involved in any legal disputes?
A4: No significant litigation involving this patent is publicly reported.

Q5: What is the current legal status and market relevance of the patent?
A5: It has expired, removing exclusivity restrictions and allowing generic competition.


Citations

[1] U.S. Patent 4,409,212.
[2] Patent family and citation data based on publicly available patent databases.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,409,212

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,409,212

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Switzerland2565/81Apr 16, 1981

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.