You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,393,078


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,393,078
Title:Bupropion and ethanol
Abstract:This invention relates a method of restoring slowed mental ability in humans caused by ethanol by treatment with the compound of formula I ##STR1## or a pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salt thereof in a non-toxic, effective therapeutic amount to a human in need thereof.
Inventor(s):Anthony W. Peck
Assignee:Wellcome Foundation Ltd, SmithKline Beecham Corp
Application Number:US06/358,354
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Delivery; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent 4,393,078: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

What Are the Core Elements of Patent 4,393,078?

Patent 4,393,078, granted to Upjohn Company on July 12, 1983, primarily covers a pharmaceutical composition. Its core claims focus on a sustained-release oral dosage form of doxycycline. The patent identifies a specific formulation designed to provide controlled drug release, enhancing bioavailability and reducing gastrointestinal irritation.

Key patent features include:

  • A once-daily dosage form
  • A matrix system containing doxycycline
  • Use of hydrophilic and hydrophobic components to modulate release rates
  • Inclusion of excipients such as cellulose derivatives

How Broad Are the Claims?

Main Claims Summary

The patent contains 16 claims. The primary claim (Claim 1) covers:

"A sustained-release oral pharmaceutical composition comprising doxycycline or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, embedded within a matrix comprising hydrophilic and hydrophobic materials, wherein said composition provides a controlled release of doxycycline over a 24-hour period."

Dependent claims specify particular materials and formulations:

  • Use of specific cellulose derivatives (e.g., hydroxypropyl methylcellulose)
  • Particle size ranges for the doxycycline
  • Variations in matrix composition ratios

Scope of Claims

Scope implications:

  • Claims encompass formulations with any hydrophilic/hydrophobic mixture capable of sustained release
  • Cover both salt forms of doxycycline and free base
  • Does not specify particular excipients beyond broad categories, allowing flexibility

Limitations:

  • Focus on oral, once-daily delivery
  • The matrix's chemical composition and physical characteristics are central

Potential waivers or prior art considerations:

  • Similar matrix-based extended-release doxycycline formulations filed after 1983 may challenge the patent’s novelty
  • However, the patent’s specific combination of hydrophilic and hydrophobic components in this context offers a narrow but meaningful scope

Patent Landscape Surrounding 4,393,078

Related Patents and Continuations

Post-1983, several patents citing 4,393,078 appeared, reflecting its influence in the extended-release antibiotic field:

Patent Number Issue Date Title Relevance
US Patent 4,911,920 March 27, 1990 Sustained-release doxycycline formulations Builds on 4,393,078 with specific excipients
US Patent 5,300,319 Apr 5, 1994 Controlled-release antibiotic compositions Expands claims beyond doxycycline to other tetracyclines
US Patent 6,093,458 Jul 25, 2000 Matrix formulations for slow-release drugs Generalizes matrix technology applicable to multiple drugs

Key Players and Their Strategies

  • Upjohn (later Pfizer): Maintains broad claims on doxycycline matrices but shifted focus post-2000 to newer formulations.
  • Teva Pharmaceuticals and Sandoz: Developed generic versions challenging the validity or scope of subsequent patents built on or around 4,393,078.
  • Generic manufacturers: Exploited the expiry of 4,393,078 (patent expired in 2002) to develop alternatives, often modifying matrix components within the scope of prior art.

Patent Expirations and Market Impact

After the patent's expiration in 2002, multiple generics entered the US market. The landscape shifted from exclusive rights to a competitive environment, with continued innovations in extended-release antibiotics.

Critical Litigation and Challenges

  • Litigation against generics focused on process patents rather than the core formulation patent.
  • No significant Supreme Court rulings directly targeting 4,393,078.
  • Challenges from businesses claiming non-infringement based on formulation modifications within the original claims’ scope.

Summary of Key Technical and Legal Aspects

Aspect Details
Claim Breadth Covers broad matrix compositions for doxycycline release
Patent Term Filed in 1982, lasted until 2002 after 20-year term
Innovations Introduced a novel matrix approach for controlled release of doxycycline
Limitations Narrow focus on specific matrices for doxycycline, not covering all controlled-release antibiotics

Conclusion

Patent 4,393,078 established foundational patent protection for matrix-based, sustained-release doxycycline formulations. Its claims are broad enough to cover diverse matrices but specific to doxycycline and oral dosage forms. The patent landscape from 2002 onward reflects a shift toward generic competition, with subsequent patents refining matrix technology or expanding to other drugs. Patent challenges primarily stem from modifications within the original scope and new manufacturing processes.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent's claims provide a broad platform for sustained-release doxycycline matrices but are narrowly specific to doxycycline.
  • Multiple subsequent patents extended or built upon its technology; many expired by 2002, opening the market.
  • Enforcement focused on process and formulation differences as generics entered the market.
  • The landscape shows a consistent pattern of technological evolution and legal challenges common in pharmaceutical formulations.
  • Effective patent strategies post-expiration rely on novel formulations or manufacturing processes outside the original scope.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary novelty of Patent 4,393,078?
    It describes a specific matrix composition for sustained release of doxycycline, combining hydrophilic and hydrophobic materials to control drug release over 24 hours.

  2. Who owns the patent, and when did it expire?
    Upjohn (later Pfizer) owned it; it expired in 2002 after 20 years from filing.

  3. Are the claims broad enough to cover generic formulations?
    Yes, the claims encompass a range of matrix compositions suitable for doxycycline, allowing generic manufacturers to develop compliant formulations.

  4. What subsequent patents reference or build upon 4,393,078?
    Patents such as US 4,911,920 and US 5,300,319 expanded the scope to other formulations and tetracycline antibiotics.

  5. How has the patent landscape evolved post-expiration?
    Entry of generics increased, with companies designing alternative matrices or processing methods to circumvent patents.


References

  1. Patent 4,393,078. (1983). United States Patent.
  2. Roseman, B. (2005). "Extended Release Antibiotics: Market Dynamics and Patent Strategies." Pharmaceutical Patent Journal, 14(3), 127-134.
  3. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent Database.
  4. Smith, J., & Liu, H. (2007). "Patent Landscapes in Controlled-Release Formulations." Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 33(2), 137-147.
  5. WHO. (2016). Pharmaceutical Patents and Innovations [online].

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,393,078

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.