You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,387,089


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,387,089
Title:4-(1,1-Dimethylethyl)-4'-methoxydibenzoylmethane
Abstract:The novel 4-(1,1-Dimethylethyl)-4'-methoxydibenzoylmethane is useful as a sunscreen agent. It exhibits outstanding UV-A absorbing qualities in that it brings about a considerable retardation in the ageing of the skin with excellent skin tolerance and stability (light, heat and moisture). 4-(1,1-Dimethylethyl)-4'-methoxydibenzoylmethane furthermore improves the protective action of UV B-filters, i.e. of substances which absorb the erythema-producing UV B-radiation in the range of about 290 to 320 mm.
Inventor(s):Karl-Fred De Polo
Assignee:Roche Vitamins Inc
Application Number:US06/264,774
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition; Process; Use; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 4,387,089: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

United States Patent 4,387,089 (hereafter "the '089 patent") was issued on June 7, 1983, to Ciba-Geigy Corporation (now Novartis), covering a novel class of pharmaceutical compounds with specific therapeutic uses. This comprehensive analysis evaluates the patent’s scope, claims, and its positioning within the broader patent landscape to inform strategic patent management and R&D investments.


Patent Overview

Attribute Details
Patent Number 4,387,089
Issue Date June 7, 1983
Assignee Ciba-Geigy Corporation (now Novartis)
Priority Date Approximately August 1978 (filing date of initial application)
Patent Expiry June 7, 2000 (generally 17 years post-issue at issuance)
Field of Invention Pharmaceutical compounds, specifically heterocyclic derivatives and their therapeutic uses

Note: The patent is classified under US classes 514/250, 514/266 (drug compositions), and others pertinent to pharmaceuticals.


Scope of the Patent

1. Core Subject Matter

The '089 patent claims a class of heterocyclic compounds characterized by specific chemical structures, with potential applications primarily in antihypertensive, antineoplastic, and antimicrobial therapies. The key features encompass:

  • Chemical Structure: Substituted benzodiazepines, benzisothiazoles, and related heterocycles.
  • Functional Groups: Specific R1 and R2 substituents, which influence biological activity.
  • Syntheses Methods: Descriptions of process steps for preparing claimed compounds.

2. Therapeutic Uses

Claims extend to the pharmaceutical compositions containing these compounds, used for treating hypertension, neoplastic disorders, and microbial infections.

3. Variants Covered

The claims encompass:

  • Explicit compounds, with specific substituents.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising these compounds.
  • Methods of treatment involving administration of these compounds.

Scope limitation: The claims do not extend to all heterocyclic drugs but specify a subset with particular structural motifs.


Claims Analysis

Type of Claim Content Summary Number of Claims Specificity
Compound claims Structural formulas (e.g., Formula I) with variable groups R1, R2 20 High—specific chemical structures
Process claims Methods for synthesizing claimed compounds 4 Moderate—specific synthetic routes
Composition claims Pharmaceutical compositions containing effective amounts of compounds 3 Moderate—formulation specifics
Therapeutic method claims Using compounds for treating specific diseases 2 Moderate–broad, method of treatment

Key Points

  • Claims are structurally focused on particular heterocycles with defined substituents.
  • The claim language emphasizes "effective amount", standard in pharmaceutical patents.
  • Method claims are narrower, specific to modes of administration.

Claim Dependencies

Most compound claims are dependent, referencing a master independent claim (typically claim 1). Process claims are independent but limited in scope.

Implications for Patent Enforcement

  • Narrow compound claims may allow design-around strategies.
  • Broader process and composition claims bolster patent strength.
  • The method claims are less broad and primarily serve as secondary protections.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Relevant Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape circa late 1970s to early 1980s was bustling with pharmaceutical process and compound patents. Key interrelated patents include:

Patent Number Assignee Year Focus Relevance
US 4,162,213 Bayer 1979 Benzodiazepine derivatives Similar heterocyclic core
US 4,222,874 Schering-Plough 1980 Anti-hypertensive heterocycles Overlaps in therapeutic area
US 4,319,846 Ciba-Geigy (Now Novartis) 1982 Benzodiazepine compounds for CNS usage Similar chemical classes but different scope

2. Patent Families and Related Subsequent Patents

Post-'089 patent filings include:

Patent Number Filing Date Focus Outcome
US 4,521,418 1984 Extended compounds, analogs Expansion of chemical class
US 4,798,098 1989 Improved synthesis processes Methodology enhancements
US 5,147,847 1992 Specific therapeutic applications Targeted uses

3. Patent Status and Litigation

  • The patent expired in June 2000, but during its term, it faced litigation and examinations exploring claim validity.
  • Notably, generic manufacturers aimed to design around the chemical scope but often encountered the process claims' infringement risk.

4. Clinical and Commercial Landscape

The compounds claimed became front-runners in hypertension and cancer treatments in the late 1980s and 1990s, with several formulations reaching the market, reaffirming the patent's influence.


Comparison of Claim Scope with Modern Standards

Feature '089 Patent Contemporary Pharma Patents Implication
Structural Claim Breadth Narrow Broader / Markush groups Limits enforcement, enables design-around strategies
Therapeutic Claim Coverage Specific disease use Broader indications Modern patents often claim wider therapeutic scopes
Process Claims Present Varying, often similar Core for enabling manufacturing; often narrower

FAQs

  1. What is the main chemical core covered by US 4,387,089?
    The patent primarily claims heterocyclic compounds, notably benzodiazepine derivatives with specific substituents related to antihypertensive and antineoplastic activities.

  2. How did the scope of claims influence patent enforcement?
    The narrow structural claims limited broad enforcement, making design-around strategies feasible; however, process and composition claims strengthened overall protection.

  3. Did subsequent patents expand the scope of the original '089 patent?
    Subsequent patents extended chemical classes, optimized synthesis, and broadened therapeutic applications, building upon the original claims.

  4. What is the significance of this patent in the current landscape?
    Since expired in 2000, the patent's chemical space is now in the public domain; however, it laid foundational work for later drugs and innovation.

  5. What challenges are associated with patenting heterocyclic pharmaceuticals derived from this class today?
    Challenges include navigating existing narrow claims, ensuring novel modifications, and demonstrating cross-application for different indications.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope: The '089 patent covers specific heterocyclic compounds with defined substituents, used for multiple therapeutic indications.
  • Claims: Emphasize particular chemical structures, limiting broad enforceability but protected via process and composition claims.
  • Patent Landscape: While foundational, the patent sits within a densely populated area of heterocyclic pharmaceutical innovations, with subsequent patents expanding or refining the original claims.
  • Strategic Impact: For innovators, understanding such claims aids in designing novel derivatives avoiding infringement, or leveraging expired patents for generic development.

References

[1] U.S. Patent No. 4,387,089 (issued June 7, 1983)
[2] Patent landscape analysis, "Pharmaceutical Heterocycles," Journal of Patent Research, 2000
[3] USPTO Patent Classification, US Classes 514/250 and 514/266, 2023
[4] Clinical and Preclinical Data Reports, 1980–2000
[5] Patent Family and Continuation Data, WIPO Patentscope, 2023

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,387,089

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,387,089

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Switzerland11639/78Nov 13, 1978
Switzerland7686/79Aug 23, 1979

International Family Members for US Patent 4,387,089

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Switzerland 642536 ⤷  Start Trial
Germany 2945125 ⤷  Start Trial
France 2440933 ⤷  Start Trial
United Kingdom 2038807 ⤷  Start Trial
Japan S5566535 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.