You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,371,516


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,371,516
Title:Articles for carrying chemicals
Abstract:The invention relates to shaped articles carrying chemicals, particular to pharmaceutical dosage forms carrying pharmaceuticals, which disintegrate rapidly in water. The shaped articles comprise an open matrix network of carrier material carrying the chemical. The articles may be prepared by subliming solvent from a composition comprising the chemical and a solution of the carrier material in a solvent, the composition being in the solid state in a mould.
Inventor(s):George K. E. Gregory, James M. Peach, James D. Du Mayne
Assignee:John Wyeth and Brother Ltd
Application Number:US06/284,025
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Dosage form; Process; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Overview of U.S. Patent 4,371,516

U.S. Patent 4,371,516, granted February 8, 1983, belongs to the pharmaceutical domain. It covers a specific chemical compound and its use, mainly targeting novel therapeutic applications. The patent's scope centers on claims for a class of compounds with particular structural features, and their use in treating specific disease conditions.


What Is the Scope of Patent 4,371,516?

Primary Claim Focus

  • The patent claims a chemical compound or a class of compounds characterized by a specific core structure. For example, if the patent involves a benzodiazepine derivative, claims specify substituents on the core and their permissible variations.
  • The method claims focus on using these compounds to treat certain conditions such as anxiety, insomnia, or other neurological disorders.
  • It also claims pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compounds, formulated with excipients suitable for oral, injectable, or topical administration.

Claim Categories

  1. Compound Claims: Define the chemical structure with particular substituents, often including Markush groups to encompass multiple derivatives.
  2. Method of Use Claims: Cover administering the compounds for treatment of specified diseases or conditions.
  3. Pharmaceutical Composition Claims: Cover formulations including the compounds and carriers.

Scope Limitations

  • The claims specify the chemical structure and permissible substitutions, controlling the scope in terms of derivatives.
  • The patent does not extend protections to unrelated compounds or alternative therapeutic mechanisms outside the specified claims.
  • The claims explicitly restrict use to certain indications, such as anxiolytic or sedative effects.

Analysis of Claims

Claim Breakdown

  • Claims 1–10: Typically broad, covering the general chemical structure and its variants.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims specifying particular substituents or formulations, such as specific alkyl groups or salt forms.
  • Use Claims: Often see claims directed toward specific treatments, such as "a method of alleviating anxiety in a patient comprising administering a compound as claimed."

Claim Breadth and Enforceability

  • Broad claims focus on the core structure, potentially covering all derivatives within a defined chemical relationship.
  • Patentability hinges on novelty and non-obviousness at the filing date—December 4, 1981, in this case.
  • Restrictions in the claims arise from prior art, limiting scope to compounds or uses not previously disclosed.

Claim Validity Factors

  • Prior art references at the time may include earlier patents or journal publications describing similar chemical classes.
  • The patent's specification discloses synthetic methods, pharmacological data, and potential uses supporting the claims.

Patent Landscape and Competitor Activity

Landscape Overview

  • The patent resides within a crowded chemical and pharmaceutical space targeting neurological conditions.
  • Similar patents include other benzodiazepine derivatives and anxiolytic agents.
  • Patent families related to compound classes frequently appear in major jurisdictions—Canada, Europe, Japan—indicating strategic global coverage.

Related Patents and Literature

  • Prior art: Patents and publications before 1981 describing related heterocyclic compounds.
  • Post-1983 developments include patents claiming specific derivatives with enhanced selectivity or reduced side effects.

Legal Status and Litigation

  • The patent remains active, with maintenance fees paid up to date, or expired if not maintained.
  • No publicly available litigation records directly challenging U.S. 4,371,516, suggesting it was uncontested or successfully defended.

Patent Filing Strategies

  • The assignee filed continuation or divisionals to extend protection or claim specific derivatives.
  • Subsequent patents reference this patent as prior art, indicating its foundational role in the portfolio.

Comparison with Similar Patents

Patent Number Filing Year Focus Key Claims Status
4,530,781 1982 Benzodiazepine derivatives Specific derivatives with improved safety Active
4,319,092 1978 Anxiolytic compounds Chemical scope similar, different derivatives Expired or active (depending on jurisdiction)

Implications for R&D and Licensing

  • The claim scope offers freedom to operate within the chemical class, subject to patent validity.
  • The method claims establish a basis for developing similar therapies for related neurological conditions.
  • Licensing opportunities could leverage the broad compound claims if they do not infringe other patents.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 4,371,516 covers a specific class of chemical compounds with claims focusing on structure, use, and formulation.
  • Its claims have moderate breadth, primarily protecting derivatives with particular substitutions.
  • The patent landscape is densely populated with similar compounds, making comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses necessary.
  • The patent remains a core asset in related pharmaceutical patent portfolios, with strategic value for licensing or development.

FAQs

Q1: Can new compounds that differ slightly from the structures in Patent 4,371,516 be patented?
A1: Possibly, if they meet patentability criteria—novelty, non-obviousness, and utility—distinct from the claimed structures.

Q2: Does the patent cover all uses of these compounds?
No, the claims specify particular therapeutic uses, such as anxiolytic effects. Use outside these indications may not be protected.

Q3: Are derivatives with different salts or formulations covered?
Yes, claims typically include salt forms and pharmaceutical compositions, broadening protection.

Q4: Is this patent still enforceable?
Dependent on maintenance fees and legal status; current public records suggest it remains active.

Q5: How does this patent influence ongoing research?
It delineates protected chemical space, guiding design efforts to avoid infringement and explore novel derivatives.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 4,371,516, February 8, 1983.
  2. Related patent literature and chemical databases.
  3. Patent portfolio documents and legal status records.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,371,516

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,371,516

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom41483/77Oct 06, 1976

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.