You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,027,019


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,027,019
Title:3-Oximes of D-17α-ethynyl-19-nortestosterone esters and method
Abstract:3-Oximes of D-17 alpha -ethynyl-19-nortestosterone esters and derivatives thereof have pre- and post-coital activity for the suppression of fertility.
Inventor(s):Arvin Pranlal Shroff
Assignee:Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp
Application Number:US05/652,000
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 4,027,019

Executive Summary

U.S. Patent 4,027,019 (hereinafter “the ‘019 patent”) was issued on June 28, 1977, to Immuno Fine Chemicals Ltd. and covers a novel class of chemical compounds used mainly as pharmaceutical intermediates and active agents. This patent features broad claims related to specific chemical structures, primarily focusing on substituted thiazole derivatives with therapeutic relevance.

The patent's scope spans claims for chemical compounds, their methods of synthesis, and their therapeutic applications. It marked a key milestone in the development of heterocyclic pharmaceuticals, particularly within antimicrobials and anti-inflammatory categories.

The patent landscape around the ‘019 patent includes critical follow-on patents, many of which sought to expand the scope through derivatives, polymorphs, and new therapeutic uses. This analysis covers the patent claims, their legal boundaries, and the strategic implications for innovators and patent holders within this chemical domain.


Summary Table of the ‘019 Patent

Aspect Details
Patent Number 4,027,019
Issue Date June 28, 1977
Assignee Immuno Fine Chemicals Ltd.
Inventors Raymond F. Cook, et al.
Title 1-alkyl-3-(5-mercapto-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl) urea and derivatives
Patent Term 17 years from grant (initially), expired in 1994 (pre-AIA rules)

What Are the Core Claims of U.S. Patent 4,027,019?

1. Chemical Structure Claims

The core claims encompass a broad class of substituted thiazole derivatives, specifically:

  • Claim 1:
    A compound of the formula:

    [ \text{R}_1-\text{NH}-\text{R}_2-\text{NH}_2 ] where R1 is a 1-alkyl group, and R2 is a 5-mercapto-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl group.

  • Claim 2-10:
    Variations describing different possible substitutions on the core heterocyclic ring system, including various alkyl groups, halogen substitutions, and other pharmaceutical derivatives.

2. Method of Synthesis Claims

Claims specify:

  • Methodology for synthesizing the compounds, such as reactions involving thiadiazole derivatives and urea derivatives under specific conditions.
  • The process claims also include purification and crystallization procedures.

3. Therapeutic Uses Claims

Claims extend to methods of treatment, especially targeting bacterial infections by administering the compounds.

  • Claim 15:
    A method of anesthetic or antimicrobial treatment using the compounds.

Scope Summary

The core of the patent is the chemical scope of substituted thiazole compounds and their potential pharmaceutical use, with explicit process claims covering their synthesis.


Patent Landscape and Related Patents

Historical Context

When issued in 1977, the ‘019 patent protected a broad class of heterocyclic compounds, which later became the foundation for various antibiotics, antifungals, and anti-inflammatory agents.

Subsequent Patent Filings and Extensions

  • Follow-on patents (1980s–1990s) covered specific derivatives, including:
    • Polymorphs and salts of the core compounds.
    • New therapeutic indications (e.g., anti-ulcer activity).
    • Methods of formulation and delivery.
Patent Number Title Filing Date Expiry Date Key Features
4,162,315 Thiazole derivatives with antimicrobial activity July 1978 Feb 1995 Focused on specific substituents enhancing activity
4,239,680 Pharmacologically active heterocyclic compounds Nov 1978 Dec 1995 Expanded therapeutic claims

Patentability Trends

  • Patents around this core have often had narrow claims focusing on specific derivatives.
  • Patent offices have been attentive to obviousness issues due to the broad scope of the initial patent.
  • The expiration of the ‘019 patent in 1994 opened the market for generic development.

Legal Status & Litigation

  • No major litigations have challenged the core claims.
  • The patent's expiry led to broader generic manufacturing of similar heterocyclic compounds.

Comparison of Key Claims with Later Patents

Aspect U.S. Patent 4,027,019 Follow-up Patents Differences in Scope
Chemical Core Substituted thiazole derivatives Variants, salts, polymorphs Often narrower, specific derivatives
Synthesis Specific synthetic pathways Alternative methods Broader or more efficient approaches
Therapeutic Use Broad antimicrobials, anti-inflammatories Focused on specific diseases Narrower claims to specific indications

Strategic Implications

  • Patent Expiry Risks:
    The expiration in 1994 cleared the way for generics that could produce chemically similar compounds without infringing on the original patent, although recent patents may have protected related formulations.

  • Patentability of Derivatives:
    Innovators attempting to develop new compounds based on this core must consider patent thickets—narrower patents on specific derivatives or formulations.

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO):
    Post-expiration, FTO analysis must verify the absence of active patents covering particular derivatives, salts, or methods of use.


Deep Dive: Claims Analysis & Patent Strategies

Claim Type Scope Patent Strategy Risks/Challenges
Composition Broad, covering numerous substitution variants Asserted broad coverage, high-value Patent invalidation via obviousness or prior art
Method of Synthesis Specific reactions for derivative production Could be circumvented by alternative synthesis routes Narrow claims reduce enforceability
Therapeutic Use Broad treatment indications May be challenged by narrower, use-specific patents Difficult to enforce for off-label use

Comparison with Similar Classes of Heterocyclic Drugs

Class Typical Patents Key Features Relevance to ‘019 Patent
Thiazole-based antibiotics Well-known, often narrow Focused on specific derivatives Shares chemical backbone
Sulfa drugs Early, broad claims Sulfonamide backbone Similar heterocyclic motif in some derivatives
Fluoroquinolones Later patents, high specificity Fluorinated quinolones Broader scope in antimicrobial class

FAQs

1. What is the significance of the ‘019 patent in pharmaceutical development?
It provided foundational protection for substituted thiazole derivatives, enabling development of antibiotics and anti-inflammatory agents and influencing subsequent heterocyclic drug patents.

2. Are the chemical compounds in the ‘019 patent still under patent protection?
No. The patent expired in 1994, opening the field for generic production.

3. What challenges exist when developing derivatives of the ‘019 patent compounds?
Clear patent barriers are primarily on specific derivatives, salts, or formulations; broad claims of the original patent are no longer enforceable.

4. How does the patent landscape for heterocyclic compounds influence innovation?
Narrower follow-on patents enable incremental innovation but also create patent thickets that complicate freedom to operate.

5. Can new therapeutic uses of the ‘019 compounds be patentable today?
Potentially, if novel, non-obvious, and supported by clinical data, but existing patents and literature must be carefully analyzed.


Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 4,027,019 established broad claims on substituted thiazole derivatives with pharmaceutical applications.
  • Its expiry in 1994 facilitated generic manufacturing but prompted subsequent narrower patents on derivatives and formulations.
  • The patent’s scope influences licensing, R&D strategies, and freedom-to-operate decisions within heterocyclic drug development.
  • Careful patent landscape analysis is essential for new entrants targeting this chemical class, considering both expired patents and ongoing related patent protections.
  • Responsible innovation now relies on navigating narrow, specific patent claims and exploring novel therapeutic indications.

References

[1] U.S. Patent Office, U.S. Patent 4,027,019 (June 28, 1977).
[2] Poole, C.B., et al., "The chemistry of substituted thiazoles," Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry, 1980.
[3] Patent citations and legal status information from USPTO public PAIR system.
[4] Pharmaceutical patent databases, including SureChEMBL and Espacenet.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,027,019

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 4,027,019

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 350748 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria A543976 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 1535776 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 501808 ⤷  Start Trial
Belgium 844350 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 1072948 ⤷  Start Trial
Switzerland 599249 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.