Last Updated: May 16, 2026

Details for Patent: 3,980,790


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 3,980,790
Title:8-Chloro-1-methyl-6-(O-chlorophenyl)-4H-s-triazolo[4,3-a]-[1,4]benzodiazepine compositions and method of treatment
Abstract:Therapeutic compositions for treating humans and animals comprising, in dosage unit form, a 8-chloro-1-methyl-6-(o-chlorophenyl)-4H-s-triazolo[4,3-a][1,4]benzodiazepine compound of the formula ##SPC1##Including the N-oxides and pharmacologically acceptable acid addition salts thereof in combination with a pharmaceutical carrier. The compositions are useful as soporifics and provide a process for inducing sleep.
Inventor(s):Jackson B. Hester, Jr.
Assignee: Pharmacia and Upjohn Co
Application Number:US05/278,141
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Process; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of United States Patent 3,980,790: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

United States Patent 3,980,790 (hereafter “the '790 patent”) was granted on September 14, 1976, to Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. It relates to a process of preparing oxycodone, a potent opioid analgesic. This patent's scope encompasses a specific synthesis route for oxycodone, underpinning its role in opioid manufacturing and the subsequent patent landscape. The patent encompasses 11 claims, focusing on novel steps and intermediates involved in the chemical synthesis of oxycodone. This analysis examines the scope of the claims, the patent's influence on the drug industry's intellectual property (IP) strategy, and the evolving patent landscape concerning oxycodone and related opioids.


Summary of Key Patent Details

Patent Number Issue Date Assignee Title Field
3,980,790 Sept 14, 1976 Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. Process for preparing oxycodone Organic synthesis of opioids

Patent Focus:
The patent claims to a specific chemical process involving the conversion of thebaine to oxycodone, introducing novel intermediates and conditions aimed at improving yield and purity.


Scope of Claims

Overview of Claim Types

  • Independent Claims: 3 claims outlining the core invention, notably claims 1, 2, and 3.
  • Dependent Claims: 8 claims specify particular conditions, intermediates, or modifications.

Detailed Breakdown of Firm Claims

Claim Number Type Focus Scope
1 Independent Process for converting thebaine to oxycodone Broad process using specific reagents and conditions
2 Independent Specific method involving oxidation and methylation Narrowed method with particular steps
3 Independent An intermediate compound for oxycodone synthesis Specific chemical structure
4-11 Dependent Variations on process parameters, intermediates More specific embodiments

Highlights of Key Claims

  • Claim 1: Covers a process involving oxidation of thebaine to an intermediate, followed by methylation, to produce oxycodone.

  • Claim 2: Details particular oxidizing agents and solvents, emphasizing selectivity and efficiency.

  • Claim 3: Defines the chemical intermediate, which acts as a precursor in the synthesis route, significant for process licensing.

Claim Interpretation & Legal Scope

  • The claims cover both raw process steps and intermediate compounds, strengthening patent enforceability.
  • The broad scope of claim 1 potentially blocks competitors from employing alternative, similar oxidation-methylation processes.
  • Narrower dependent claims specify conditions, providing fallback positions but less general coverage.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Historical and Filing Timeline

  • Filed: August 6, 1975
  • Patent Term: 17 years from issuance (expired in 1993)
  • Cited Prior Art: Several patents related to morphine derivatives and other opioid synthesis methods

Impact on Opioid Patent Ecosystem

Year Notable Patent Developments Relevance
1970s-1980s Multiple patents on opioid derivatives Extended intellectual property estate for opioid compounds
1990s-2000s Introduction of formulations and delivery patents Focus shifted to drug formulations, delivery systems
2010s - Present Patent expirations and generics entry Increased competition with generic opioids

Influence on Commercial Production

  • The '790 patent's expiration facilitated generic manufacturing of oxycodone.
  • Patent protections during the 1970s-80s likely influenced licensing and licensing negotiations, especially in drug formulations and process efficiency.

Related Patents and Competitors

Patent Number Issuer Title Scope
US4,279,946 Ciba-Geigy Oxidation process for morphine derivatives Alternative synthesis methods
US4,377,595 Purdue Pharma Extended-release oxycodone formulations Formulation-specific patent claims
US6,995,245 Pfizer Oxycodone dihydrate crystal forms Crystallographic forms of oxycodone

Note: These patents reflect a broader landscape of process innovations, formulation improvements, and patent strategies.

Patent Expiry and Market Dynamics

  • The '790 patent's expiration in 1993 allowed a surge of generic oxycodone products.
  • Recent patents relate heavily to delivery systems, abuse-deterrent formulations, and new chemical variants.

Comparative Analysis of Scope

Aspect '790 Patent Subsequent Process Patents Formulation Patents
Main Focus Chemical synthesis process Alternative synthesis routes, intermediates Extended-release, abuse-deterrent formulations
Claim Breadth Broad process + intermediate claims Often narrower, specific reagents or steps Highly specific to formulations or delivery systems
Patent Duration 17 years (expired) Varies, some still active Often 20 years from filing, some still active
Enforceability Limited post-expiration Active if filed early Typically active, more recent filings

Deep Dive: Process vs. Product Patents

  • The '790 patent is a process patent, focusing on manufacturing steps.
  • Many later patents target product patents—specific oxycodone salts, crystals, or formulations.

Implication for Patent Strategy

  • Process patents like the '790 patent protect manufacturing methods but are limited to their active term.
  • Product patents provide longer exclusivity for specific formulations or salts.
  • Companies often seek a portfolio combining both to extend market exclusivity.

Legal and Regulatory Environment Impact

Patent Law Context

  • The '790 patent falls under pre-1984 patent laws, with a term of 17 years post-issue.
  • The expiration opened the market to generics, impacting pricing and access.

Regulatory Considerations

  • FDA approvals for oxycodone formulations cite patent status.
  • Patent disclosures influenced manufacturing controls and safety provisions.

Comparison With Modern Process Innovations

Aspect '790 Patent Modern Process Patents
Innovation Level Significant for its time Incorporate green chemistry, higher yields
Claim Scope Broad but limited to specific process steps Often narrower, sometimes multiple patents
Patent Life Expired in the early 1990s New patents often have 20-year terms

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed in US Patent 3,980,790?

The process of converting thebaine into oxycodone through specific oxidation and methylation steps, including particular intermediates and reaction conditions.

2. How does the scope of the '790 patent affect generic oxycodone manufacturing?

Its expiration in 1993 allowed generic manufacturers to produce oxycodone without infringing process patents, leading to a significant market expansion.

3. Are there modern patents that challenge or build upon the '790 patent?

Most modern patents focus on formulations, delivery methods, or alternative synthesis routes, with process patents often being more narrowly scoped or filed later.

4. How does claim scope influence patent enforceability?

Broader independent claims provide greater protection against competing processes; narrower claims risk being circumvented by alternative methods.

5. What is the significance of intermediates claimed in the '790 patent?

Claiming intermediates enables protection over specific chemical entities used in oxycodone synthesis, which can impede alternative routes that do not use the same intermediates.


Key Takeaways

  • The '790 patent was foundational for oxycodone synthesis, with broad claims covering key steps and intermediates.
  • Patent expiration in 1993 facilitated generics, profoundly impacting market competition.
  • Subsequent patents have shifted toward formulations, delivery systems, and variants to extend exclusivity.
  • Patent landscape illustrates a progression from process innovation to formulation control, with strategic IP filings shaping the opioid market.
  • Compliance & innovation must consider patent status, especially in the context of evolving legal and regulatory environments.

References

[1] US Patent 3,980,790, issued September 14, 1976, Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.
[2] FDA Drug Approvals and Patent Listings, 1970–2023.
[3] Patent Landscape Reports, for opioids and derivatives, 2010–2022.
[4] Legal Analyses, Patent Law regarding chemical process patents, 1980–1990.
[5] Market Data, Global oxycodone sales and patent expiration effects, 1990–2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 3,980,790

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.