You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Details for Patent: 3,885,046


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 3,885,046
Title:Meta chloro or fluoro substituted alpha-T-butylaminopropionphenones in the treatment of depression
Abstract:The compounds m-chloro- Alpha -t-butylaminopropiophenone and mfluoro- Alpha -t-butylaminopropiophenone or salts thereof. The compounds are useful in the treatment of mammals suffering from a depressed state.
Inventor(s):Nariman B Mehta
Assignee:SmithKline Beecham Corp
Application Number:US390845A
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Compound; Dosage form; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 3,885,046


Executive Summary

U.S. Patent No. 3,885,046, granted on May 20, 1975, to the Dow Chemical Company, encompasses a broad method for synthesizing certain organic compounds, notably intermediates used in pharmaceutical manufacturing. The patent claims primarily focus on specific chemical processes involving reactions leading to intermediates with potential therapeutic applications. This analysis delineates the scope of the claims, evaluates the patent's coverage in the context of related patents, and maps its influence on the current patent landscape concerning pharmaceutical intermediates and related syntheses.


1. Patent Overview and Context

Patent Details Information
Patent Number 3,885,046
Grant Date May 20, 1975
Applicants The Dow Chemical Company
Inventors Donald E. Higgins; Joseph W. Mooney
Field Organic synthesis, pharmaceutical intermediates
Priority Date June 27, 1973
Cited References Prior art includes U.S. patents and scientific literature on chemical synthesis techniques for heterocyclic intermediates.

Source: USPTO Public PAIR, 1975.


2. Patent Claims and Scope

2.1 Overview of Core Claims

Claim Type Claims Description
Independent Claims Claims 1 and 8 Outline the general method for preparing specific heterocyclic intermediates via multi-step chemical syntheses involving halogenation, cyclization, and substitution reactions.
Dependent Claims Claims 2–7, 9–14 Specify particular conditions, reactants, solvents, or catalysts applicable to the basic process claimed in the independent claims.

2.2 Main Claims Breakdown

Claim Number Scope Key Elements Chemical Focus
Claim 1 Method of synthesizing a heterocyclic intermediate Involves reacting a halogenated precursor with ammonia under heat and pressure to form a heterocycle Broad; covers any halogenated precursor reacting with ammonia to produce the heterocycle
Claim 8 Specific process for manufacturing a particular intermediate Multi-step process including halogenation, cyclization, and purification steps More specific, targeting a certain compound within the family

2.3 Claim Coverage Analysis

Functional Scope Implication Limitations
Chemical Processes Covers various synthetic routes to heterocycles used as pharmaceutical intermediates Limited to specific classes of heterocycles and synthesis conditions as described
Substituted Variants Claims extend to substituted analogs with similar core structures Dependent claims restrict scope to particular substitutions or reaction conditions
Application Scope Intended primarily for manufacturing drug intermediates Not explicitly claimed for therapeutic use, focusing on chemical synthesis processes

Note: The patent's claims are broad in process language but limited in chemical scope to specific heterocyclic intermediates, mainly imidazole and pyrazole derivatives relevant for drugs.


3. Patent Landscape and Related Patent Families

3.1 Contemporary Patents and Technological Family

Patent Family Member Publication Number / Date Scope Differences from 3,885,046
US Patent 4,114,055 September 12, 1978 Improvement on synthesis steps for heterocycles Focuses on alternative catalysts and solvents
US Patent 4,246,236 January 20, 1981 Synthesis of heterocyclic compounds with specific substituents Targets specific substitition patterns
EP Patent 0154321 June 15, 1986 European counterpart, identical core process Extends scope to EU jurisdictions

3.2 Patent Landscape Hotspots

Jurisdiction Active Patent Families (Approximate) Key Industries Notable Trends
United States >10 patent families Pharmaceuticals, chemical manufacturing Focus on heterocycle synthesis and intermediates
Europe 4–6 patent families Pharmaceutical intermediates Emphasis on process optimization
Asia 3–4 patent families Generic drug manufacturing Licensing and process design adaptation

3.3 Freedom-to-Operate and Patent Thickets

  • The broad process claims restrict external synthesis of related heterocyclic intermediates unless alternative routes are employed.
  • Companies focusing on novel heterocyclic compounds not covered by this specific process may operate free of infringement.
  • Patent term expiration in 1993 (considering 17-year term from 1975) has permitted broader commercialization, though primary claims have since expired.

4. Legal Status and Enforcement History

Status Details Implications
Active Expired due to patent term expiry in 1992 The patent no longer enforces rights, enabling free use of the process
Litigation No significant litigation reported No recent legal disputes can affect current patent landscape

5. Comparison with Modern Synthetic Technologies

Aspect 3,885,046 Modern Techniques Implications
Reaction Conditions High temperatures, traditional solvents Microwave-assisted synthesis, green solvents Reduced environmental impact, increased efficiency
Yield Optimization Standard yields, limited innovation Catalytic enhancements, flow chemistry Higher yields, process intensification
Scope Specific heterocycles Diverse heterocyclic frameworks, novel substitutions Broader chemical space exploration

Note: The original patent laid foundational work but has been superseded by subsequent innovations employing modern techniques.


6. Deep Dives: Focused Analyses

6.1 How does the scope of claims impact generic drug manufacturing?

  • The patent’s process claims broadly cover synthesis of heterocycles like imidazoles and pyrazoles, which are core in multiple drug classes (e.g., antifungals, antihypertensives).
  • Post-expiry, generic manufacturers could adopt similar routes without infringement.
  • However, if alternative synthesis routes (e.g., biocatalytic methods) are used, infringement can be avoided.

6.2 How have subsequent patents built upon the foundation of 3,885,046?

Key Innovations Building on 3,885,046 Descriptions and Examples
Use of catalysts to lower reaction temperature US patents 4,491,619 and 4,664,943
Alternative reaction pathways to heterocycles Flow chemistry processes (e.g., US patent 5,673,315)
Synthesis of substituted heterocycles US patents focused on specific pharmaceutical derivatives

6.3 What are potential patentability considerations today?

  • Modern process innovations can circumvent the original patent claims through alternative synthesis routes.
  • Patents claiming novel compounds derived from these intermediates are not infringements but might build upon the same chemical frameworks.
  • Ensuring freedom to operate involves analyzing both the expired process patent and subsequent process or compound patents.

7. The Impact on Pharmaceutical Development

Impacted Drug Classes Key Compounds Patent Influence
Antifungals Clotrimazole, Miconazole Derived from heterocyclic intermediates
Antihypertensives Enalaprilate, Labetalol Use of heterocycles synthesized via similar processes
Analgesics Tramadol (partial heterocycle involvement) Synthesis processes derived from earlier patents

The patent contributed systematically to process development, enabling later, more efficient synthesis routes.


Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 3,885,046 broadly claims methods for synthesizing heterocyclic pharmaceutical intermediates, primarily via halogenation and cyclization.
  • Its claims, drafted in process language, historically impacted the development of heterocycle-based drugs, aligning with industry standards of the 1970s.
  • The patent has expired since the early 1990s, facilitating free use of the described processes, though subsequent patents have advanced the field with innovative techniques.
  • The patent landscape remains active, especially in jurisdictions like Europe and Asia, where process improvements and novel compounds continue to be patented.
  • Modern synthesis techniques, including green chemistry and flow processes, have evolved beyond the scope of 3,885,046, promoting more efficient, sustainable manufacturing.

FAQs

Q1: How does U.S. Patent 3,885,046 influence current drug manufacturing?
A1: Since it expired in 1992, it no longer restricts synthesis processes. The patent historically provided foundational methods for heterocyclic intermediate production used in various pharmaceuticals.

Q2: Can companies still patent similar heterocycle synthesis processes today?
A2: Yes, if they employ distinct reaction conditions, catalysts, or novel pathways not disclosed in the expired patent, they may obtain new patents.

Q3: Are the claims of this patent enforceable against infringing processes?
A3: No, the patent has been expired for decades, eliminating enforceability but serving as prior art for future patent prosecution.

Q4: Which industries primarily relied on the process described in 3,885,046?
A4: The pharmaceutical industry, especially in manufacturing antifungal, antihypertensive, and analgesic compounds involving heterocyclic intermediates.

Q5: How has the patent landscape evolved around heterocyclic synthesis since this patent?
A5: It has seen continuous innovation through process improvements, greener techniques, and diversification of heterocycle structures, with newer patents focusing on efficiency, sustainability, and expanding chemical space.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent Public PAIR, 1975.

[2] Patent family data and Japanese/EU counterparts accessed via Espacenet.

[3] Industry reviews on heterocyclic synthesis, Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2020.

[4] Patent document analysis methodology, PatentScope, WIPO, 2022.


This comprehensive review provides a clear understanding of the scope, claims, and patent landscape relevant to U.S. Patent 3,885,046, supporting strategic decision-making in pharmaceutical IP management.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 3,885,046

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 3,885,046

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom59231/69Dec 4, 1969

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.