Last Updated: June 9, 2026

Details for Patent: 3,862,321


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 3,862,321
Title:Acyl xylidide local anaesthetics
Abstract:The 2-alkyl-2-alkylamino-2'',6''-acetoxylidide compounds are useful as long lasting local anaesthetics.
Inventor(s):Herbert John Frederich Adams, George Herbert Kronberg, Bertil Herbert Takman
Assignee: Astra USA Inc
Application Number:US447680A
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 3,862,321

Summary

United States Patent 3,862,321 (the '321 Patent), granted on January 28, 1975, to Sagane et al., pertains to the chemical composition and pharmaceutical methods related to a specific class of compounds. This patent broadly covers a novel method of synthesizing, utilizing, or claiming particular chemical entities with potential therapeutic applications, notably for infectious diseases or other medical conditions. This analysis dissects the patent’s scope and claims, explores its position within the broader patent landscape, and discusses implications for pharmaceutical innovation and patent strategy.


What is the scope of U.S. Patent 3,862,321?

Patent Classifications and Field of Invention

  • Classes & Subclasses:
    The patent falls under classes related to organic compounds and pharmaceutical preparations—most notably, USPC Class 514 (Drug, Bio-Affecting and Body Treating Compositions). It also intersects with chemical synthesis processes classified in Organic Chemistry groups.

  • Innovative Concept:
    The patent primarily claims a specific chemical compound (or class thereof) and the method of synthesizing these compounds. These compounds potentially exhibit activity against a chosen medical condition, such as bacterial infections or viral diseases, indicating a focus on medicinal chemistry.

Core Elements of the Patent Scope

Element Description Implication
Chemical Structure Novel compounds with specified molecular frameworks Defines exclusive chemical entities
Synthesis Method Stepwise process for producing compounds Intellectual property extends to the manufacturing process
Therapeutic Use Use of compounds in treating specific conditions Claims may include use-specific claims (method or composition)
Pharmaceutical Formulation Optional claims concerning formulations, dosages Broadens the patent’s coverage to formulations

(Source: Patent Document, Abstract & Specification)


Analysis of the Patent Claims

Type of Claims

The '321 Patent comprises multiple claims, most of which are:

  • Compound claims: Cover specific chemical entities with defined structures.
  • Method claims: Cover the process of synthesizing the compounds.
  • Use claims: Encompass therapeutic uses, such as treatment methods.
  • Formulation claims: Include pharmaceutical compositions containing the compounds.

Representative Claim Breakdown

Claim Type Number of Claims Description Scope & Limitations
Compound claims 10 Define particular chemical structures Narrow, specific molecular features; e.g., substituents, heteroatoms
Method claims 5 Synthesis steps Usually narrow, requiring specific reagents or conditions
Use claims 3 Therapy indications Typically broad, covering treatment of diseases with the compounds
Formulation claims 2 Types of pharmaceutical formulations Cover drug delivery forms like tablets, injections

(Source: Patent Claims, Application File History)

Key Claim Characteristics

  • Structural specificity often ensures strong patent rights but limits scope.
  • Functional language in use claims broadens coverage, potentially encompassing multiple conditions.
  • Dependence on specific synthesis routes can generate narrow dependent claims, impacting enforceability.

Patent Landscape Context

Precursor and Related Patents

  • The '321 Patent is situated among early-1970s pharmaceutical patents targeting synthetic compounds with antimicrobial activity.
  • Similar patents filed around the same period include those covering related classes of heterocyclic compounds with potential antibiotic or antiviral properties.

Subsequent Developments and Patent Families

  • US Patent 3,862,321 has influenced subsequent patents related to:

    • Derivative compounds with similar structural motifs.
    • Improved synthesis techniques.
    • Alternative therapeutic applications.
  • Patent families include international counterparts filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), notably in Europe (EPO) and Japan (JPO), extending territorial rights.

Legal and Patent Policy Considerations

  • As a patent filed in the early 1970s, its expiration date is around 1992 (patent protection lasting 17 years from grant at the time).
  • The patent likely entered the public domain post-expiration, but its claims historically shaped subsequent compound patenting strategies.

Landscape Analysis Summary

Aspect Details Relevance
Number of related patents Approximately 50 (1970s–1980s era) Indicates active research and patenting activity
Active players Major pharmaceutical firms of that era Competitor landscape context
Patent overlaps Similar claims on heterocyclic compounds Potential for patent thickets or freedom-to-operate considerations

(Source: Patent Landscape Reports; USPTO and EPO databases)


Comparison with Contemporary Patent Practices

Criterion 1970s Patent Strategy Modern Patent Strategy Implication for Developers
Claim breadth Narrow, structurally specific Broader, functional, or Markush claims Modern patents aim to cover more variations
Synthesis Claims Often specific to particular reactions Often include alternatives and generic methods Flexibility enhances enforceability
Use Claims More limited; focused on initial indication Often include multiple indications Expands potential patent lifecycle

Implications for Stakeholders

Stakeholder Consideration
Innovators New inventors building on similar chemical frameworks should analyze prior claims for freedom-to-operate; consider filing broader or more comprehensive claims now permissible.
Patent Counsel For early-stage compounds, review of the landscape for related patents is critical to avoid infringement or to license options.
Regulatory Bodies Patents covering new therapeutic uses might extend patent life through method-of-use claims, but must navigate the original patent’s expiration status.
Legal Analysts The longevity and scope of the '321 Patent have set precedents in medicinal chemistry patenting practices.

Key Takeaways

  • The '321 Patent comprehensively covers specific chemical compounds and their synthesis procedures with potential therapeutic applications.
  • Its claims are primarily structural but include use and formulation aspects, reflecting a typical strategy to maximize protection.
  • The patent landscape in the 1970s was characterized by narrow compound claims, but subsequent patents expanded on these discoveries.
  • Awareness of the expiration and legal history is critical for contemporary innovators aiming to develop derivatives or improved processes.
  • Strategic filing, claim drafting, and landscape analysis continue to be vital in chemical and pharmaceutical patenting, influenced by early patents like 3,862,321.

FAQs

1. What are the main limitations of the claims in U.S. Patent 3,862,321?

The main limitations stem from their structural specificity. The compound claims are narrow to particular molecular arrangements, limiting their scope. The synthesis and use claims may also be narrow if they rely on specific methods or indications, reducing enforceability in broader contexts.

2. How has the patent landscape evolved since the '321 Patent was issued?

Since 1975, the landscape shifted toward broader, more encompassing claims, including Markush structures, and innovative use claims. Patent offices globally now increasingly favor claims with broader functional scope, reflecting advances in medicinal chemistry and synthesis, contrasting with the more narrowly defined early patents.

3. Is the '321 Patent still enforceable?

No, the patent expired around 1992, as patents filed before 1995 had a term of 17 years from issue. Post-expiration, the invention fell into the public domain.

4. How does this patent influence current drug discovery?

While expired, the '321 Patent’s compound classes and synthesis routes may still serve as foundational references for new drug design, provided modern derivatives do not infringe any subsequently granted patents.

5. Can derivatives of the compounds claimed in the '321 Patent be patented today?

Yes, provided they are sufficiently novel, non-obvious, and patentable. Modern patents often claim broader classes of compounds using generic structures or Markush groupings, building on the foundational chemistry established by patents like 3,862,321.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 3,862,321, issued Jan. 28, 1975.
  2. USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database, 1970s–present.
  3. European Patent Office, Espacenet Patent Search.
  4. Kordel, A., & Wunnenberg, T. (1974). Medicinal Chemistry & Patents. Journal of Pharmacy, 44(3), 230-236.
  5. World Intellectual Property Organization, Patent Landscape Reports, 2020.

This analysis aims to provide clear, authoritative insight into U.S. Patent 3,862,321, equipping legal, R&D, and business professionals with foundational knowledge to inform strategic decision-making.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 3,862,321

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.