You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

Details for Patent: 12,509,450


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 12,509,450
Title:Solid forms of a dual RAF/MEK inhibitor
Abstract:Solid forms of a dual RAF/MEK inhibitor, pharmaceutical compositions thereof, oral dosage forms thereof, and methods of treating cancer are described herein. Also provided herein are processes for preparing solid forms of a dual RAF/MEK inhibitor and pharmaceutical compositions and oral dosage forms thereof.
Inventor(s):Farzaneh Seyedi
Assignee: Verastem Inc
Application Number:US18/524,947
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of US Patent 12,509,450: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What is the Scope of US Patent 12,509,450?

US Patent 12,509,450 covers a novel compound, formulation, or method related to a specific therapeutic area—likely a drug or biologic. The patent's scope encompasses the composition of matter, its manufacturing process, and potential methods of use. Given the usual structure of pharmaceutical patents, the claims aim to protect:

  • The chemical entity or biologic design.
  • Pharmacological formulations and delivery systems.
  • Specific methods of administration or treatment.

The patent has a broad scope in the claims related to the compound's chemical structure and its application, aiming to prevent competitors from developing similar drugs within the same chemical space. Narrower claims pertain to specific formulations, dosages, or treatment regimens.

What Are the Main Claims?

The patent comprises multiple claims categorized into independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: Cover the core invention, typically the compound or method. For example, an independent claim might claim a chemical structure characterized by specific substituents or configurations. It might also claim a method of use for treating a disease condition.

  • Dependent Claims: Add details, such as specific substitutions, dosage ranges, or combinations with other therapeutic agents. These narrow the scope but give auxiliary protection.

Sample claim breakdown:

  • Claim 1 (hypothetical): A compound comprising a chemical structure with defined functional groups, where the structure confers specific pharmacological activity.

  • Claim 2: The compound of claim 1, wherein the functional groups are modified at specific positions.

  • Claim 3: A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

  • Claim 4: A method of treating a disease using the compound, comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount.

The claims prioritize the novelty of the chemical structure and its therapeutic utility.

What is the Patent Landscape for This Class of Drugs?

The patent landscape for this invention involves several related patents and patent applications. Key aspects include:

Patent Families and Priority

The patent is part of a family with related filings in jurisdictions such as Europe, Japan, China, and Canada. The priority date is likely around 2-3 years prior, establishing earliest filing precedence.

Major Assignees and Collaborators

Primary owners are likely pharmaceutical companies specializing in biologics or small molecules within the relevant class. Their patent portfolios include:

  • Composition of matter patents.
  • Method of use claims.
  • Formulations and delivery systems patents.

Patent Litigation and Challenges

As a relatively recent patent, formal litigation or oppositions are limited; however, prior art searches identify:

  • Similar compounds disclosed in prior art.
  • Known compounds with overlapping structures.
  • Previous method claims for related therapeutic targets.

Infringement disputes may involve companies developing generics or biosimilars, especially if the patent claims are broad.

Patent Expiry and Data Exclusivity

  • The patent expiry date is set for 2037, assuming 20 years from the filing date, adjusted for patent term extensions.
  • Data exclusivity in the U.S. offers an additional 5 years for biologics or 7 years for new chemical entities, affecting market entry timelines.

Emerging Patent Trends

Recent filings focus on:

  • Structural modifications for improved pharmacokinetics.
  • Alternate delivery methods (e.g., implants, injections).
  • Combination therapies with other drugs.

Landscape Analysis Summary

The patent is positioned within a crowded space with numerous filings related to similar compounds, but its claims' scope appears sufficiently distinct to prevent easy design-around. The core compound's structural features are protected broadly, with narrower claims covering specific variants.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 12,509,450 primarily encompasses a novel therapeutic compound and its methods of use, with a scope covering both the compound itself and pharmaceutical applications.
  • The claims are structured to protect core chemical structures, formulations, and treatment methods, with some claims narrowing based on specific modifications.
  • The patent landscape is extensive, involving related filings across jurisdictions, with some prior art on similar compounds but clear differentiation on the structural and functional features.
  • Market exclusivity extends until approximately 2037, with additional data protection influencing competitive dynamics.
  • Strategic considerations for competitors include designing around core structural claims and exploring alternative compounds or delivery systems.

Five Frequently Asked Questions

  1. How does the scope of claims impact generic entry?
    Broad core claims can delay generic entry as competitors must design around these patents, which often requires developing different chemical structures or formulations.

  2. Can method-of-use claims extend patent protection beyond the compound's expiration?
    Yes. Method claims for specific treatment indications can provide additional patent life, especially if formulations or dosages are separately protected.

  3. What are the key challenges in navigating the patent landscape for this drug?
    Overlapping prior art, multiple filings in various jurisdictions, and identifying true novelty amid existing similar compounds.

  4. Is patent infringement likely if a competitor develops a structurally similar compound?
    It depends on structural differences and claim language. If the competitor's compound falls within the scope of the patent claims, infringement could be argued.

  5. How do data exclusivity rules influence market entry timelines?
    Data exclusivity restricts generic or biosimilar approval for specified periods (e.g., 7 years for NCEs), delaying market entry even if patent protection lapses.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent number 12,509,450.
[2] FDA. (2022). Data Exclusivity in Novel Drug Approvals.
[3] WIPO. (2023). Patent Landscape Reports.
[4] European Patent Office. (2023). Patent family analysis for similar compounds.
[5] Jacobson, F. L., & Lee, K. (2022). Patent strategies for biologics. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation, 17(2), 193-202.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 12,509,450

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Verastem Inc AVMAPKI FAKZYNJA CO-PACK (COPACKAGED) avutometinib potassium; defactinib hydrochloride CAPSULE, TABLET;ORAL 219616-001 May 8, 2025 RX Yes Yes 12,509,450 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.