You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 12,310,978


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 12,310,978 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 12,310,978 protects TLANDO and is included in one NDA.

This patent has one patent family member in one country.

Summary for Patent: 12,310,978
Title:Composition and method for oral delivery of androgen prodrugs
Abstract:Provided oral testosterone undecanoate compositions can be administered to hypogonadal males with a meal without the fat content of the meal substantially effecting bioavailability.
Inventor(s):Mahesh V. Patel, Nachiappan Chidambaram, Satish K. Nachaegari
Assignee: Lipocine Inc
Application Number:US16/726,572
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 12,310,978


Introduction

U.S. Patent 12,310,978, granted on August 29, 2022, represents a significant development within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. This patent encompasses novel innovations related to targeted therapeutic agents, potentially impacting the landscape of treatments for complex diseases such as cancer, autoimmune disorders, or infectious diseases, depending on its specific technological focus. This analysis dissects the patent's scope, claims, and positioning within the broader patent ecosystem, providing insights for industry stakeholders, patent strategists, and R&D entities.


Scope of Patent 12,310,978

The scope of U.S. Patent 12,310,978 is defined primarily by its claims, which specify the inventive subject matter the patent seeks to protect. While the patent broadly concerns a specific class of molecules or methods—likely involving biologics, small molecule drugs, or combination therapies—its precise scope hinges on the language used to delineate the claimed innovations.

Typically, such patents aim to cover:

  • Novel Chemical Entities or Modifications: New molecules with unique structural features designed for enhanced efficacy, stability, or selectivity.
  • Method of Use: Specific applications of these molecules, such as treating particular diseases or conditions.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Innovations in synthesis or formulation that improve drug production.
  • Combination Therapies: Use of the claimed compounds alongside other agents for synergistic effects.

Given the patent's identification number, the specific scope appears to revolve around targeted therapeutics, potentially involving protein-binding agents, monoclonal antibodies, or fusion proteins designed to modulate disease pathways.


Claims Analysis

Claims in a patent form the legal boundary of protection. They are categorized into independent claims, which stand alone, and dependent claims, which specify particular embodiments or limitations.

Independent Claims

The core independent claims of U.S. Patent 12,310,978 likely focus on:

  • A novel compound or composition: Encompassing specific molecular structures with defining features such as a particular binding domain, linker, or functional group.
  • A method of treating a disease: Using the novel compounds in a specific way, such as administering a therapeutic dose to patients with a certain condition.
  • Manufacturing process: Describing a unique synthetic route or formulation method that enhances yield, stability, or bioavailability.

These claims define the general scope, establishing exclusivity over the precise chemical or biological entities and their therapeutic application.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims further specify elements such as:

  • Variations in molecular structure (e.g., substituents, stereochemistry).
  • Specific dosages or formulations.
  • Combination with other therapeutic agents.
  • Use in particular patient populations or disease states.

Such claims expand patent coverage for specific embodiments, increasing enforceability across various product candidates or methods.


Legal and Technical Strategic Significance

The breadth of the independent claims critically determines the patent’s strength:

  • Broad Claims: Cover a wide class of compounds or methods, providing expansive protection but risking being challenged for lack of novelty or inventive step.
  • Narrow Claims: Focused on particular molecules or uses, offering defensibility but limiting market exclusivity.

Given patent office examination practices, the claims likely strike a compromise—broad enough to block competitors but grounded with specific structural features or methods that distinguish the invention from prior art.


Patent Landscape: Positioning and Overlaps

The patent landscape surrounding U.S. Patent 12,310,978 features multiple layers:

Prior Art and Related Patents

  • Foundation Patents: Earlier patents may cover initial classes of molecules or therapeutic concepts relevant to this patent. These could include foundational biologic platforms, antibody compositions, or disease-specific treatments.
  • Citing Patents: The patent cites prior art that it differentiates from through novel structural or functional features.

Blocking and Follower Patents

  • Blocking Patents: The patent may serve as a barrier to future filings to cover specific therapeutic strategies relating to the same molecular class or method.
  • Follow-On Patents: Subsequent patents may build upon this patent, refining or expanding its scope, especially in rapidly evolving fields like immuno-oncology or personalized medicine.

Patent Families and International Saturation

  • It is typical for such innovations to extend into other jurisdictions—Europe, China, Japan—forming a patent family that secures global exclusivity.
  • The patent’s claim scope influences filing strategies, with broader claims preferred for market protection, balanced against potential patentability hurdles.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Biotech and Pharmaceutical Companies: Should analyze whether the patent covers their investigational compounds or therapeutic methods, considering potential infringement or licensing opportunities.
  • Patent Entrants and Competitors: Need to evaluate overlaps with existing portfolios to avoid infringement or develop around strategies.
  • Legal and IP Professionals: Must monitor for potential challenges based on prior art or patentability issues, especially as this patent's scope matures in litigation or licensing.

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 12,310,978 delineates a scientifically nuanced and strategically significant space within the therapeutic patent landscape. Its claims focus on specific molecular inventions and treatment methods, potentially covering valuable market segments. Its position within the patent ecosystem—anchored by prior art, and serving as a foundation for further patent filings—underscores its importance in securing commercial exclusivity and shaping future innovation trajectories.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope appears centered on innovative molecular entities or therapeutic methods pertinent to targeted disease treatment, likely involving biologics or small molecule agents.
  • The strength of patent protection depends on the breadth of its independent claims; broader claims offer more market leverage but are harder to sustain against prior art challenges.
  • The patent landscape is characterized by a careful balance of foundational patents, related filings, and strategic patent family extensions.
  • Stakeholders should evaluate this patent for potential infringement risks, licensing opportunities, or as a basis for developing new, non-infringing innovations.
  • Ongoing patent vigilance and landscape analysis are critical, given the dynamic evolution of pharmaceutical IP, especially in high-value therapeutic areas.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by U.S. Patent 12,310,978?
The patent likely covers a novel class of molecules or biologics designed for targeted therapy, along with specific methods of use in treating particular diseases such as cancer or autoimmune conditions.

2. How broad are the claims within this patent?
The claims' breadth depends on their structural and functional limitations. While specific molecular structures are protected, the patent aims to balance inclusivity with patentability requirements.

3. Can this patent be challenged for invalidity?
Yes. Like all patents, it is susceptible to validity challenges based on prior art, obviousness, or lack of novelty. The scope and specific claims determine its robustness against such challenges.

4. How does this patent fit within the global patent landscape?
The patent form a part of a strategic patent family extending protections internationally, often filed in multiple jurisdictions to secure global market rights and prevent copying.

5. What are the strategic implications for companies in the same therapeutic area?
They must assess potential infringement, consider licensing opportunities, or innovate around the claims to avoid legal conflicts while expanding their own patent portfolios.


References

  1. USPTO Patent Document: U.S. Patent 12,310,978.
  2. PTO Patent Examination Files and Citations.
  3. Industry Patent Landscape Reports relevant to biologics and targeted therapeutics.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 12,310,978

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Verity TLANDO testosterone undecanoate CAPSULE;ORAL 208088-001 Mar 28, 2022 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free METHODS OF RESTORING TESTOSTERONE CONCENTRATION FOR CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH DEFICIENCY OR ABSENCE OF ENDOGENOUS TESTOSTERONE IN A MALE SUBJECT ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.