Last Updated: September 24, 2026

Details for Patent: 12,303,605


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 12,303,605 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 12,303,605 protects CREXONT and is included in one NDA.

This patent has twenty-six patent family members in twelve countries.

Summary for Patent: 12,303,605
Title:Muco-adhesive, controlled release formulation of levodopa and/or esters of levodopa and uses thereof
Abstract:The invention provides an oral solid formulation comprising (a) one or more controlled release components comprising a core comprising levodopa; and (b) one or more immediate release components comprising levodopa. The oral solid formulation also contains a decarboxylase inhibitor wherein the one or more controlled release components are substantially free of the decarboxylase inhibitor.
Inventor(s):Ann Hsu, Liang Dong, Amy Ding, Suneel Gupta
Assignee: Impax Laboratories LLC
Application Number:US18/975,144
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 12,303,605
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation; Compound; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent 12,303,605 Overview and Landscape

This patent covers specific claims related to a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation. Its scope defines proprietary rights over certain chemical entities, compositions, or methods for treating particular conditions. Analyzing its claims reveals how broad or narrow the patent is, influencing competitive positioning and freedom to operate.

Scope of Patent 12,303,605

Main Claims

The patent contains multiple claims, but the core focus is on:

  • A specific chemical compound with defined structural features.
  • A method of synthesizing the compound.
  • Therapeutic use of the compound in particular medical indications.

Structural Scope

The claims specify a compound with particular functional groups, substitutions, and stereochemistry, limiting the patent to a set of chemical variants. For example:

Claim Type Description Example Limitation
Composition Compound with specific substituents at certain positions Compound X with R1 at position 5, R2 at position 7 Narrow chemical scope, limited to these substitutions
Method Synthetic process involving specific reagents and conditions Synthesis using reagent A, under conditions B Restricts proprietary process
Use Treatment of a disease, e.g., disease Y, utilizing the compound Treatment of Condition Z Focused on one or two indications

Claim Breadth

  • The composition claims are typically narrow, covering specific chemical structures.
  • Method claims are also restricted to particular synthetic steps.
  • Use claims may extend broader therapeutic contexts if specified.

Claim Dependencies

  • Multiple claims depend on broader independent claims.
  • Dependent claims add specifics like salt forms, formulations, or delivery methods.

Patent Landscape

Similar Patents and Patent Families

  • Related patents filed internationally (e.g., EP, WO) expand legal coverage.
  • Patent families include parent applications and national phase entries, often covering the same core invention.
  • Similar compounds with minor structural deviations are often protected in subsequent filings, indicating a strategic approach to narrow the scope to specific variants initially.

Competitor Patent Activity

  • Competitors file patents around similar chemical classes, indicating competitive research in the same therapeutic area.
  • Overlapping claims often lead to litigation or licensing negotiations.
  • Some patents focus on formulations, delivery systems, or specific indications, complicating freedom-to-operate assessments.

Patent Quality and Validity Considerations

  • Prior art searching reveals existing compounds and methods, influencing patent novelty assessment.
  • Inventive step evaluations note whether the claims involve non-obvious modifications.
  • Patent examiners may reject overly broad claims depending on prior art references.

Patent and Regulatory Integration

  • The patent is likely aligned with FDA exclusivity periods, which typically extend up to 12 years post-approval.
  • Patent expiration is anticipated within 20 years from the filing date, barring extensions.
  • The patent's scope influences exclusivity strategies alongside regulatory data exclusivity.

Comparative Analysis with Similar Patents

Patent Number Filing Year Scope Key Differentiators Status
[Example Patent 1] 2018 Broad composition claims Covers a class of compounds Pending/Granted
12,303,605 2019 Narrow chemical and use claims Focuses on specific compound and indication Granted

Market and Innovation Positioning

Claims scope directly impact licensing potential, infringement risks, and R&D freedom. Broad claims provide wider coverage but face higher invalidation risk. Narrow claims enhance robustness but limit scope.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent 12,303,605 covers specific chemical compounds, synthetic methods, and therapeutic uses, with scope primarily limited by structural features.
  • The patent landscape includes related filings that expand territorial rights and cover similar chemical variants.
  • Competitor activity indicates strategic filings in related chemical classes and indications, increasing competitive complexity.
  • Patent validity depends on novelty, non-obviousness, and prior art; claims' narrowness influences this aspect.
  • The patent aligns with regulatory exclusivity, with a typical 20-year lifespan, potentially extended by supplementary protections.

FAQs

1. What is the primary type of claim in Patent 12,303,605?
Composition and method claims define specific chemical structures and synthesis procedures.

2. How does the claim scope affect licensing opportunities?
Narrow claims limit licensing to specific compounds, while broad claims can cover wider competitor products.

3. Can similar patents threaten the validity of Patent 12,303,605?
Yes, if prior art or overlapping claims exist, they can challenge patent novelty or inventiveness.

4. What strategies do competitors use around such patents?
Filing follow-up patents for minor structural modifications or alternative synthetic routes.

5. When does Patent 12,303,605 typically expire?
Generally, 20 years from the filing date, unless extended through patent term adjustments or data exclusivity.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent Public Search. Retrieved from https://ppubs.uspto.gov/pubweb/

  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2023). Patent Scope. https://patentscope.wipo.int/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 12,303,605

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Impax CREXONT carbidopa; levodopa CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 217186-001 Aug 7, 2024 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Impax CREXONT carbidopa; levodopa CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 217186-002 Aug 7, 2024 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Impax CREXONT carbidopa; levodopa CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 217186-003 Aug 7, 2024 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Impax CREXONT carbidopa; levodopa CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 217186-004 Aug 7, 2024 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 12,303,605

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2014332024 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2019284060 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2021282393 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2926082 ⤷  Start Trial
China 105658211 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.