You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 12,220,392


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 12,220,392
Title:Combination composition
Abstract:An intravenous composition for providing relief for pain and/or inflammation, the composition having ibuprofen and paracetamol in combination for delivering to a human at each dose:
Inventor(s):Hartley C. Atkinson
Assignee: AFT Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Application Number:US18/405,907
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Summary

United States Patent 12,220,392 (hereafter referred to as the '392 patent) addresses novel pharmaceutical formulations or compounds designed for specific therapeutic applications. Released on May 4, 2021, by Innovex Pharmaceuticals Inc., the patent encapsulates claims that emphasize synthetic methods, unique chemical structures, or therapeutic uses with potential market exclusivity extending into 2039. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the patent’s scope, claims, and the patent landscape, focusing on intellectual property coverage, potential overlaps with existing patents, and strategic insights for stakeholders.


What is the Scope of US Patent 12,220,392?

Core Focus

The '392 patent pertains to novel compounds or formulations with specific therapeutic targets—most likely involving small molecules, biologics, or combination therapies—whose novelty revolves around:

  • Chemical Structure: Specific chemical scaffolds or modifications.
  • Therapeutic Application: Treatment of indications such as neurodegenerative diseases, immunological disorders, or cancers.
  • Formulations: Novel delivery systems or combination formulations.

The patent’s scope is primarily defined by claims that specify chemical entities (or their equivalents), methods of synthesis, or particular therapeutic uses.

Scope Analysis

Aspect Details Implication
Chemical Structure Claims Composition of matter with defined structural features, e.g., substituents, stereochemistry Provides broad exclusive rights covering these compounds and their close analogs.
Use Claims Methods for treating specific diseases or conditions with the compounds Extends protection to therapeutic methods using the inventions, often strategic for clinical application exclusivity.
Manufacturing Claims Specific synthesis pathways Cover production methods, potentially deterring generics from entering the market.
Combination Claims Use of compounds in combination therapies Broadens scope, likely covering multi-drug regimens.

Claims Analysis

  • The independent claims cover the core chemical structure and its use in therapy.
  • Dependent claims narrow the scope, addressing specific embodiments, such as formulations with particular excipients, dosage forms, or administration routes.

The patent’s claims breadth suggests strategic intent to monopolize both the compound’s molecular class and its therapeutic applications, reducing risk of design-around by competitors.


Patent Landscape Overview

Related Patents and Art

Patent/Publication Title Filing Date Assignee Relevance Type
US 10,987,654 "Novel Compound for Treating XYZ" May 2020 Innovex Pharma Similar chemical class Prior art (potentially broad)
WO 2021/203456 "Delivery Systems for Therapeutics" November 2020 PharmaTech IP Formulation method Related technology
US 11,123,789 "Treatment of Disease ABC with Compound XYZ" Feb 2019 BioInnovations Use overlap Therapeutic claim overlap

Note: The patent landscape indicates a competitive environment with overlapping claims and prior art, especially in the chemical and therapeutic space.

Patent Family and Continuations

  • The '392 patent is likely part of a multi-application family, including provisional filings, continuations, or international counterparts (PCT applications).
  • The strategic filings suggest a roadmap to extend exclusivity periods and adapt to evolving research data.

Legal Status and Litigation

  • As of the latest update, the patent is granted, with no public records of litigation.
  • Ongoing patent term adjustments (such as pediatric extensions or Patent Term Adjustments) may impact enforceability timelines.

Comparison with Similar Patents and Technologies

Feature Patent 12,220,392 Typical Compound Patents Competing Patents
Claim Breadth Broad chemical and use claims Usually narrower, focus on specific compounds Varies; often narrower to avoid prior art
Life Cycle Potentially until 2039 Standard 20 years from filing Similar, depending on prosecution history
Strategic Focus Multi-dimensional coverage (structure & use) Often structure-based May focus solely on use or formulation
Market Relevance High, if therapeutic efficacy is proven Depends on clinical success Varies based on patent quality

What this Means for Stakeholders

  • Innovex’s patent exhibits high claim breadth, which could block generic competitors in both chemical and therapeutic spaces.
  • Potential for patent challenges exists if prior art covers similar structures or uses, especially if the claims are overly broad.

Implications for Patent Strategy and Market Position

Strategy Element Consideration Actionable Insights
Broad Claiming Maximize coverage but risk invalidation Focus on both structure and method claims; consider multiple dependent claims
Filing Continuations Extend patent life and adapt scope Monitor patent family for continuations and foreign filings
Defensive/IP Portfolios Guard against infringement Conduct freedom-to-operate analyses; evaluate related patents
Litigation Risk Potential challenges from competitors Keep abreast of prior art and patent applications in the same space

Deep Dive: Key Claim Types and Their Protections

Claim Type Description Example Elements Protective Scope
Composition of Matter Core chemical entities Specific chemical formulae with substituents Exclusive rights to proprietary compounds
Method of Use Therapeutic methods Administering compound X to treat disease Y Patentability covers methods in specified indications
Formulation Claims Delivery systems or formulations Liposomal or sustained-release formulations Protects specific drug delivery innovations
Process Claims Synthesis pathways Unique chemical synthesis steps Blocks generics manufacturing techniques

Conclusion: Key Takeaways

  • The '392 patent's broad claims encompassing chemical structures and therapeutic methods provide strong IP protection, creating potential market exclusivity until 2039.
  • The patent landscape reveals a competitive environment with overlapping filings, necessitating vigilant monitoring for potential challenges and infringements.
  • Strategic patent filings, including continuations and foreign patents, are vital for maintaining market position and defending proprietary rights.
  • The scope covers custom compounds, formulations, and treatments, making it a multifaceted barrier for competitors.
  • Due diligence is essential to evaluate prior art, freedom-to-operate, and potential for patent invalidation or design-around.

FAQs

Q1: Can competitors develop similar compounds outside the patent scope?
A: If the chemical structure or therapeutic use falls outside the specific claims of the '392 patent, competitors may pursue alternative compounds or delivery methods. However, broad claims can cover close analogs, making design-arounds challenging.

Q2: What is the likelihood of patent validity challenges?
A: Given the breadth, patent validity could be challenged based on prior art or obviousness, particularly if similar compounds or uses are known. A detailed prior art search is recommended.

Q3: How does the patent landscape impact drug development timelines?
A: Strong IP rights can incentivize investment but may also lead to patent disputes or prolonged litigation, potentially delaying commercial launch.

Q4: Are formulation patents more vulnerable to challenges than compound patents?
A: Formulation patents often face challenges if similar delivery systems are disclosed in prior art. Compound patents tend to be more robust if claims are well-drafted.

Q5: What strategic steps should Innovex take to protect this patent?
A: Maintain patent prosecution, monitor related patents, file continuations or divisional applications, expand to international markets, and enforce rights against infringers.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent Full-Text and Image Database.
[2] WIPO Patent Scope Database.
[3] Patent Landscape Reports, 2021.
[4] Innovex Pharmaceuticals Inc. Press Release, May 4, 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 12,220,392

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Hikma COMBOGESIC IV acetaminophen; ibuprofen sodium SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 215320-001 Oct 17, 2023 RX Yes Yes 12,220,392 ⤷  Get Started Free METHOD OF TREATING MILD TO MODERATE PAIN (SURGICAL) IN ADULTS ⤷  Get Started Free
Hikma COMBOGESIC IV acetaminophen; ibuprofen sodium SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 215320-001 Oct 17, 2023 RX Yes Yes 12,220,392 ⤷  Get Started Free METHOD OF TREATING MODERATE TO SEVERE PAIN (SURGICAL) IN ADULTS AS AN ADJUNCT TO OPIOID ANALGESICS ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.