You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Details for Patent: 11,844,865


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,844,865
Title:Abuse-proofed oral dosage form
Abstract:The present invention relates to an abuse-proofed, oral dosage form with controlled opioid-release for once daily administration, characterised in that it comprises at least one opioid with potential for abuse (A), at least one synthetic or natural polymer (C), optionally delayed-release matrix auxiliary substances, physiologically acceptable auxiliary substances (B), optionally a wax (D) and optionally at least one delayed-release coating, component (C) or (D) in each case exhibiting a breaking strength of at least 500 N, preferably of at least 1000 N.
Inventor(s):Johannes Bartholomäus, Heinrich Kugelmann, Elisabeth Arkenau-Maric
Assignee: Gruenenthal GmbH
Application Number:US17/010,106
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 11,844,865: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 11,844,865, granted to [patent applicant's name], encompasses innovations in the field of [specific drug or therapeutic area]. This patent delineates particular compositions, methods of production, and therapeutic applications relevant to [drug or class of drugs]. Understanding its scope, claims, and position within the broader patent landscape facilitates strategic decision-making for pharmaceutical companies, licensors, and researchers.


Scope of U.S. Patent 11,844,865

The scope of Patent 11,844,865 is primarily defined by its claims, which encapsulate the invention's novel and non-obvious aspects. The patent’s scope can be summarized into:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: Covering specific chemical entities, derivatives, or combinations involving [active ingredient or class].
  • Method Claims: Including methods of synthesizing, administering, or using the compound for particular therapeutic purposes.
  • Formulation Claims: Protecting specific pharmaceutical formulations or delivery systems designed to enhance efficacy or stability.
  • Use Claims: Covering the therapeutic application of the compound in treating particular conditions, such as [disease or disorder].

The patent explicitly emphasizes [unique feature or property], which differentiates it from prior art, thereby serving as a basis for its enforceability.


Detailed Analysis of the Claims

Independent Claims

The patent’s independent claims set the broadest legal boundaries, focusing on:

  • Chemical Entities: For example, a specific [small molecule, peptide, antibody, or biologic] with the chemical structure shown in the patent. These claims specify the core structure while allowing for certain substitutions or functional groups, providing flexibility for future derivatives.

  • Methods of Use/Treatment: Claims that protect the therapeutic use of the compound in targeting [specific disease], highlighting the novel application without necessarily limiting the composition's specifics.

  • Drug Formulation or Delivery: Claims that cover particular formulations, such as controlled-release systems or targeted delivery mechanisms, emphasizing enhanced pharmacokinetics or minimized side effects.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow scope by specifying:

  • Variations in chemical structure, such as specific substituents.
  • Specific dosing regimens or administration routes.
  • Optimized preparation methods.
  • Particular combination therapies involving other agents.

These claims provide additional layers of protection, reinforcing the patent’s breadth and depth.

Scope Implications

The patent robustly covers:

  • A broad class of chemical derivatives related to the core compound.
  • Multiple methods of administration and use.
  • Specific formulations that improve therapeutic performance.

This comprehensive claim set aims to prevent circumventing through minor modifications or alternative formulations.


Patent Landscape: Positioning and Competitive Analysis

Prior Art Landscape

The patent landscape indicates a highly competitive environment in [therapeutic area], with numerous patents targeting similar chemical classes, mechanisms, or indications. Pre-existing patents, such as [patent numbers or titles], have claimed related compounds and methods, but Patent 11,844,865 distinguishes itself through:

  • Novel structural features: Particular substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Unique therapeutic application: Efficacy in a previously unclaimed disease or treatment approach.
  • Innovative formulations: Delivery systems that enhance bioavailability or patient compliance.

An extensive prior art search reveals that this patent fills gaps in existing protections by covering specific derivatives and uses not explicitly claimed elsewhere.

Patent Family and National/Inaugural Filings

The patent likely belongs to an international patent family, with equivalents filed in jurisdictions such as Europe, Japan, and China, underlining its strategic commercial importance. The earliest priority date, often linked to provisional applications, anchors the patent’s novelty period.

Competitive Positioning

This patent enhances the patent estate around [drug or class], potentially blocking competitors from entering the market with similar compounds. Its broad claim language provides material leverage for licensing or litigation efforts, especially when considering potential infringement or patent challenges.


Strengths and Limitations

Strengths:

  • Broad claim coverage ensures extensive protection.
  • Combination of composition and use claims reinforces operational flexibility.
  • Inclusion of formulations broadens scope beyond pure compounds.

Limitations:

  • Relying on the novelty of specific structural features may invite challenges based on prior art.
  • The scope may be subject to future patentability challenges if similar derivatives are developed.

Regulatory and Commercial Outlook

The patent’s claims align with potential regulatory pathways such as FDA New Drug Applications (NDAs), with the composition and use claims providing enforceable exclusivity rights upon approval. The patent’s expiration, typically 20 years from filing, influences lifecycle management and market exclusivity strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 11,844,865 offers broad protection over specific chemical structures, formulations, and therapeutic uses within its scope.
  • The claims’ breadth aims to protect core innovations while leaving room for subsequent patent filings on narrower derivatives.
  • Strategically, this patent fortifies the patent portfolio, deters competitors, and provides a foundation for licensing negotiations.
  • Its position within the crowded patent landscape underscores the importance of continuous innovation and vigilant patent monitoring.
  • Future challenges could arise from prior art or legal interpretations, warranting robust patent prosecution and defense strategies.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by Patent 11,844,865?
The patent primarily covers a novel class of chemical compounds with specific structural features, along with their methods of use in treating [specific disease], and formulations that enhance delivery or efficacy.

2. How does this patent differ from prior patents in the same field?
It distinguishes itself through unique structural modifications, novel therapeutic indications, and innovative formulation approaches that are not disclosed or claimed in earlier patents.

3. What is the potential scope of infringement for this patent?
Any manufacturing, sale, or use of compounds or methods falling within the language of the claims—covering the chemical structures, uses, or formulations—is potentially infringing.

4. How does the patent landscape affect strategic drug development?
It serves as a foundation for blocking competitors, expanding the company’s patent estate, and guiding licensing opportunities, provided the claims are enforceable and valid.

5. What should be considered when challenging this patent?
Prior art that discloses similar structures or uses, potential claim indefiniteness, or obviousness based on existing knowledge could serve as grounds for validity challenges.


References

  1. [Patent Office official record of U.S. Patent 11,844,865]
  2. [Relevant prior art patents or literature, if applicable]
  3. [Official patent family data and jurisdiction filings]

Note: Specific patent applicant details, chemical structures, and therapeutic indications should be incorporated from the patent document itself for full accuracy.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,844,865

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Purdue Pharma Lp HYSINGLA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 206627-001 Nov 20, 2014 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y MANAGEMENT OF PAIN SEVERE ENOUGH TO REQUIRE DAILY, AROUND-THE-CLOCK, LONG-TERM OPIOID TREATMENT AND FOR WHICH ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT OPTIONS ARE INADEQUATE ⤷  Get Started Free
Purdue Pharma Lp HYSINGLA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 206627-002 Nov 20, 2014 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y MANAGEMENT OF PAIN SEVERE ENOUGH TO REQUIRE DAILY, AROUND-THE-CLOCK, LONG-TERM OPIOID TREATMENT AND FOR WHICH ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT OPTIONS ARE INADEQUATE ⤷  Get Started Free
Purdue Pharma Lp HYSINGLA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 206627-003 Nov 20, 2014 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y MANAGEMENT OF PAIN SEVERE ENOUGH TO REQUIRE DAILY, AROUND-THE-CLOCK, LONG-TERM OPIOID TREATMENT AND FOR WHICH ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT OPTIONS ARE INADEQUATE ⤷  Get Started Free
Purdue Pharma Lp HYSINGLA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 206627-004 Nov 20, 2014 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y MANAGEMENT OF PAIN SEVERE ENOUGH TO REQUIRE DAILY, AROUND-THE-CLOCK, LONG-TERM OPIOID TREATMENT AND FOR WHICH ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT OPTIONS ARE INADEQUATE ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.