Last Updated: June 24, 2026

HYSINGLA ER Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Hysingla Er patents expire, and when can generic versions of Hysingla Er launch?

Hysingla Er is a drug marketed by Purdue Pharma Lp and is included in one NDA. There are nineteen patents protecting this drug and two Paragraph IV challenges.

This drug has two hundred and ninety-five patent family members in forty-eight countries.

The generic ingredient in HYSINGLA ER is hydrocodone bitartrate. There are twenty-three drug master file entries for this compound. Two suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the hydrocodone bitartrate profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Hysingla Er

A generic version of HYSINGLA ER was approved as hydrocodone bitartrate by ALVOGEN on January 21st, 2020.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for HYSINGLA ER?
  • What are the global sales for HYSINGLA ER?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for HYSINGLA ER?
Pharmacology for HYSINGLA ER
Drug ClassOpioid Agonist
Mechanism of ActionOpioid Agonists
Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for HYSINGLA ER
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
HYSINGLA ER Extended-release Tablets hydrocodone bitartrate 30 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg, and 100 mg 206627 1 2015-05-08
HYSINGLA ER Extended-release Tablets hydrocodone bitartrate 20 mg, 60 mg, and 120 mg 206627 1 2015-04-15

US Patents and Regulatory Information for HYSINGLA ER

HYSINGLA ER is protected by nineteen US patents.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Purdue Pharma Lp HYSINGLA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 206627-004 Nov 20, 2014 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Purdue Pharma Lp HYSINGLA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 206627-006 Nov 20, 2014 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Purdue Pharma Lp HYSINGLA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 206627-003 Nov 20, 2014 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Purdue Pharma Lp HYSINGLA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 206627-002 Nov 20, 2014 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Purdue Pharma Lp HYSINGLA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 206627-005 Nov 20, 2014 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Purdue Pharma Lp HYSINGLA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 206627-006 Nov 20, 2014 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for HYSINGLA ER

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Purdue Pharma Lp HYSINGLA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 206627-007 Nov 20, 2014 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Purdue Pharma Lp HYSINGLA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 206627-007 Nov 20, 2014 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Purdue Pharma Lp HYSINGLA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 206627-005 Nov 20, 2014 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Purdue Pharma Lp HYSINGLA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 206627-005 Nov 20, 2014 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Purdue Pharma Lp HYSINGLA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 206627-007 Nov 20, 2014 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Purdue Pharma Lp HYSINGLA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 206627-007 Nov 20, 2014 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

International Patents for HYSINGLA ER

See the table below for patents covering HYSINGLA ER around the world.

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
Argentina 045352 FORMA DE DOSIFICACION A PRUEBA DE ABUSO ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 045353 FORMA DE DOSIFICACION A PRUEBA DE ABUSO ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 046994 PROCESO PARA LA PRODUCCION DE UNA FORMA DE DOSIFICACION A PRUEBA DE ABUSO ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 049083 PROCESO PARA LA PREPARACION DE UNA FORMA DE DOSIFICACION SOLIDA A PRUEBA DE ABUSO ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 049839 PROCEDIMIENTO PARA LA PRODUCCION DEUNA FORMA FARMACEUTICA SOLIDA, PROTEGIDA FRENTE AL ABUSO ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 054328 FORMAS FARMACEUTICAS RESISTENTES A LA ROTURA CON LIBERACION SOSTENIDA ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

Hysingla ER (Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release) Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory: Sales, Competition, and Patent-Driven Generic Risk

Last updated: June 8, 2026

Hysingla ER (hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release; Acura Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) is an opioid analgesic with a concentrated commercial footprint tied to long-acting opioid prescribing, payer scrutiny, and ongoing opioid-supply chain restructuring. Its financial trajectory is shaped by (1) baseline demand for ER hydrocodone in chronic pain, (2) competitive pressure from other long-acting hydrocodone and ER opioids, (3) FDA controlled substance oversight and REMS-adjacent payer controls, and (4) patent and exclusivity runoffs that can enable generic entry in later years.

How is Hysingla ER performing commercially (sales trend, revenue drivers, and market size)?

Hysingla ER’s commercial performance is best understood through three demand drivers and one structural headwind:

  • Demand drivers

    • Long-acting opioid (LAO) conversion: patients stabilized on LAO regimens maintain therapy unless safety signals, formulary changes, or switching incentives intervene.
    • Chronic pain prescribing patterns: ER hydrocodone competes within the broader LAO class that is sensitive to guidelines, state prescribing regimes, and CDC-linked payer restrictions.
    • Formulary placement and access: payer step therapy and prior authorization can shift net revenue more than unit volume.
  • Structural headwinds

    • Opioid contracting and mitigation strategies: health plans and pharmacy benefit managers have used tighter controls (PA, quantity limits, tiering) across long-acting products.
    • Net price compression: branded opioid pricing is volatile and often subject to rebates, wholesaler chargebacks, and dynamic payer contracting.
    • Substitution risk inside the LAO category: competitors with favorable payer positioning can displace Hysingla ER even before direct generic competition.

What revenue mix does Hysingla ER rely on (net sales composition and reimbursement mechanics)?

Net sales for branded opioid ER products typically correlate with:

  • Contracting intensity with PBMs and integrated delivery networks.
  • State Medicaid formularies and managed Medicaid plan behavior.
  • Trend toward opioid alternatives and non-opioid adjuncts in higher-acuity chronic pain populations.

What competitive landscape pressures Hysingla ER (other ER hydrocodone products and LA opioid rivals)?

Hysingla ER competes in at least two layers:

  1. Direct ER hydrocodone peers
    • Other ER hydrocodone formulations (including variants across manufacturers) compete on dosage strengths, abuse-deterrent profile, and payer preference.
  2. Indirect LAO substitutes
    • ER oxycodone, ER morphine, ER oxymorphone, and other LAO classes compete via formulary equivalency and clinical-switch protocols.

How does abuse-deterrent and ER technology affect switching behavior?

Within LA opioids, formulary teams and prescribers weigh abuse-deterrent technologies and safety labeling constraints when selecting products for chronic patients. Even when a rival has similar pharmacokinetics, formulary adoption often follows payer risk scoring and utilization management outcomes.

Which competitors typically move faster during formulary changes?

Competition accelerates when:

  • A rival has stronger payer placement in commercial and Medicaid formularies.
  • A competitor has broader dosage coverage that aligns with patient titration.
  • A competitor is positioned as lower total-cost-of-care under opioid contracting frameworks.

When do Hysingla ER patents and exclusivity end, and how does that affect generic entry timing?

Hysingla ER’s transition risk is governed by the intersection of:

  • Orange Book-listed patents for active ingredient, formulation, and method-of-use.
  • Regulatory exclusivity (drug product and approved application exclusivity, plus any pediatric exclusivity if triggered).
  • Filing strategy by generics under ANDA Paragraph IV (if challengers target expiring listed patents).

What is the Orange Book status of Hysingla ER?

The Orange Book status must be assessed product-specific by NDA listing and listed patent families for hydrocodone bitartrate ER tablets. The practical outcome for financial trajectory is generic availability on specific strengths and dosage forms.

What patents protect Hysingla ER (formulation, method-of-use, and manufacturing)?

Patent estates for LA opioids typically include:

  • Composition/formulation (including release-rate control and excipient systems).
  • Methods of treatment (population-specific dosing and clinical use).
  • Manufacturing and process claims tied to ER performance.

Financial impact follows claim strength and the probability that Paragraph IV challenges clear injunction risk or settlement terms.

What patent litigation and Paragraph IV challenges affect Hysingla ER exclusivity?

Generic risk materializes when either:

  • A Paragraph IV ANDA is filed and the applicant litigates listed patents or settles,
  • Or a patent expires and no injunction prevents launch.

How do settlements typically impact timing (180-day exclusivity, launch windows, and design-around)?

When a first filer obtains 180-day exclusivity, downstream generic launches usually accelerate once:

  • Court injunctions lapse,
  • Settlement carve-outs allow earlier supply for specific strengths,
  • FDA approves manufacturing changes that design around formulation claims.

What generic entry risks exist for Hysingla ER?

For branded opioids, entry risk is often strength-specific:

  • Some strengths may launch earlier based on patent landscape and facility readiness.
  • Payer formularies may switch quickly after generic availability due to rebate dynamics and contract renegotiations.

What formulations and dosage strengths matter most for financial exposure?

LA opioid product portfolios usually monetize the strengths with the greatest prescribing prevalence and easiest switching characteristics.

Which dosage strengths typically drive volume and margin?

Higher volume often clusters around mid-range ER strengths, where:

  • Patients can be stabilized without complex titration.
  • Prescribers follow common chronic pain dosing pathways.
  • Payer policies standardize coverage tiers.

Financial trajectory changes most when generics arrive in the most-prescribed strengths first.

How strong is the patent estate for Hysingla ER (claim categories and enforcement leverage)?

Patent strength affects:

  • Likelihood of successful injunctions against generic manufacture/marketing,
  • Size of settlement value,
  • Duration of brand protection on the most commercially important strengths.

What is the typical hierarchy of patent leverage for opioid ER products?

Commercially relevant enforcement usually follows:

  • Product-specific formulation and release-control claims (harder to design around),
  • Method-of-use claims (weaker if generic labels carve out),
  • Process claims (depends on manufacturing comparability).

How does Hysingla ER compare with other branded LA opioids in market economics?

Relative performance versus peers is driven by:

  • Total LAO market contraction or growth in the specific payer segments,
  • Brand-to-generic spread at the moment of generic entry,
  • Contracting behavior that can reduce net price independent of FDA competition.

What differs between hydrocodone ER and oxycodone ER market dynamics?

Hydrocodone ER can be sensitive to:

  • Shifts in opioid prescribing preferences and guideline emphasis,
  • Payer-driven restrictions that may target certain opioid classes,
  • State-level enforcement trends.

What does FDA regulatory status imply for ongoing commercialization risk?

Key commercialization risks include:

  • Safety labeling changes,
  • Risk management obligations that affect prescriber behavior,
  • Facility or manufacturing compliance issues that reduce supply reliability.

Even without generic entry, regulatory events can cause volume volatility.

What FDA milestones typically shift commercial outcomes?

  • Label changes that restrict use can depress sustained demand.
  • Manufacturing approval changes can affect supply continuity.
  • Controlled substance enforcement and audit outcomes can shift wholesalers and dispensing patterns.

What are the likely financial trajectory scenarios for Hysingla ER over the next exclusivity window?

Three scenarios dominate branded opioid economics:

  1. Continuation scenario (no meaningful launch disruption)

    • Brand maintains stable net sales due to formulary retention and slower switching.
  2. Gradual erosion scenario (select generic access or competitive substitution)

    • Net price declines as payers renegotiate and patients transition within LAO classes.
  3. Accelerated erosion scenario (broad generic availability)

    • Branded revenue compresses quickly as PBS and PBM contracts reprice to generic benchmarks.

The distinguishing factor is whether generic launch is broad across strengths and whether settlements delay rollout.

How much revenue exposure does Hysingla ER face from generic competition?

Revenue exposure depends on:

  • Remaining listed patent life for commercial strengths,
  • Presence of multiple challengers (often increases launch probability and accelerates switching),
  • Strength-specific generic approval timing and ability to supply.

Key Takeaways

  • Hysingla ER’s market dynamics are driven by chronic pain ER opioid demand, payer contracting controls, and substitution within the LAO class.
  • Its financial trajectory is primarily sensitive to Orange Book patent runoffs and the timing of Paragraph IV ANDA filings, litigation outcomes, and settlement terms.
  • Commercial risk is strength-specific: generic entry on the most prescribed ER hydrocodone strengths typically causes the largest net sales compression.
  • Ongoing FDA and controlled-substance risk management can create supply and utilization volatility even before direct generic competition.

FAQs

  1. What PBM formulary patterns usually determine Hysingla ER net sales durability?
  2. How do Paragraph IV ANDA filings typically shift the branded opioid contract negotiation cycle?
  3. Which Hysingla ER dosage strengths are most exposed to early generic launch risk?
  4. How does substitution between ER hydrocodone and ER oxycodone change market share during patent expiration?
  5. What regulatory label changes most often impact long-acting hydrocodone prescribing and revenue?

References (APA)

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drugs@FDA. Hysingla ER (hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release).
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. ANDA and patent certification guidance for Paragraph IV disputes (Hatch-Waxman framework materials).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.