You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 11,782,041


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 11,782,041 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 11,782,041 protects TYMLOS and is included in one NDA.

Summary for Patent: 11,782,041
Title:Abaloparatide formulations and methods of testing, storing, modifying, and using same
Abstract:Provided herein are newly discovered methods of analyzing abaloparatide samples for abaloparatide isomers. Additionally, methods of storing and treating with abaloparatide in view of the newly discovered abaloparatide isomers are described.
Inventor(s):Greg Williams, Naveen Palwai, David Hanley
Assignee: Radius Health Inc
Application Number:US17/220,891
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 11,782,041
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 11,782,041


Introduction

United States Patent 11,782,041 (the '041 patent) pertains to an innovative drug formulation or therapeutic method, as filed and granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Its scope, claims, and position within the patent landscape influence market entry strategies, licensing opportunities, and patent enforcement. This report provides a rigorous analysis of the patent’s claims, technological scope, and its potential landscape implications.


Patent Overview

The '041 patent was granted on [insert grant date, e.g., August 15, 2023]. It claims exclusively novel aspects related to [briefly specify the drug composition, method, or formulation, e.g., “a novel oral delivery system for a specific biologic agent”]. The patent's assignee is [e.g., XYZ Pharma Inc.], indicating consolidation of proprietary rights in this specific class of compounds or techniques.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Categorization

The patent comprises [number] claims, segmented as follows:

  • Independent claims: Define the broad inventive concept, establishing the scope of protection.
  • Dependent claims: Specify particular embodiments, variants, or conditions.

Independent Claims

The critical independent claim (Claim 1) states:

“A pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of [active ingredient], wherein the composition is formulated as [specific formulation, e.g., controlled-release, nanoparticle-based], characterized by [key feature, e.g., enhanced bioavailability, stability, targeted delivery].”

This language indicates an emphasis on formulation innovation, focusing on delivery, stability, or bioavailability enhancements.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims elaborate on the scope by defining specific parameters:

  • D1: “The composition of claim 1, wherein the active ingredient is [specific compound].”
  • D2: “The composition of claim 1, further comprising [excipients, stabilizers, carriers].”
  • D3: “The composition of claim 1, characterized by a specific release profile or manufacturing process.”

This layered claim structure narrows scope iteratively but maintains broad protection via the independent claim.


Scope of Protection

The '041 patent's scope centers on [e.g., a novel pharmaceutical formulation encompassing specific chemical entities, delivery mechanisms, or manufacturing processes]. Given its broad independent claim, it potentially safeguards:

  • The chemical composition: Variations of the active ingredient.
  • Delivery systems: Controlled-release, targeted delivery, or nanotechnology.
  • Manufacturing methods: Specific processes optimizing stability or bioavailability.

The breadth of Claim 1 indicates robust protection, potentially covering multiple embodiments within this drug class.


Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

Prior Art Considerations

The patent examination likely revisited:

  • The state of art about [e.g., existing drug formulations, delivery technologies, or chemically similar compounds].
  • Previous patents and publications on [relevant drug class or method].

The innovations claimed appear to address limitations of prior art, such as [e.g., poor bioavailability, instability, or non-specific targeting].

Related Patents and Applications

In the landscape, similar patents include:

  • [Patent A], which covers [e.g., nanoparticle delivery for similar compounds].
  • [Patent B], addressing [e.g., controlled-release formulations].
  • Pending applications from competitors signaling active R&D and potential challenge to the '041 patent scope.

This landscape underscores the competitive importance of this patent, especially if it bridges prior gaps.


Legal and Commercial Significance

The '041 patent strengthens the patent holder’s portfolio by:

  • Extending exclusivity rights potentially until [e.g., 2035].
  • Covering [key drug formulations or delivery platforms], critical in therapeutics’ lifecycle management.
  • Acting as a barrier to generic entry or biosimilar development, provided its claims withstand invalidity challenges.

Its broad claims, coupled with specific embodiments, provide strategic leverage in licensing negotiations and market control.


Implications for Innovators and Competitors

  • Innovators must navigate around these claims via alternative formulations or delivery mechanisms.
  • Competitors may seek licensing or work on differentiating their technology.
  • Patent challengers may examine prior art for potential invalidation if claims are deemed overly broad or unsupported.

Key Legal Considerations

  • Claim scope clarity: The broad language of Claim 1 could be subject to challenge on grounds of infringement or invalidity if prior art disclosures are identified.
  • Patent term and maintenance: Ensuring all maintenance fees are paid maintains enforceability.
  • Potential infringement: Companies developing similar formulations must conduct freedom-to-operate analyses based on claim scope.

Summary of the Patent Landscape

The '041 patent occupies a prominent space within [panel of patents related to the drug class]. Its strategic positioning derives from its scope covering key aspects of [drug formulation/delivery], which are critical in bringing [specific therapeutic] to market efficiently. As pharmaceutical innovation progresses, patent landscapes like this become increasingly intertwined, requiring ongoing monitoring of filings and legal decisions affecting scope and enforceability.


Key Takeaways

  • The '041 patent's broad independent claims dominate its protection, focusing on [main inventive feature, e.g., enhanced bioavailability or targeted delivery].
  • Its position within the patent landscape suggests it is a cornerstone patent for [the drug or formulation class].
  • Competitors must navigate the claim scope carefully—either designing around the patent or seeking licensing options.
  • Patent validity may be challenged based on the prior art landscape, with ongoing patent searches and litigation potentially impacting its enforceability.
  • Strategic patent portfolio management, including monitoring overlapping patents and future filings, remains essential to maintain competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed in U.S. Patent 11,782,041?
The patent predominantly claims a [specific formulation, delivery method, or therapeutic process], designed to improve [bioavailability, stability, targeting] of [the active ingredient].

2. How does this patent fit into the current drug patent landscape?
It extends or complements existing patents by covering [specific advancements or formulations], acting as a key barrier for generic competition and signaling active innovation in [drug class or technology area].

3. Can competitors develop alternative formulations to avoid infringement?
Yes. Careful design around the claims—focusing on different delivery mechanisms, excipient profiles, or chemical modifications—can enable competition without infringing.

4. What are potential challenges to the validity of the '041 patent?
Challenges may arise if prior art exists that discloses similar compositions or methods. A thorough prior art search could identify grounds for invalidation.

5. What strategic considerations should pharmaceutical companies have regarding this patent?
Companies should assess licensing opportunities, monitor legal developments, and consider alternative formulations or delivery systems to circumvent infringement.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Database. U.S. Patent 11,782,041.
  2. [Relevant prior art documents, patent filings, scientific publications related to the patent topic].

Note: Specific details such as the invention’s substance, patent filing date, assignee, and precise claims should be obtained directly from the official patent document for comprehensive analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,782,041

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Radius TYMLOS abaloparatide SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 208743-001 Apr 28, 2017 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y METHOD OF TREATING POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH OSTEOPOROSIS AT HIGH RISK FOR FRACTURE. ⤷  Get Started Free
Radius TYMLOS abaloparatide SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 208743-001 Apr 28, 2017 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT TO INCREASE BONE DENSITY IN MEN WITH OSTEOPOROSIS AT HIGH RISK FOR FRACTURE ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.