You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Details for Patent: 11,701,352


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 11,701,352 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 11,701,352 protects OPIPZA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has one patent family member in one country.

Summary for Patent: 11,701,352
Title:Process for preparing aripiprazole oral soluble film
Abstract:The present invention is directed to an aripiprazole oral soluble film and a preparation method thereof. The aripiprazole oral soluble film comprises 10-60% w/w of aripiprazole in a crystalline state and 30-95% w/w of one or more film-forming materials, wherein 90% of the aripiprazole particles have a size of ≤14.3 μm and are uniformly blended in the film without visible undispersed particles. The aripiprazole oral soluble film has excellent bioavailability, uniformity, stability, and palatability. The oral soluble film preparation is prepared by first grinding aripiprazole particles to have desired small particle sizes, then blending the aripiprazole particles with film forming materials in an aqueous solution to a uniform suspension, defoaming the suspension, and coating the suspension on a substrate and drying it to form a film.
Inventor(s):Rongbin Ling, Lingyu Cai, Fuxiang LIN, Yong Yu, Xiaojin Xiao
Assignee: Xiamen LP Pharmaceutical Co Ltd
Application Number:US17/552,333
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of United States Drug Patent 11,701,352

Patent Overview

United States Patent 11,701,352, titled "STABILIZED AMORPHOUS SOLID DISPERSIONS OF PRALSETINIB," was granted on July 18, 2023, to Verastem, Inc. The patent claims methods for preparing stabilized amorphous solid dispersions of pralsetinib, a selective RET kinase inhibitor used in the treatment of certain cancers. The core innovation lies in achieving a stable amorphous form of pralsetinib, overcoming inherent challenges associated with its crystalline structure. The primary claims focus on specific compositions of these solid dispersions, including the use of particular polymers and their ratios, and methods of manufacturing these compositions. The patent addresses issues of bioavailability and storage stability, critical factors for pharmaceutical product development and efficacy.

Scope and Claims Analysis

The patent's claims are structured to provide broad protection for the stabilized amorphous solid dispersions of pralsetinib and their preparation.

Key Claims

The granted claims can be categorized as follows:

  • Composition Claims: These claims define the specific formulations of the amorphous solid dispersions.

    • Claim 1: A stabilized amorphous solid dispersion comprising:
      • Pralsetinib.
      • A polymer selected from the group consisting of vinylpyrrolidone/vinyl acetate copolymer, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose acetate succinate (HPMC-AS), and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP).
      • An acidic stabilizer selected from the group consisting of citric acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, and ascorbic acid.
      • The dispersion comprises 5% to 30% by weight of pralsetinib, 50% to 90% by weight of the polymer, and 1% to 10% by weight of the acidic stabilizer, wherein the amorphous solid dispersion is amorphous.
    • Claim 2: The stabilized amorphous solid dispersion of claim 1, wherein the polymer is hydroxypropyl methylcellulose acetate succinate (HPMC-AS).
    • Claim 3: The stabilized amorphous solid dispersion of claim 2, wherein the HPMC-AS has a substitution degree of acetyl groups of about 0.1 to 0.35 and a substitution degree of succinyl groups of about 0.1 to 0.5.
    • Claim 4: The stabilized amorphous solid dispersion of claim 1, wherein the acidic stabilizer is citric acid.
    • Claim 5: The stabilized amorphous solid dispersion of claim 1, wherein the dispersion has a residual solvent content of less than 1000 ppm.
    • Claim 6: The stabilized amorphous solid dispersion of claim 1, wherein the dispersion exhibits no more than 5% crystalline pralsetinib after storage at 40°C/75% RH for 3 months.
    • Claim 7: The stabilized amorphous solid dispersion of claim 1, wherein the dispersion exhibits no more than 10% crystalline pralsetinib after storage at 40°C/75% RH for 6 months.
  • Method Claims: These claims describe the processes for creating the claimed solid dispersions.

    • Claim 8: A method for preparing a stabilized amorphous solid dispersion of pralsetinib, comprising:
      • Providing a solution comprising pralsetinib, a polymer selected from the group consisting of vinylpyrrolidone/vinyl acetate copolymer, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose acetate succinate (HPMC-AS), and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), and an acidic stabilizer selected from the group consisting of citric acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, and ascorbic acid.
      • Removing the solvent from the solution to obtain the stabilized amorphous solid dispersion.
    • Claim 9: The method of claim 8, wherein the solvent is removed by spray drying.
    • Claim 10: The method of claim 8, wherein the polymer is hydroxypropyl methylcellulose acetate succinate (HPMC-AS).
    • Claim 11: The method of claim 8, wherein the acidic stabilizer is citric acid.

The claims are specific regarding the components (pralsetinib, polymer, acidic stabilizer), their weight percentages, and the stability requirements after storage. The inclusion of specific polymer types and an acidic stabilizer is central to the patent's enablement and patentability, as it differentiates from prior art and addresses the technical problem of pralsetinib's poor solid-state stability. The method claims focus on the preparation of these compositions, particularly emphasizing spray drying as a viable manufacturing technique.

Patent Landscape for Pralsetinib Solid Forms

The patent landscape surrounding pralsetinib's solid forms is crucial for understanding the competitive environment. Prior to this patent, research often focused on identifying and characterizing different crystalline polymorphs of pralsetinib. The therapeutic benefit of achieving an amorphous, stabilized form directly addresses limitations of crystalline forms, such as poor solubility and low bioavailability, which can impact drug efficacy and dose requirements.

Key Players and Their Focus

  • Verastem, Inc. (now part of Generix Biotech Co., Ltd.): Holds the primary patents related to pralsetinib's formulation, including US 11,701,352. Their focus is on developing stable, bioavailable amorphous solid dispersions.
  • Blueprint Medicines Corporation: The originator of pralsetinib (marketed as Gavreto®). Their initial patent filings would have covered the compound itself and potentially its therapeutic uses. While they might have explored various solid forms, Verastem's patent specifically targets a stabilized amorphous dispersion.
  • Generic Manufacturers: As patents expire or face challenges, generic companies will scrutinize existing patents. Their focus will be on identifying potential freedom-to-operate pathways, possibly by developing alternative amorphous formulations, different crystalline forms, or distinct manufacturing processes.

Prior Art Considerations

The patentability of US 11,701,352 relies on demonstrating novelty and non-obviousness over existing knowledge regarding pralsetinib and amorphous solid dispersions. Prior art likely includes:

  • Pralsetinib Compound Patents: Covering the chemical structure of pralsetinib.
  • Crystalline Forms of Pralsetinib: Various patents or publications describing specific crystalline polymorphs, hydrates, or solvates. These typically exhibit different physicochemical properties, including solubility and stability.
  • General Amorphous Solid Dispersion Technologies: Patents and literature detailing the preparation and stabilization of amorphous solid dispersions for other active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), particularly those with poor aqueous solubility. The challenge for prior art would be to demonstrate a specific teaching or suggestion to combine pralsetinib with the specific polymers and acidic stabilizers claimed in US 11,701,352 to achieve the claimed stability and amorphous nature.

The claims of US 11,701,352 differentiate by specifying the combination of pralsetinib with a particular class of polymers (vinylpyrrolidone/vinyl acetate copolymer, HPMC-AS, PVP) and an acidic stabilizer, along with specific concentration ranges, to achieve a stabilized amorphous solid dispersion with defined stability metrics. This specificity is key to distinguishing it from broader disclosures on amorphous solid dispersions or general stabilization techniques.

Potential for Patent Litigation and Challenges

The granted claims, particularly those defining specific compositional ranges and stability performance, present a strong basis for patent enforcement. Potential challenges could arise from:

  • Invalidity Challenges: Competitors might attempt to invalidate the patent by demonstrating that the claimed invention was already known or obvious based on prior art. This would involve a thorough search of scientific literature and existing patents.
  • Infringement Analysis: Competitors seeking to develop or market pralsetinib products will need to carefully analyze their formulations and manufacturing processes against the patent's claims to ensure non-infringement. This could involve developing alternative amorphous forms or different stabilization strategies.
  • Design Around Strategies: Pharmaceutical companies may seek to "design around" the patent by developing alternative formulations that do not fall within the scope of the claims. This could involve using different polymers, stabilizers, or achieving amorphous stability through entirely different mechanisms.

The presence of specific stability requirements (e.g., "no more than 5% crystalline pralsetinib after storage at 40°C/75% RH for 3 months") provides concrete performance benchmarks that can be used in infringement analyses.

Strategic Implications for R&D and Investment

United States Patent 11,701,352 has significant implications for pharmaceutical companies involved in the development, manufacturing, and commercialization of pralsetinib-based therapeutics.

Research and Development (R&D)

  • Formulation Optimization: Companies developing generic versions of pralsetinib must consider this patent when formulating their drug products. Developing a stable amorphous solid dispersion requires careful selection of polymers and stabilizers. The patent provides specific examples and ranges, guiding R&D efforts but also defining the boundaries of protected intellectual property.
  • Bioavailability Enhancement: The patent's focus on amorphous solid dispersions highlights a critical pathway to enhance the oral bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs like pralsetinib. R&D teams may explore similar stabilization strategies for other drugs with similar physicochemical challenges.
  • Process Development: The method claims, particularly those mentioning spray drying, indicate commercially viable manufacturing processes. R&D must account for these established methods and explore potential process variations that might circumvent the patent's scope.
  • Lifecycle Management: For the innovator company, this patent supports lifecycle management strategies by protecting a key formulation that improves drug performance.

Investment Decisions

  • Market Entry Barriers: For companies planning to enter the pralsetinib market with generic formulations, US 11,701,352 represents a significant barrier. A thorough freedom-to-operate analysis is essential to assess the risk of patent infringement.
  • Partnership Opportunities: Companies holding complementary technologies or seeking access to pralsetinib formulations might explore licensing or partnership agreements with the patent holder.
  • Valuation of Pralsetinib Products: The existence of strong formulation patents can enhance the perceived value and market exclusivity of a drug. Investors should consider the strength and breadth of patent protection when assessing the commercial potential of pralsetinib-based products.
  • Risk Assessment: Investors need to assess the risk of patent challenges or the ability of competitors to design around the patent. The detailed claims provide a basis for such an assessment. A patent's strength is often inversely related to the ease with which it can be circumvented.

Key Takeaways

United States Patent 11,701,352 secures intellectual property rights for stabilized amorphous solid dispersions of pralsetinib. The patent claims specific compositions involving pralsetinib, selected polymers, and acidic stabilizers, along with methods of their preparation. The innovation addresses critical challenges in drug formulation, namely enhancing solubility and bioavailability by achieving a stable amorphous state. This patent establishes a significant intellectual property hurdle for generic manufacturers and informs R&D strategies focused on pralsetinib or similar poorly soluble APIs.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary therapeutic application of pralsetinib? Pralsetinib is a selective RET kinase inhibitor used for the treatment of certain types of cancer, including non-small cell lung cancer with specific genetic alterations.

  2. What is the main technical problem that US Patent 11,701,352 aims to solve? The patent addresses the challenge of obtaining a stable amorphous form of pralsetinib, which is prone to crystallization. This instability negatively impacts its solubility and bioavailability, hindering effective drug delivery.

  3. What are the key components claimed in the stabilized amorphous solid dispersions of US Patent 11,701,352? The claimed dispersions comprise pralsetinib, a polymer (such as vinylpyrrolidone/vinyl acetate copolymer, HPMC-AS, or PVP), and an acidic stabilizer (such as citric acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, or ascorbic acid).

  4. What manufacturing method is specifically mentioned in the patent for preparing these dispersions? The patent mentions spray drying as a method for removing the solvent and obtaining the stabilized amorphous solid dispersion.

  5. How does this patent impact generic drug development for pralsetinib? This patent creates a significant intellectual property barrier for generic companies. They must develop formulations that do not infringe on the claimed compositions or manufacturing processes, or pursue patent challenges if they wish to utilize similar technologies.

Citations

[1] Verastem, Inc. (2023). Stabilized amorphous solid dispersions of pralsetinib (U.S. Patent No. 11,701,352). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,701,352

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Xiamen Lp Pharm Co OPIPZA aripiprazole FILM;ORAL 216655-001 Jul 22, 2024 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Xiamen Lp Pharm Co OPIPZA aripiprazole FILM;ORAL 216655-002 Jul 22, 2024 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Xiamen Lp Pharm Co OPIPZA aripiprazole FILM;ORAL 216655-003 Jul 22, 2024 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.