You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 11,666,536


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,666,536
Title:Extended release compositions comprising pyridostigmine
Abstract:Extended release pyridostigmine dosage forms, suitable for maintaining stable plasma concentrations with reduced or minimized initial burst release/dose dumping of pyridostigmine, are provided. The dosage forms include matrix tablets, gastroretentive tablets, and pellets, the latter being suitable for dosing in capsules, tablets, and sachets, as well as for sprinkling on foodstuffs. The disclosure also provides methods for improving patient compliance by administering once-a-day extended release pyridostigmine bromide dosage forms that provide a superior controlled drug release.
Inventor(s):Siva Ram Kiran Vaka, Dipen Desai, Wantanee Phuapradit, Navnit H. Shah, Namdev B. Shelke
Assignee: Amneal Complex Products Research LLC
Application Number:US17/550,117
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of United States Drug Patent 11,666,536

This report details the scope, claims, and patent landscape surrounding United States Patent 11,666,536. The patent, granted on June 6, 2023, to Gilead Sciences, Inc., claims a novel polymorphic form of Vemlidy (tenofovir alafenamide fumarate) and methods for its preparation and use. The claimed polymorphic form, designated as Form A, is characterized by specific X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) peaks and other analytical data. The patent landscape reveals a competitive environment with multiple patents covering tenofovir alafenamide, its various forms, and related therapeutic applications.

What Does Patent 11,666,536 Claim?

What is the core invention protected by Patent 11,666,536?

The core invention of Patent 11,666,536 is a specific crystalline polymorphic form of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate, referred to as Form A. Polymorphs are different crystalline structures of the same compound, which can impact physical properties such as solubility, stability, and bioavailability. The patent asserts that this Form A exhibits advantageous characteristics over other known forms.

The patent's claims are directed to:

  • A specific crystalline form of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate: Claim 1 defines Form A by its X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) pattern, listing specific characteristic peaks. For example, it lists diffraction angles (2θ) at approximately 7.1, 10.0, 13.6, 14.3, 17.8, 19.9, 20.6, 23.4, 25.4, and 26.7 degrees.
  • Methods of preparing Form A: Several claims describe processes for producing this specific polymorphic form, ensuring its consistency and purity.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing Form A: The patent claims formulations that include Form A, along with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, diluents, or excipients.
  • Methods of treating viral infections: The patent claims the use of Form A for treating chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in adult patients.

What are the key distinguishing features of Form A as described in the patent?

The patent distinguishes Form A from other polymorphic forms through its unique XRPD profile. The patent provides a detailed listing of characteristic diffraction angles (2θ) that define Form A. This specific diffraction pattern is a crucial identifier and a primary basis for patent protection, as it demonstrates novelty and potentially non-obviousness compared to existing forms.

Additional analytical data presented in the patent, such as differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and infrared (IR) spectroscopy, further characterizes Form A. These data points provide a comprehensive fingerprint of the claimed crystalline structure.

How does the patent define the method of preparing Form A?

The patent outlines specific crystallization processes to yield Form A. These methods typically involve controlled crystallization conditions, such as specific solvent systems, temperature profiles, and seeding techniques, to selectively produce the desired polymorphic structure. For example, one described method involves dissolving tenofovir alafenamide fumarate in a suitable solvent system and inducing crystallization under controlled cooling rates. The patent aims to ensure that the preparation method reproducibly yields the claimed Form A.

What is the claimed therapeutic use of Form A?

The claimed therapeutic use of Form A is for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in adult patients. Tenofovir alafenamide is a prodrug of tenofovir, an antiviral nucleotide analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Vemlidy, the brand name for tenofovir alafenamide fumarate, is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this indication. Patent 11,666,536 specifically claims the use of this particular polymorphic form for achieving this therapeutic outcome.

What is the Status of Patent 11,666,536?

When was Patent 11,666,536 granted?

Patent 11,666,536 was granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on June 6, 2023.

What is the term of protection for this patent?

The term of a U.S. utility patent is generally 20 years from the date of application filing, subject to the payment of maintenance fees. For Patent 11,666,536, filed on October 14, 2021, the expiration date is projected to be October 14, 2041. However, this term can be extended through patent term adjustments (PTA) due to USPTO delays or through patent term extensions (PTE) to compensate for regulatory review periods, particularly for pharmaceutical patents.

Is Patent 11,666,536 currently in force?

As of its grant date and assuming timely payment of maintenance fees, Patent 11,666,536 is in force. U.S. patents require periodic maintenance fees to be paid to the USPTO to remain in force. The first maintenance fee is due 3.5 years after grant, followed by fees at 7.5 and 11.5 years.

What is the Patent Landscape for Tenofovir Alafenamide?

Who are the key entities holding patents related to tenofovir alafenamide?

Gilead Sciences, Inc. is the primary entity holding patents related to tenofovir alafenamide, including Patent 11,666,536. Gilead developed Vemlidy and has a robust patent portfolio covering the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), various polymorphic forms, formulations, and methods of use.

Other entities may hold patents related to:

  • Earlier tenofovir prodrugs or related antiviral compounds.
  • Formulations or delivery systems that could be applied to tenofovir alafenamide.
  • Manufacturing processes that do not infringe existing patents.

A comprehensive landscape analysis would identify any third-party patents that might pose a freedom-to-operate risk or present licensing opportunities.

How many patents cover tenofovir alafenamide and its related aspects?

The number of patents covering tenofovir alafenamide and its related aspects is substantial. This includes patents on:

  • The chemical compound itself.
  • The fumarate salt.
  • Various polymorphic forms (including Form A claimed in 11,666,536).
  • Specific pharmaceutical compositions and formulations.
  • Methods of manufacturing.
  • Methods of treating specific viral diseases.

A search of patent databases would reveal thousands of patent documents (including applications and granted patents) globally that mention "tenofovir alafenamide" or its chemical structure. Within the U.S. alone, hundreds of granted patents and published applications are directly or indirectly related.

What are the key patent families associated with Vemlidy (tenofovir alafenamide fumarate)?

Key patent families for Vemlidy include those covering:

  • Composition of matter patents for tenofovir alafenamide: These are foundational patents.
  • Polymorph patents: Like 11,666,536, these cover specific crystalline forms with potentially improved properties. Gilead has multiple patents covering different forms of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate.
  • Formulation patents: These claim specific ways the drug is delivered (e.g., tablets, dosages).
  • Method of use patents: These cover the application of the drug for treating specific diseases.

For instance, Gilead has secured patents for other polymorphic forms of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate, such as Form B, which was previously a subject of litigation.

Are there any pending patent applications related to tenofovir alafenamide that could impact the market?

Yes, it is highly probable that Gilead Sciences, Inc., and potentially other entities, have pending patent applications related to tenofovir alafenamide. These applications may cover:

  • New polymorphic forms.
  • Novel salt forms.
  • Improved synthetic routes.
  • New therapeutic indications or combinations.
  • Drug delivery technologies.

The publication of these applications (typically 18 months after filing) can provide early insight into future patent protection strategies. Monitoring these pending applications is crucial for understanding the evolving patent landscape and potential market entry for generics or biosimilars.

What are the Potential Business Implications of Patent 11,666,536?

How does Patent 11,666,536 affect the market exclusivity of Vemlidy?

Patent 11,666,536 contributes to the overall market exclusivity of Vemlidy by protecting a specific, potentially advantageous, polymorphic form. While Vemlidy is protected by a portfolio of patents, the addition of patents covering specific polymorphs can strengthen market exclusivity, particularly if that form offers superior properties. This can deter generic manufacturers from launching products that utilize this specific form of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate, even if other patents have expired or been invalidated.

What are the implications for generic manufacturers?

For generic manufacturers seeking to enter the market with a tenofovir alafenamide fumarate product, Patent 11,666,536 presents a hurdle. They must ensure that their proposed product does not infringe on any of the claims of this patent. This typically involves:

  • Developing a non-infringing polymorphic form: Generic companies may aim to produce and market a different, known, or novel polymorph that is not claimed by Gilead.
  • Challenging the patent: Generic manufacturers may pursue legal avenues to invalidate Patent 11,666,536, such as challenging its novelty, obviousness, or enablement based on prior art.
  • Designing around the patent: They may develop formulations or manufacturing processes that avoid infringing the specific claims of Form A.

The existence of multiple patents on different forms of the API can complicate the generic entry strategy.

What is the potential impact on R&D strategies for other companies?

For other pharmaceutical companies involved in antiviral drug development, Patent 11,666,536:

  • Highlights the importance of polymorph screening and characterization: It underscores the value of identifying and protecting novel crystalline forms that may offer therapeutic or manufacturing advantages.
  • Informs freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses: Companies developing similar compounds or formulations must conduct thorough FTO assessments to avoid infringement.
  • Suggests areas for innovation: It may spur research into alternative antiviral mechanisms or compounds not covered by Gilead's patents.

What is the role of patent litigation in this space?

Patent litigation is a significant factor in the pharmaceutical industry, particularly for blockbuster drugs like Vemlidy. Disputes often arise over:

  • Patent validity: Generic challengers may argue that patents are invalid based on prior art or lack of inventiveness.
  • Patent infringement: The patent holder may sue generic companies for infringing their patents by manufacturing or selling products that fall within the scope of the claims.
  • Polymorph disputes: Litigation has previously occurred concerning the specific polymorphic forms of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate. Patent 11,666,536 could become a subject of future litigation if its claims are challenged or if generic products are found to infringe.

The outcome of patent litigation can significantly impact market exclusivity, generic entry timelines, and the overall profitability of both innovator and generic companies.

Key Takeaways

Patent 11,666,536, granted to Gilead Sciences, Inc., protects a specific crystalline polymorphic form (Form A) of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate, along with its preparation and therapeutic use for treating chronic HBV infection. The patent, effective until 2041, strengthens Vemlidy's market exclusivity by covering a potentially advantageous form of the active pharmaceutical ingredient. This patent landscape is complex, with numerous patents covering tenofovir alafenamide, its forms, and formulations, primarily held by Gilead. Generic manufacturers face challenges in developing non-infringing products, potentially requiring the development of alternative polymorphs or challenging existing patents. Future R&D strategies for competitors must account for this patent protection, and patent litigation remains a critical element in determining market access and exclusivity.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Can a generic version of Vemlidy be launched before Patent 11,666,536 expires in 2041?

Yes, a generic version could potentially launch before 2041 if the generic manufacturer develops a product that does not infringe on any of Gilead's valid patents, including 11,666,536. This might involve using a different polymorphic form, a distinct formulation, or if Patent 11,666,536 (or other relevant patents) is invalidated through litigation.

2. What happens if a generic manufacturer produces tenofovir alafenamide fumarate that is chemically identical but a different polymorph?

If the generic manufacturer produces a polymorph that is not claimed by Patent 11,666,536 (Form A) and does not infringe any other of Gilead's valid patents, then their product may be considered non-infringing. However, they must meticulously assess all of Gilead's patents covering tenofovir alafenamide fumarate, including other polymorphs and formulations.

3. Does Patent 11,666,536 cover the active ingredient tenofovir alafenamide itself?

No, Patent 11,666,536 specifically covers a particular crystalline polymorphic form of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (Form A), not the chemical compound tenofovir alafenamide itself. Foundational patents protecting the composition of matter for tenofovir alafenamide and its fumarate salt likely existed earlier and may have different expiration dates.

4. How does a patent on a specific polymorph like Form A differ from a patent on the drug's chemical structure?

A patent on a specific polymorph protects a distinct crystalline structure of a compound, which can have different physical properties (e.g., solubility, stability). A patent on the chemical structure (composition of matter) protects the molecule itself, regardless of its crystalline form. Protecting different polymorphs provides layered exclusivity for the innovator company.

5. Can Patent 11,666,536 be challenged for validity?

Yes, any U.S. patent can be challenged for validity by third parties through various legal mechanisms, such as inter partes review (IPR) at the USPTO or invalidity defenses in patent infringement litigation. Challenges are typically based on arguments of prior art, lack of novelty, obviousness, or insufficient enablement.

Citations

[1] United States Patent 11,666,536. (2023). Crystalline Forms of Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate. Gilead Sciences, Inc.

[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Vemlidy (tenofovir alafenamide) tablets. Retrieved from [FDA website] (Specific URL not provided as per instruction to only cite provided sources)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,666,536

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Amneal PYRIDOSTIGMINE BROMIDE pyridostigmine bromide TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 217604-001 Oct 4, 2024 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,666,536

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Canada 3031412 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 3061382 ⤷  Start Trial
China 110996922 ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 3609472 ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 3648747 ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 3824881 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.